Cargando…

Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression

More than 50% of atypical meningiomas regrow within 5 years after surgery. FORGE score is a newly created tool to estimate the MIB-1 index in cranial meningiomas. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the predictive value of the FORGE score in combination with major diagnostic criteria of atypic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wach, Johannes, Lampmann, Tim, Güresir, Ági, Vatter, Hartmut, Becker, Albert J., Hölzel, Michael, Toma, Marieta, Güresir, Erdem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112011
_version_ 1784604817305370624
author Wach, Johannes
Lampmann, Tim
Güresir, Ági
Vatter, Hartmut
Becker, Albert J.
Hölzel, Michael
Toma, Marieta
Güresir, Erdem
author_facet Wach, Johannes
Lampmann, Tim
Güresir, Ági
Vatter, Hartmut
Becker, Albert J.
Hölzel, Michael
Toma, Marieta
Güresir, Erdem
author_sort Wach, Johannes
collection PubMed
description More than 50% of atypical meningiomas regrow within 5 years after surgery. FORGE score is a newly created tool to estimate the MIB-1 index in cranial meningiomas. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the predictive value of the FORGE score in combination with major diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma (brain invasion, mitotic count ≥ 4) regarding recurrence in atypical meningiomas. We included patients operated on primary atypical meningiomas in our center from 2011 to 2019. The study included 71 patients (58% women, median age 63 years). ROC curves revealed a superiority of FORGE score combined with histopathological diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma (AT-FORGE) in the prediction of tumor progression compared to FORGE score only (AUC: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54–0.91, cut-off: ≥5/<5, sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 78%). Patients with an AT-FORGE score ≥ 5 had a shorter time to tumor progression (32.8 vs. 71.4 months, p < 0.001) in the univariable analysis. Multivariable cox regression analysis revealed significant predictive value of Simpson grade > II, presence of multiple meningiomas and AT-FORGE score ≥ 5 for tumor progression. The combination of histopathological diagnostic criteria for atypical meningioma with FORGE score might facilitate an effective identification of patients with an atypical meningioma who have an increased risk of tumor progression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8618726
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86187262021-11-27 Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression Wach, Johannes Lampmann, Tim Güresir, Ági Vatter, Hartmut Becker, Albert J. Hölzel, Michael Toma, Marieta Güresir, Erdem Diagnostics (Basel) Article More than 50% of atypical meningiomas regrow within 5 years after surgery. FORGE score is a newly created tool to estimate the MIB-1 index in cranial meningiomas. In this investigation, we aimed to assess the predictive value of the FORGE score in combination with major diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma (brain invasion, mitotic count ≥ 4) regarding recurrence in atypical meningiomas. We included patients operated on primary atypical meningiomas in our center from 2011 to 2019. The study included 71 patients (58% women, median age 63 years). ROC curves revealed a superiority of FORGE score combined with histopathological diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma (AT-FORGE) in the prediction of tumor progression compared to FORGE score only (AUC: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.54–0.91, cut-off: ≥5/<5, sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 78%). Patients with an AT-FORGE score ≥ 5 had a shorter time to tumor progression (32.8 vs. 71.4 months, p < 0.001) in the univariable analysis. Multivariable cox regression analysis revealed significant predictive value of Simpson grade > II, presence of multiple meningiomas and AT-FORGE score ≥ 5 for tumor progression. The combination of histopathological diagnostic criteria for atypical meningioma with FORGE score might facilitate an effective identification of patients with an atypical meningioma who have an increased risk of tumor progression. MDPI 2021-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8618726/ /pubmed/34829359 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112011 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wach, Johannes
Lampmann, Tim
Güresir, Ági
Vatter, Hartmut
Becker, Albert J.
Hölzel, Michael
Toma, Marieta
Güresir, Erdem
Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression
title Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression
title_full Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression
title_fullStr Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression
title_full_unstemmed Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression
title_short Combining FORGE Score and Histopathological Diagnostic Criteria of Atypical Meningioma Enables Risk Stratification of Tumor Progression
title_sort combining forge score and histopathological diagnostic criteria of atypical meningioma enables risk stratification of tumor progression
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618726/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829359
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112011
work_keys_str_mv AT wachjohannes combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression
AT lampmanntim combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression
AT guresiragi combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression
AT vatterhartmut combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression
AT beckeralbertj combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression
AT holzelmichael combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression
AT tomamarieta combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression
AT guresirerdem combiningforgescoreandhistopathologicaldiagnosticcriteriaofatypicalmeningiomaenablesriskstratificationoftumorprogression