Cargando…

A Cross-Provider Healthcare Management Program for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in 22 German Companies

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are among the most common cause for reduced work capacity and sick leave. Workplace health promotion programs are often neither tailored to the workplace nor the individual needs of the employees. To counteract lacking intersectional care, this four-year randomized c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna), Lindert, Lara, Schlomann, Lara, Samel, Christina, Hellmich, Martin, Pfaff, Holger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831600
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211844
_version_ 1784604793236357120
author Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
Lindert, Lara
Schlomann, Lara
Samel, Christina
Hellmich, Martin
Pfaff, Holger
author_facet Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
Lindert, Lara
Schlomann, Lara
Samel, Christina
Hellmich, Martin
Pfaff, Holger
author_sort Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
collection PubMed
description Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are among the most common cause for reduced work capacity and sick leave. Workplace health promotion programs are often neither tailored to the workplace nor the individual needs of the employees. To counteract lacking intersectional care, this four-year randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to investigate the effects of modular coordinating case management (treatment group) compared to supported self-management (control group) on MSD specific sick leave days (routine data), workability (WAI), self-efficacy (self-efficacy scale), and pain (German pain questionnaire, GPQ). The study network comprised 22 companies, 15 company health insurance funds, and 12 pension funds in Germany. Overall, 852 participants (Module A/early intervention: n = 651, Module B/rehabilitation: n = 190, Module C/reintegration: n = 10) participated. Both groups achieved fewer sick leave days, higher workability, and less pain (p < 0.0001) at follow-up compared to baseline. At follow-up, the coordinating case management group showed fewer disability days (GPQ), lower disability scores (GPQ), and lower pain intensities (GPQ) than the supported self-management group (p < 0.05), but no superiority regarding MSD specific sick leave days, workability, nor self-efficacy. Module A showed more comprehensive differences. The accompanying process evaluation shows barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the program, especially in a RCT setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8618626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86186262021-11-27 A Cross-Provider Healthcare Management Program for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in 22 German Companies Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna) Lindert, Lara Schlomann, Lara Samel, Christina Hellmich, Martin Pfaff, Holger Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) are among the most common cause for reduced work capacity and sick leave. Workplace health promotion programs are often neither tailored to the workplace nor the individual needs of the employees. To counteract lacking intersectional care, this four-year randomized controlled trial (RCT) aimed to investigate the effects of modular coordinating case management (treatment group) compared to supported self-management (control group) on MSD specific sick leave days (routine data), workability (WAI), self-efficacy (self-efficacy scale), and pain (German pain questionnaire, GPQ). The study network comprised 22 companies, 15 company health insurance funds, and 12 pension funds in Germany. Overall, 852 participants (Module A/early intervention: n = 651, Module B/rehabilitation: n = 190, Module C/reintegration: n = 10) participated. Both groups achieved fewer sick leave days, higher workability, and less pain (p < 0.0001) at follow-up compared to baseline. At follow-up, the coordinating case management group showed fewer disability days (GPQ), lower disability scores (GPQ), and lower pain intensities (GPQ) than the supported self-management group (p < 0.05), but no superiority regarding MSD specific sick leave days, workability, nor self-efficacy. Module A showed more comprehensive differences. The accompanying process evaluation shows barriers and facilitators for the implementation of the program, especially in a RCT setting. MDPI 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8618626/ /pubmed/34831600 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211844 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Kyung-Eun (Anna)
Lindert, Lara
Schlomann, Lara
Samel, Christina
Hellmich, Martin
Pfaff, Holger
A Cross-Provider Healthcare Management Program for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in 22 German Companies
title A Cross-Provider Healthcare Management Program for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in 22 German Companies
title_full A Cross-Provider Healthcare Management Program for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in 22 German Companies
title_fullStr A Cross-Provider Healthcare Management Program for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in 22 German Companies
title_full_unstemmed A Cross-Provider Healthcare Management Program for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in 22 German Companies
title_short A Cross-Provider Healthcare Management Program for Musculoskeletal Disorders: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial in 22 German Companies
title_sort cross-provider healthcare management program for musculoskeletal disorders: results of a randomized controlled trial in 22 german companies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831600
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211844
work_keys_str_mv AT choikyungeunanna acrossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT lindertlara acrossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT schlomannlara acrossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT samelchristina acrossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT hellmichmartin acrossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT pfaffholger acrossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT choikyungeunanna crossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT lindertlara crossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT schlomannlara crossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT samelchristina crossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT hellmichmartin crossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies
AT pfaffholger crossproviderhealthcaremanagementprogramformusculoskeletaldisordersresultsofarandomizedcontrolledtrialin22germancompanies