Cargando…

Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors

Although the recent development and widespread use of image-enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy have improved endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer, it is somewhat complicated, requires a higher level of expertise, and is still subjective. Photodynamic endoscopic diagnosis (PDED) is based o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kurumi, Hiroki, Kanda, Tsutomu, Ikebuchi, Yuichiro, Yoshida, Akira, Kawaguchi, Koichiro, Yashima, Kazuo, Isomoto, Hajime
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829314
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111967
_version_ 1784604713881174016
author Kurumi, Hiroki
Kanda, Tsutomu
Ikebuchi, Yuichiro
Yoshida, Akira
Kawaguchi, Koichiro
Yashima, Kazuo
Isomoto, Hajime
author_facet Kurumi, Hiroki
Kanda, Tsutomu
Ikebuchi, Yuichiro
Yoshida, Akira
Kawaguchi, Koichiro
Yashima, Kazuo
Isomoto, Hajime
author_sort Kurumi, Hiroki
collection PubMed
description Although the recent development and widespread use of image-enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy have improved endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer, it is somewhat complicated, requires a higher level of expertise, and is still subjective. Photodynamic endoscopic diagnosis (PDED) is based on the fluorescence of photosensitizers that accumulate in tumors, which enables objective evaluation independent of the endoscopist’s experience, and is useful for tumor detection. The objective of this work was to perform a narrative review of PDED for gastric tumors and to introduce our approach to PDED in gastric tumors in our hospital. In our review there have been case reports of PDED for gastric cancer, but its usefulness has not been established because no prospective studies evaluating its usefulness have been performed. In our previous study, 85.7% (42/49) of gastric tumors exhibited fluorescence in PDED. PDED may be useful in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Our previous studies were pilot studies in cancer patients; therefore, future prospective studies are required to verify the usefulness of PDED.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8618298
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86182982021-11-27 Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors Kurumi, Hiroki Kanda, Tsutomu Ikebuchi, Yuichiro Yoshida, Akira Kawaguchi, Koichiro Yashima, Kazuo Isomoto, Hajime Diagnostics (Basel) Review Although the recent development and widespread use of image-enhanced endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy have improved endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer, it is somewhat complicated, requires a higher level of expertise, and is still subjective. Photodynamic endoscopic diagnosis (PDED) is based on the fluorescence of photosensitizers that accumulate in tumors, which enables objective evaluation independent of the endoscopist’s experience, and is useful for tumor detection. The objective of this work was to perform a narrative review of PDED for gastric tumors and to introduce our approach to PDED in gastric tumors in our hospital. In our review there have been case reports of PDED for gastric cancer, but its usefulness has not been established because no prospective studies evaluating its usefulness have been performed. In our previous study, 85.7% (42/49) of gastric tumors exhibited fluorescence in PDED. PDED may be useful in the diagnosis of early gastric cancer. Our previous studies were pilot studies in cancer patients; therefore, future prospective studies are required to verify the usefulness of PDED. MDPI 2021-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8618298/ /pubmed/34829314 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111967 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Kurumi, Hiroki
Kanda, Tsutomu
Ikebuchi, Yuichiro
Yoshida, Akira
Kawaguchi, Koichiro
Yashima, Kazuo
Isomoto, Hajime
Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_full Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_fullStr Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_full_unstemmed Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_short Current Status of Photodynamic Diagnosis for Gastric Tumors
title_sort current status of photodynamic diagnosis for gastric tumors
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829314
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111967
work_keys_str_mv AT kurumihiroki currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors
AT kandatsutomu currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors
AT ikebuchiyuichiro currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors
AT yoshidaakira currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors
AT kawaguchikoichiro currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors
AT yashimakazuo currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors
AT isomotohajime currentstatusofphotodynamicdiagnosisforgastrictumors