Cargando…

Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations

Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic evaluations of various geothermal configurations are reported. The main operational and economic parameters of the cycles are evaluated and compared. Multi-objective optimization of the cycles is conducted using the artificial bee colony algorithm. A sensitivity as...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shamoushaki, Moein, Aliehyaei, Mehdi, Rosen, Marc A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23111483
_version_ 1784605171737690112
author Shamoushaki, Moein
Aliehyaei, Mehdi
Rosen, Marc A.
author_facet Shamoushaki, Moein
Aliehyaei, Mehdi
Rosen, Marc A.
author_sort Shamoushaki, Moein
collection PubMed
description Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic evaluations of various geothermal configurations are reported. The main operational and economic parameters of the cycles are evaluated and compared. Multi-objective optimization of the cycles is conducted using the artificial bee colony algorithm. A sensitivity assessment is carried out on the effect of production well temperature variation on system performance from energy and economic perspectives. The results show that the flash-binary cycle has the highest thermal and exergy efficiencies, at 15.6% and 64.3%, respectively. The highest generated power cost and pay-back period are attributable to the simple organic Rankine cycle (ORC). Raising the well-temperature can increase the exergy destruction rate in all configurations. However, the electricity cost and pay-back period decrease. Based on the results, in all cases, the exergoenvironmental impact improvement factor decreases, and the temperature rises. The exergy destruction ratio and efficiency of all components for each configuration are calculated and compared. It is found that, at the optimum state, the exergy efficiencies of the simple organic Rankine cycle, single flash, double flash, and flash-binary cycles respectively are 14.7%, 14.4%, 12.6%, and 14.1% higher than their relevant base cases, while the pay-back periods are 10.6%, 1.5% 1.4%, and 0.6% lower than the base cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8620239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86202392021-11-27 Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations Shamoushaki, Moein Aliehyaei, Mehdi Rosen, Marc A. Entropy (Basel) Article Energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic evaluations of various geothermal configurations are reported. The main operational and economic parameters of the cycles are evaluated and compared. Multi-objective optimization of the cycles is conducted using the artificial bee colony algorithm. A sensitivity assessment is carried out on the effect of production well temperature variation on system performance from energy and economic perspectives. The results show that the flash-binary cycle has the highest thermal and exergy efficiencies, at 15.6% and 64.3%, respectively. The highest generated power cost and pay-back period are attributable to the simple organic Rankine cycle (ORC). Raising the well-temperature can increase the exergy destruction rate in all configurations. However, the electricity cost and pay-back period decrease. Based on the results, in all cases, the exergoenvironmental impact improvement factor decreases, and the temperature rises. The exergy destruction ratio and efficiency of all components for each configuration are calculated and compared. It is found that, at the optimum state, the exergy efficiencies of the simple organic Rankine cycle, single flash, double flash, and flash-binary cycles respectively are 14.7%, 14.4%, 12.6%, and 14.1% higher than their relevant base cases, while the pay-back periods are 10.6%, 1.5% 1.4%, and 0.6% lower than the base cases. MDPI 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8620239/ /pubmed/34828181 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23111483 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Shamoushaki, Moein
Aliehyaei, Mehdi
Rosen, Marc A.
Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations
title Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations
title_full Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations
title_fullStr Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations
title_full_unstemmed Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations
title_short Energy, Exergy, Exergoeconomic and Exergoenvironmental Impact Analyses and Optimization of Various Geothermal Power Cycle Configurations
title_sort energy, exergy, exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental impact analyses and optimization of various geothermal power cycle configurations
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828181
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23111483
work_keys_str_mv AT shamoushakimoein energyexergyexergoeconomicandexergoenvironmentalimpactanalysesandoptimizationofvariousgeothermalpowercycleconfigurations
AT aliehyaeimehdi energyexergyexergoeconomicandexergoenvironmentalimpactanalysesandoptimizationofvariousgeothermalpowercycleconfigurations
AT rosenmarca energyexergyexergoeconomicandexergoenvironmentalimpactanalysesandoptimizationofvariousgeothermalpowercycleconfigurations