Cargando…

Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC

This study presents the development and content validation of an instrument assessing the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. The study consists of three stages: (i) Selection and definition of the component dimensions and areas, construction of items assessing these dimensions, a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús, Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán, García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8619169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111459
_version_ 1784604925051797504
author Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús
Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán
García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel
author_facet Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús
Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán
García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel
author_sort Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús
collection PubMed
description This study presents the development and content validation of an instrument assessing the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. The study consists of three stages: (i) Selection and definition of the component dimensions and areas, construction of items assessing these dimensions, administration instructions, and qualitative criteria for assigning diagnoses; (ii) Face validity and content validity; (iii) Pilot test. The tentative questionnaire was designed using two defining characteristics of the NANDA-I (“Impaired verbal communication” and “Readiness for enhanced communication”) and the NOC outcome indicators “Communication”, “Communication: Expressive”, “Communication: Receptive”, and “Information Processing”. The areas and items reached initial content validity index (CVI) and representativeness index (RI) values of 0.87 and above. Those that did not reach the expected values were modified after expert review. The resulting questionnaire was pilot-tested for feasibility and administration times. An instrument containing five dimensions, fourteen areas, and 43 items was obtained and administered in 15 (12–31) minutes. A panel of experts evaluated the final questionnaire (CEECCA), awarding its areas and items CVI and RI values of 0.90 and above. In the absence of further psychometric studies, the questionnaire appears to be useful for assessing ability to communicate in individuals with aphasia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8619169
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86191692021-11-27 Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel Healthcare (Basel) Article This study presents the development and content validation of an instrument assessing the ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia. The study consists of three stages: (i) Selection and definition of the component dimensions and areas, construction of items assessing these dimensions, administration instructions, and qualitative criteria for assigning diagnoses; (ii) Face validity and content validity; (iii) Pilot test. The tentative questionnaire was designed using two defining characteristics of the NANDA-I (“Impaired verbal communication” and “Readiness for enhanced communication”) and the NOC outcome indicators “Communication”, “Communication: Expressive”, “Communication: Receptive”, and “Information Processing”. The areas and items reached initial content validity index (CVI) and representativeness index (RI) values of 0.87 and above. Those that did not reach the expected values were modified after expert review. The resulting questionnaire was pilot-tested for feasibility and administration times. An instrument containing five dimensions, fourteen areas, and 43 items was obtained and administered in 15 (12–31) minutes. A panel of experts evaluated the final questionnaire (CEECCA), awarding its areas and items CVI and RI values of 0.90 and above. In the absence of further psychometric studies, the questionnaire appears to be useful for assessing ability to communicate in individuals with aphasia. MDPI 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8619169/ /pubmed/34828504 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111459 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Martín-Dorta, Willian-Jesús
Brito-Brito, Pedro-Ruymán
García-Hernández, Alfonso-Miguel
Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_full Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_fullStr Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_full_unstemmed Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_short Development and Content Validation of the CEECCA Questionnaire to Assess Ability to Communicate among Individuals with Aphasia Based on the NANDA-I and NOC
title_sort development and content validation of the ceecca questionnaire to assess ability to communicate among individuals with aphasia based on the nanda-i and noc
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8619169/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828504
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111459
work_keys_str_mv AT martindortawillianjesus developmentandcontentvalidationoftheceeccaquestionnairetoassessabilitytocommunicateamongindividualswithaphasiabasedonthenandaiandnoc
AT britobritopedroruyman developmentandcontentvalidationoftheceeccaquestionnairetoassessabilitytocommunicateamongindividualswithaphasiabasedonthenandaiandnoc
AT garciahernandezalfonsomiguel developmentandcontentvalidationoftheceeccaquestionnairetoassessabilitytocommunicateamongindividualswithaphasiabasedonthenandaiandnoc