Cargando…
Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics
Sample preparation is the most critical step in proteomics as it directly affects the subset of proteins and peptides that can be reliably identified and quantified. Although a variety of efficient and reproducible sample preparation strategies have been developed, their applicability and efficacy d...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226816 |
_version_ | 1784604880204201984 |
---|---|
author | Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja Wölk, Michele Hoffmann, Ralf |
author_facet | Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja Wölk, Michele Hoffmann, Ralf |
author_sort | Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja |
collection | PubMed |
description | Sample preparation is the most critical step in proteomics as it directly affects the subset of proteins and peptides that can be reliably identified and quantified. Although a variety of efficient and reproducible sample preparation strategies have been developed, their applicability and efficacy depends much on the biological sample. Here, three approaches were evaluated for the human milk and plasma proteomes. Protein extracts were digested either in an ultrafiltration unit (filter-aided sample preparation, FASP) or in-solution (ISD). ISD samples were desalted by solid-phase extraction prior to nRPC-ESI-MS/MS. Additionally, milk and plasma samples were directly digested by FASP without prior protein precipitation. Each strategy provided inherent advantages and disadvantages for milk and plasma. FASP appeared to be the most time efficient procedure with a low miscleavage rate when used for a biological sample aliquot, but quantitation was less reproducible. A prior protein precipitation step improved the quantitation by FASP due to significantly higher peak areas for plasma and a much better reproducibility for milk. Moreover, the miscleavage rate for milk, the identification rate for plasma, and the carbamidomethylation efficiency were improved. In contrast, ISD of both milk and plasma resulted in higher miscleavage rates and is therefore less suitable for targeted proteomics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8618985 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86189852021-11-27 Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja Wölk, Michele Hoffmann, Ralf Molecules Article Sample preparation is the most critical step in proteomics as it directly affects the subset of proteins and peptides that can be reliably identified and quantified. Although a variety of efficient and reproducible sample preparation strategies have been developed, their applicability and efficacy depends much on the biological sample. Here, three approaches were evaluated for the human milk and plasma proteomes. Protein extracts were digested either in an ultrafiltration unit (filter-aided sample preparation, FASP) or in-solution (ISD). ISD samples were desalted by solid-phase extraction prior to nRPC-ESI-MS/MS. Additionally, milk and plasma samples were directly digested by FASP without prior protein precipitation. Each strategy provided inherent advantages and disadvantages for milk and plasma. FASP appeared to be the most time efficient procedure with a low miscleavage rate when used for a biological sample aliquot, but quantitation was less reproducible. A prior protein precipitation step improved the quantitation by FASP due to significantly higher peak areas for plasma and a much better reproducibility for milk. Moreover, the miscleavage rate for milk, the identification rate for plasma, and the carbamidomethylation efficiency were improved. In contrast, ISD of both milk and plasma resulted in higher miscleavage rates and is therefore less suitable for targeted proteomics. MDPI 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8618985/ /pubmed/34833908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226816 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja Wölk, Michele Hoffmann, Ralf Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics |
title | Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics |
title_full | Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics |
title_short | Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics |
title_sort | evaluation of sample preparation strategies for human milk and plasma proteomics |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618985/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226816 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT milkovskastamenovasanja evaluationofsamplepreparationstrategiesforhumanmilkandplasmaproteomics AT wolkmichele evaluationofsamplepreparationstrategiesforhumanmilkandplasmaproteomics AT hoffmannralf evaluationofsamplepreparationstrategiesforhumanmilkandplasmaproteomics |