Cargando…
COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses
Background: Vaccine hesitancy represents one of the major global health issues around the world. We examined the perception, attitude, perceived barriers and facilitation measures of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in a Chinese population with free vaccine choices (Sinovac [Coronavac] vs. BioNTech/Fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111250 |
_version_ | 1784604856605999104 |
---|---|
author | Wong, Martin C. S. Wong, Eliza L. Y. Cheung, Annie W. L. Huang, Junjie Lai, Christopher K. C. Yeoh, Eng Kiong Chan, Paul K. S. |
author_facet | Wong, Martin C. S. Wong, Eliza L. Y. Cheung, Annie W. L. Huang, Junjie Lai, Christopher K. C. Yeoh, Eng Kiong Chan, Paul K. S. |
author_sort | Wong, Martin C. S. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Vaccine hesitancy represents one of the major global health issues around the world. We examined the perception, attitude, perceived barriers and facilitation measures of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in a Chinese population with free vaccine choices (Sinovac [Coronavac] vs. BioNTech/Fosun [Comirnaty]) and adequate doses. Method: We conducted a random telephone survey of the general population in 1195 subjects aged 18 years or above from 23 April 2021 to 8 May 2021 after two months of vaccine rollout. A descriptive analysis of the levels of enabling factors, obstacles and perception of COVID-19 vaccination was conducted using ANOVA and Chi-square tests for trend. Results: Only 10.1% and 13.5% had received one and two COVID-19 vaccine doses, respectively. Among those who had not received any COVID-19 vaccine (75.4%), only 25.1% expressed their intention to receive in the coming 6 months. The barriers with the highest scores included “having heard of cases with serious adverse events or death after vaccination” (score: 8.17 out 10, 95% C.I. 7.99, 8.35), “lack of confidence on governmental recommendations” (7.69, 95% C.I. 7.47, 7.91), and “waiting for a better vaccine” (7.29, 95% C.I. 7.07, 7.52). The highest score for the impact of various incentives for vaccination was for “vaccine passports for overseas travel” (4.44, 95% C.I. 4.18, 4.71). Conclusions: Vaccine hesitancy is commonly observed in this Chinese population despite adequate provision of vaccine doses and choices. No single incentive is strong enough to promote vaccination, and multiple facilitation measures for different groups of population are needed to encourage vaccine uptake. Active clarification and promotion by medical professionals together with a variety of incentives are needed to drive vaccine uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8618889 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86188892021-11-27 COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses Wong, Martin C. S. Wong, Eliza L. Y. Cheung, Annie W. L. Huang, Junjie Lai, Christopher K. C. Yeoh, Eng Kiong Chan, Paul K. S. Vaccines (Basel) Article Background: Vaccine hesitancy represents one of the major global health issues around the world. We examined the perception, attitude, perceived barriers and facilitation measures of receiving the COVID-19 vaccine in a Chinese population with free vaccine choices (Sinovac [Coronavac] vs. BioNTech/Fosun [Comirnaty]) and adequate doses. Method: We conducted a random telephone survey of the general population in 1195 subjects aged 18 years or above from 23 April 2021 to 8 May 2021 after two months of vaccine rollout. A descriptive analysis of the levels of enabling factors, obstacles and perception of COVID-19 vaccination was conducted using ANOVA and Chi-square tests for trend. Results: Only 10.1% and 13.5% had received one and two COVID-19 vaccine doses, respectively. Among those who had not received any COVID-19 vaccine (75.4%), only 25.1% expressed their intention to receive in the coming 6 months. The barriers with the highest scores included “having heard of cases with serious adverse events or death after vaccination” (score: 8.17 out 10, 95% C.I. 7.99, 8.35), “lack of confidence on governmental recommendations” (7.69, 95% C.I. 7.47, 7.91), and “waiting for a better vaccine” (7.29, 95% C.I. 7.07, 7.52). The highest score for the impact of various incentives for vaccination was for “vaccine passports for overseas travel” (4.44, 95% C.I. 4.18, 4.71). Conclusions: Vaccine hesitancy is commonly observed in this Chinese population despite adequate provision of vaccine doses and choices. No single incentive is strong enough to promote vaccination, and multiple facilitation measures for different groups of population are needed to encourage vaccine uptake. Active clarification and promotion by medical professionals together with a variety of incentives are needed to drive vaccine uptake. MDPI 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8618889/ /pubmed/34835181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111250 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wong, Martin C. S. Wong, Eliza L. Y. Cheung, Annie W. L. Huang, Junjie Lai, Christopher K. C. Yeoh, Eng Kiong Chan, Paul K. S. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses |
title | COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses |
title_full | COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses |
title_short | COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in a City with Free Choice and Sufficient Doses |
title_sort | covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in a city with free choice and sufficient doses |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618889/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongmartincs covid19vaccinehesitancyinacitywithfreechoiceandsufficientdoses AT wongelizaly covid19vaccinehesitancyinacitywithfreechoiceandsufficientdoses AT cheunganniewl covid19vaccinehesitancyinacitywithfreechoiceandsufficientdoses AT huangjunjie covid19vaccinehesitancyinacitywithfreechoiceandsufficientdoses AT laichristopherkc covid19vaccinehesitancyinacitywithfreechoiceandsufficientdoses AT yeohengkiong covid19vaccinehesitancyinacitywithfreechoiceandsufficientdoses AT chanpaulks covid19vaccinehesitancyinacitywithfreechoiceandsufficientdoses |