Cargando…
Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Although gastroschisis is often diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, there is still a gap in the literature about which prenatal ultrasound markers can predict complex gastroschisis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the ultrasound markers that characterize complex gastrosch...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8619043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225215 |
_version_ | 1784604894055890944 |
---|---|
author | Ferreira, Rui Gilberto Mendonça, Carolina Rodrigues de Moraes, Carolina Leão de Abreu Tacon, Fernanda Sardinha Ramos, Lelia Luanne Gonçalves e Melo, Natalia Cruz Sbragia, Lourenço do Amaral, Waldemar Naves Ruano, Rodrigo |
author_facet | Ferreira, Rui Gilberto Mendonça, Carolina Rodrigues de Moraes, Carolina Leão de Abreu Tacon, Fernanda Sardinha Ramos, Lelia Luanne Gonçalves e Melo, Natalia Cruz Sbragia, Lourenço do Amaral, Waldemar Naves Ruano, Rodrigo |
author_sort | Ferreira, Rui Gilberto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Although gastroschisis is often diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, there is still a gap in the literature about which prenatal ultrasound markers can predict complex gastroschisis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the ultrasound markers that characterize complex gastroschisis. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA. The protocol was registered (PROSPERO ID CRD42020211685). Meta-analysis was displayed graphically on Forest plots, which estimate prevalence rates and risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals, using STATA version 15.0. The combined prevalence of intestinal complications in fetuses with complex gastroschisis was 27.0%, with a higher prevalence of atresia (about 48%), followed by necrosis (about 25%). The prevalence of deaths in newborns with complex gastroschisis was 15.0%. The predictive ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis were intraabdominal bowel dilatation (IABD) (RR 3.01, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.07; I(2) = 15.7%), extra-abdominal bowel dilatation (EABD) (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.39; I(2) = 77.1%), and polyhydramnios (RR 3.81, 95% CI 2.09 to 6.95; I(2) = 0.0%). This review identified that IABD, EABD, and polyhydramnios were considered predictive ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis. However, evidence regarding gestational age at the time of diagnosis is needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8619043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86190432021-11-27 Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Ferreira, Rui Gilberto Mendonça, Carolina Rodrigues de Moraes, Carolina Leão de Abreu Tacon, Fernanda Sardinha Ramos, Lelia Luanne Gonçalves e Melo, Natalia Cruz Sbragia, Lourenço do Amaral, Waldemar Naves Ruano, Rodrigo J Clin Med Review Although gastroschisis is often diagnosed by prenatal ultrasound, there is still a gap in the literature about which prenatal ultrasound markers can predict complex gastroschisis. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the ultrasound markers that characterize complex gastroschisis. A systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the guidelines of PRISMA. The protocol was registered (PROSPERO ID CRD42020211685). Meta-analysis was displayed graphically on Forest plots, which estimate prevalence rates and risk ratios, with 95% confidence intervals, using STATA version 15.0. The combined prevalence of intestinal complications in fetuses with complex gastroschisis was 27.0%, with a higher prevalence of atresia (about 48%), followed by necrosis (about 25%). The prevalence of deaths in newborns with complex gastroschisis was 15.0%. The predictive ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis were intraabdominal bowel dilatation (IABD) (RR 3.01, 95% CI 2.22 to 4.07; I(2) = 15.7%), extra-abdominal bowel dilatation (EABD) (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01 to 2.39; I(2) = 77.1%), and polyhydramnios (RR 3.81, 95% CI 2.09 to 6.95; I(2) = 0.0%). This review identified that IABD, EABD, and polyhydramnios were considered predictive ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis. However, evidence regarding gestational age at the time of diagnosis is needed. MDPI 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8619043/ /pubmed/34830497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225215 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ferreira, Rui Gilberto Mendonça, Carolina Rodrigues de Moraes, Carolina Leão de Abreu Tacon, Fernanda Sardinha Ramos, Lelia Luanne Gonçalves e Melo, Natalia Cruz Sbragia, Lourenço do Amaral, Waldemar Naves Ruano, Rodrigo Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Ultrasound Markers for Complex Gastroschisis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | ultrasound markers for complex gastroschisis: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8619043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225215 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferreiraruigilberto ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mendoncacarolinarodrigues ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT demoraescarolinaleao ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT deabreutaconfernandasardinha ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ramoslelialuannegoncalves ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT emelonataliacruz ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sbragialourenco ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT doamaralwaldemarnaves ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ruanorodrigo ultrasoundmarkersforcomplexgastroschisisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |