Cargando…
Effect of COVID-19 on Anti-S Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers Six Months Post-Vaccination
The current study aimed to determine to what extent prior COVID-19 infection affects the response of specific antibodies following vaccination. The study involved 173 healthcare professionals who completed the two-dose vaccination course with BNT162b2, including 40 who previously experienced clinica...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111325 |
_version_ | 1784604734275977216 |
---|---|
author | Flisiak, Robert Pawłowska, Małgorzata Rogalska-Płońska, Magdalena Bociąga-Jasik, Monika Kłos, Krzysztof Piekarska, Anna Zarębska-Michaluk, Dorota |
author_facet | Flisiak, Robert Pawłowska, Małgorzata Rogalska-Płońska, Magdalena Bociąga-Jasik, Monika Kłos, Krzysztof Piekarska, Anna Zarębska-Michaluk, Dorota |
author_sort | Flisiak, Robert |
collection | PubMed |
description | The current study aimed to determine to what extent prior COVID-19 infection affects the response of specific antibodies following vaccination. The study involved 173 healthcare professionals who completed the two-dose vaccination course with BNT162b2, including 40 who previously experienced clinical COVID-19. The levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1S2 IgG (anti-S) and, in some cases, anti-SARS-CoV-S-RBD IgG (anti-S-RBD) were determined six months after complete vaccination. A level exceeding the cut-off values for both anti-S and anti-S-RBD was observed in 100% of subjects, but after setting the analysis to 5- and 10-fold cut-off levels, the percentage of subjects meeting this criterion was significantly higher for anti-S-RBD. The 100-fold cut-off level was achieved by only 21% and 16% for anti-S and anti-S-RBD, respectively. Anti-S and anti-S-RBD levels above ten times the positive cut-off were respectively observed in 91% and 100% individuals with a history of COVID-19, while among those without COVID-19, these values were 64% and 90%, respectively. Significantly higher incidence of values above 10 and 100 times the cut-off became apparent among people with a history of COVID-19. In conclusion, vaccination against COVID-19 following infection with the disease provides higher levels of specific antibodies 6 months after vaccination than those of individuals without a history of the disease, which supports the use of a booster dose, particularly for those who have not experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8618383 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86183832021-11-27 Effect of COVID-19 on Anti-S Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers Six Months Post-Vaccination Flisiak, Robert Pawłowska, Małgorzata Rogalska-Płońska, Magdalena Bociąga-Jasik, Monika Kłos, Krzysztof Piekarska, Anna Zarębska-Michaluk, Dorota Vaccines (Basel) Article The current study aimed to determine to what extent prior COVID-19 infection affects the response of specific antibodies following vaccination. The study involved 173 healthcare professionals who completed the two-dose vaccination course with BNT162b2, including 40 who previously experienced clinical COVID-19. The levels of anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1S2 IgG (anti-S) and, in some cases, anti-SARS-CoV-S-RBD IgG (anti-S-RBD) were determined six months after complete vaccination. A level exceeding the cut-off values for both anti-S and anti-S-RBD was observed in 100% of subjects, but after setting the analysis to 5- and 10-fold cut-off levels, the percentage of subjects meeting this criterion was significantly higher for anti-S-RBD. The 100-fold cut-off level was achieved by only 21% and 16% for anti-S and anti-S-RBD, respectively. Anti-S and anti-S-RBD levels above ten times the positive cut-off were respectively observed in 91% and 100% individuals with a history of COVID-19, while among those without COVID-19, these values were 64% and 90%, respectively. Significantly higher incidence of values above 10 and 100 times the cut-off became apparent among people with a history of COVID-19. In conclusion, vaccination against COVID-19 following infection with the disease provides higher levels of specific antibodies 6 months after vaccination than those of individuals without a history of the disease, which supports the use of a booster dose, particularly for those who have not experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection. MDPI 2021-11-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8618383/ /pubmed/34835257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111325 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Flisiak, Robert Pawłowska, Małgorzata Rogalska-Płońska, Magdalena Bociąga-Jasik, Monika Kłos, Krzysztof Piekarska, Anna Zarębska-Michaluk, Dorota Effect of COVID-19 on Anti-S Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers Six Months Post-Vaccination |
title | Effect of COVID-19 on Anti-S Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers Six Months Post-Vaccination |
title_full | Effect of COVID-19 on Anti-S Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers Six Months Post-Vaccination |
title_fullStr | Effect of COVID-19 on Anti-S Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers Six Months Post-Vaccination |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of COVID-19 on Anti-S Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers Six Months Post-Vaccination |
title_short | Effect of COVID-19 on Anti-S Antibody Response in Healthcare Workers Six Months Post-Vaccination |
title_sort | effect of covid-19 on anti-s antibody response in healthcare workers six months post-vaccination |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618383/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111325 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT flisiakrobert effectofcovid19onantisantibodyresponseinhealthcareworkerssixmonthspostvaccination AT pawłowskamałgorzata effectofcovid19onantisantibodyresponseinhealthcareworkerssixmonthspostvaccination AT rogalskapłonskamagdalena effectofcovid19onantisantibodyresponseinhealthcareworkerssixmonthspostvaccination AT bociagajasikmonika effectofcovid19onantisantibodyresponseinhealthcareworkerssixmonthspostvaccination AT kłoskrzysztof effectofcovid19onantisantibodyresponseinhealthcareworkerssixmonthspostvaccination AT piekarskaanna effectofcovid19onantisantibodyresponseinhealthcareworkerssixmonthspostvaccination AT zarebskamichalukdorota effectofcovid19onantisantibodyresponseinhealthcareworkerssixmonthspostvaccination |