Cargando…
Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression
More than 50% of atypical meningiomas regrow within 5 years after surgery. FORGE score is a newly created tool to estimate the MIB-1 index in cranial meningiomas. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the predictive value of the FORGE score in combination with major diagnostic criteria of atypic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112011 |
_version_ | 1784604817305370624 |
---|---|
author | Wach, Johannes Lampmann, Tim Güresir, Ági Vatter, Hartmut Becker, Albert J. Hölzel, Michael Toma, Marieta Güresir, Erdem |
author_facet | Wach, Johannes Lampmann, Tim Güresir, Ági Vatter, Hartmut Becker, Albert J. Hölzel, Michael Toma, Marieta Güresir, Erdem |
author_sort | Wach, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | More than 50% of atypical meningiomas regrow within 5 years after surgery. FORGE score is a newly created tool to estimate the MIB-1 index in cranial meningiomas. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the predictive value of the FORGE score in combination with major diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma (brain invasion, mitotic count ≥ 4) regarding recurrence in atypical meningiomas. We included patients operated on primary atypical meningiomas in our center from 2011 to 2019. The study included 71 patients (58% women, median age 63 years). ROC curves revealed a superiority of FORGE score combined with histopathological diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma (AT-FORGE) in the prediction of tumor progression compared to FORGE score only (AUC: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54–0.91, cut-off: ≥5/<5, sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 78%). Patients with an AT-FORGE score ≥ 5 had a shorter time to tumor progression (32.8 vs. 71.4 months, p < 0.001) in the univariable analysis. Multivariable cox regression analysis revealed significant predictive value of Simpson grade > II, presence of multiple meningiomas and AT-FORGE score ≥ 5 for tumor progression. The combination of histopathological diagnostic criteria for atypical meningioma with FORGE score might facilitate an effective identification of patients with an atypical meningioma who have an increased risk of tumor progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8618726 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86187262021-11-27 Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression Wach, Johannes Lampmann, Tim Güresir, Ági Vatter, Hartmut Becker, Albert J. Hölzel, Michael Toma, Marieta Güresir, Erdem Diagnostics (Basel) Article More than 50% of atypical meningiomas regrow within 5 years after surgery. FORGE score is a newly created tool to estimate the MIB-1 index in cranial meningiomas. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the predictive value of the FORGE score in combination with major diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma (brain invasion, mitotic count ≥ 4) regarding recurrence in atypical meningiomas. We included patients operated on primary atypical meningiomas in our center from 2011 to 2019. The study included 71 patients (58% women, median age 63 years). ROC curves revealed a superiority of FORGE score combined with histopathological diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma (AT-FORGE) in the prediction of tumor progression compared to FORGE score only (AUC: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54–0.91, cut-off: ≥5/<5, sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 78%). Patients with an AT-FORGE score ≥ 5 had a shorter time to tumor progression (32.8 vs. 71.4 months, p < 0.001) in the univariable analysis. Multivariable cox regression analysis revealed significant predictive value of Simpson grade > II, presence of multiple meningiomas and AT-FORGE score ≥ 5 for tumor progression. The combination of histopathological diagnostic criteria for atypical meningioma with FORGE score might facilitate an effective identification of patients with an atypical meningioma who have an increased risk of tumor progression. MDPI 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8618726/ /pubmed/34829359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112011 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wach, Johannes Lampmann, Tim Güresir, Ági Vatter, Hartmut Becker, Albert J. Hölzel, Michael Toma, Marieta Güresir, Erdem Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression |
title | Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression |
title_full | Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression |
title_fullStr | Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression |
title_short | Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression |
title_sort | combining forge score and histopathological diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma enables risk stratification of tumor progression |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618726/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112011 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wachjohannes combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression AT lampmanntim combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression AT guresiragi combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression AT vatterhartmut combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression AT beckeralbertj combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression AT holzelmichael combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression AT tomamarieta combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression AT guresirerdem combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression |