Cargando…

A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes

Among the various parameters obtainable through the analysis of the human gut microbiota, the enterotype is one of the first classifications of the bacterial consortia, which tried to obtain, at the same time, as much information as possible to be applied in clinical medicine. Although some authors...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Di Pierro, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112341
_version_ 1784604671715835904
author Di Pierro, Francesco
author_facet Di Pierro, Francesco
author_sort Di Pierro, Francesco
collection PubMed
description Among the various parameters obtainable through the analysis of the human gut microbiota, the enterotype is one of the first classifications of the bacterial consortia, which tried to obtain, at the same time, as much information as possible to be applied in clinical medicine. Although some authors observed the existence not of clusters, but only of a real continuous gradient, enterotypes are commonly described according to various models. The first model predicted either clustering into enterotypes 1 and 2 based on two specific dominances, Bacteroides and Prevotella, respectively, with the Ruminococcus dominance blurred within the Bacteroides dominance, or it predicted a threedominant condition, in which the Ruminococcus driver constituted enterotype 3, separated from enterotype 1. A second model envisaged three possible ways to cluster gut microbiota, respectively centred on two, three, and four dominances. In the first case, enterotypes 1 and 2 coincided with the two original enterotypes, with the dominance of Bacteroides and Prevotella, respectively. In the second case, the existence of enterotype 3 was evident and whose dominance was not centred on Ruminococcus but extended more towards the entire Firmicutes phylum. In the third case, the presence of the phylum Firmicutes was split into two different enterotypes generating the clusters defined and named as Mixtures 1 and 2. Subsequently, the analysis of the water content (hydration) in the stool allowed the splitting of the Bacteroides enterotype into two sub-enterotype, respectively known as B1 and B2. All these models have allowed us to highlight some correlations between a specific enterotype, or cluster, and some characteristics, such as the greater predisposition of the respective hosts towards certain pathologies. These observations, coupled with the attempt to derive the different microbiota on an evolutionary basis, can help to shed new light on this topic and demonstrate the possible utility that the different ways of clustering the gut microbiota can have in a clinical application perspective and in preventive medicine.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8618122
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86181222021-11-27 A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes Di Pierro, Francesco Microorganisms Review Among the various parameters obtainable through the analysis of the human gut microbiota, the enterotype is one of the first classifications of the bacterial consortia, which tried to obtain, at the same time, as much information as possible to be applied in clinical medicine. Although some authors observed the existence not of clusters, but only of a real continuous gradient, enterotypes are commonly described according to various models. The first model predicted either clustering into enterotypes 1 and 2 based on two specific dominances, Bacteroides and Prevotella, respectively, with the Ruminococcus dominance blurred within the Bacteroides dominance, or it predicted a threedominant condition, in which the Ruminococcus driver constituted enterotype 3, separated from enterotype 1. A second model envisaged three possible ways to cluster gut microbiota, respectively centred on two, three, and four dominances. In the first case, enterotypes 1 and 2 coincided with the two original enterotypes, with the dominance of Bacteroides and Prevotella, respectively. In the second case, the existence of enterotype 3 was evident and whose dominance was not centred on Ruminococcus but extended more towards the entire Firmicutes phylum. In the third case, the presence of the phylum Firmicutes was split into two different enterotypes generating the clusters defined and named as Mixtures 1 and 2. Subsequently, the analysis of the water content (hydration) in the stool allowed the splitting of the Bacteroides enterotype into two sub-enterotype, respectively known as B1 and B2. All these models have allowed us to highlight some correlations between a specific enterotype, or cluster, and some characteristics, such as the greater predisposition of the respective hosts towards certain pathologies. These observations, coupled with the attempt to derive the different microbiota on an evolutionary basis, can help to shed new light on this topic and demonstrate the possible utility that the different ways of clustering the gut microbiota can have in a clinical application perspective and in preventive medicine. MDPI 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8618122/ /pubmed/34835466 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112341 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Di Pierro, Francesco
A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes
title A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes
title_full A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes
title_fullStr A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes
title_full_unstemmed A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes
title_short A Possible Perspective about the Compositional Models, Evolution, and Clinical Meaning of Human Enterotypes
title_sort possible perspective about the compositional models, evolution, and clinical meaning of human enterotypes
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618122/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835466
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112341
work_keys_str_mv AT dipierrofrancesco apossibleperspectiveaboutthecompositionalmodelsevolutionandclinicalmeaningofhumanenterotypes
AT dipierrofrancesco possibleperspectiveaboutthecompositionalmodelsevolutionandclinicalmeaningofhumanenterotypes