Cargando…

Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics

Sample preparation is the most critical step in proteomics as it directly affects the subset of proteins and peptides that can be reliably identified and quantified. Although a variety of efficient and reproducible sample preparation strategies have been developed, their applicability and efficacy d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja, Wölk, Michele, Hoffmann, Ralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226816
_version_ 1784604880204201984
author Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja
Wölk, Michele
Hoffmann, Ralf
author_facet Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja
Wölk, Michele
Hoffmann, Ralf
author_sort Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja
collection PubMed
description Sample preparation is the most critical step in proteomics as it directly affects the subset of proteins and peptides that can be reliably identified and quantified. Although a variety of efficient and reproducible sample preparation strategies have been developed, their applicability and efficacy depends much on the biological sample. Here, three approaches were evaluated for the human milk and plasma proteomes. Protein extracts were digested either in an ultrafiltration unit (filter-aided sample preparation, FASP) or in-solution (ISD). ISD samples were desalted by solid-phase extraction prior to nRPC-ESI-MS/MS. Additionally, milk and plasma samples were directly digested by FASP without prior protein precipitation. Each strategy provided inherent advantages and disadvantages for milk and plasma. FASP appeared to be the most time efficient procedure with a low miscleavage rate when used for a biological sample aliquot, but quantitation was less reproducible. A prior protein precipitation step improved the quantitation by FASP due to significantly higher peak areas for plasma and a much better reproducibility for milk. Moreover, the miscleavage rate for milk, the identification rate for plasma, and the carbamidomethylation efficiency were improved. In contrast, ISD of both milk and plasma resulted in higher miscleavage rates and is therefore less suitable for targeted proteomics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8618985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86189852021-11-27 Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja Wölk, Michele Hoffmann, Ralf Molecules Article Sample preparation is the most critical step in proteomics as it directly affects the subset of proteins and peptides that can be reliably identified and quantified. Although a variety of efficient and reproducible sample preparation strategies have been developed, their applicability and efficacy depends much on the biological sample. Here, three approaches were evaluated for the human milk and plasma proteomes. Protein extracts were digested either in an ultrafiltration unit (filter-aided sample preparation, FASP) or in-solution (ISD). ISD samples were desalted by solid-phase extraction prior to nRPC-ESI-MS/MS. Additionally, milk and plasma samples were directly digested by FASP without prior protein precipitation. Each strategy provided inherent advantages and disadvantages for milk and plasma. FASP appeared to be the most time efficient procedure with a low miscleavage rate when used for a biological sample aliquot, but quantitation was less reproducible. A prior protein precipitation step improved the quantitation by FASP due to significantly higher peak areas for plasma and a much better reproducibility for milk. Moreover, the miscleavage rate for milk, the identification rate for plasma, and the carbamidomethylation efficiency were improved. In contrast, ISD of both milk and plasma resulted in higher miscleavage rates and is therefore less suitable for targeted proteomics. MDPI 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8618985/ /pubmed/34833908 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226816 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Milkovska-Stamenova, Sanja
Wölk, Michele
Hoffmann, Ralf
Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics
title Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics
title_full Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics
title_fullStr Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics
title_short Evaluation of Sample Preparation Strategies for Human Milk and Plasma Proteomics
title_sort evaluation of sample preparation strategies for human milk and plasma proteomics
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8618985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833908
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules26226816
work_keys_str_mv AT milkovskastamenovasanja evaluationofsamplepreparationstrategiesforhumanmilkandplasmaproteomics
AT wolkmichele evaluationofsamplepreparationstrategiesforhumanmilkandplasmaproteomics
AT hoffmannralf evaluationofsamplepreparationstrategiesforhumanmilkandplasmaproteomics