Cargando…
Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission
The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a major endoscopic scoring system used to assign a status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Using interobserver reliability (IOR), this study clarified the difficulties for endoscopic observers imposed by MES...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111405 |
_version_ | 1784605173359837184 |
---|---|
author | Kanazawa, Mimari Tominaga, Keiichi Yamamiya, Akira Tanaka, Takanao Watanabe, Shoko Sugaya, Takeshi Abe, Keiichiro Kanamori, Akira Arisaka, Takahiro Hoshi, Koki Iijima, Makoto Goda, Kenichi Haruyama, Yasuo Irisawa, Atsushi |
author_facet | Kanazawa, Mimari Tominaga, Keiichi Yamamiya, Akira Tanaka, Takanao Watanabe, Shoko Sugaya, Takeshi Abe, Keiichiro Kanamori, Akira Arisaka, Takahiro Hoshi, Koki Iijima, Makoto Goda, Kenichi Haruyama, Yasuo Irisawa, Atsushi |
author_sort | Kanazawa, Mimari |
collection | PubMed |
description | The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a major endoscopic scoring system used to assign a status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Using interobserver reliability (IOR), this study clarified the difficulties for endoscopic observers imposed by MES parameters used for the endoscopic evaluation of UC in histological remission. First, 42 endoscopists of four observer groups examined each MES parameter, which were evaluated from endoscopically obtained images of 100 cases as Grade 0 or 1 of the Nancy histological index of histopathological inflammation. Then, IOR was assessed using multiple κ statistics for each finding of MES. The results showed that IOR among all the observers was slight or fair for all the parameters, indicating a low IOR. The experts of the UC practice group had “moderate” or higher IOR for seven of the nine parameters, whereas “slight” or “fair” results were found for all parameters by the trainee group. The IOR for each MES parameter was calculated separately for the observer groups. All the groups showed “slight” or “fair” for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. Large differences between the endoscopists were found in the IOR for the MES parameters in UC in histological remission. Even among UC practice experts, the IOR was low for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8620245 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86202452021-11-27 Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission Kanazawa, Mimari Tominaga, Keiichi Yamamiya, Akira Tanaka, Takanao Watanabe, Shoko Sugaya, Takeshi Abe, Keiichiro Kanamori, Akira Arisaka, Takahiro Hoshi, Koki Iijima, Makoto Goda, Kenichi Haruyama, Yasuo Irisawa, Atsushi Healthcare (Basel) Article The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is a major endoscopic scoring system used to assign a status of mucosal inflammation and disease activity to patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Using interobserver reliability (IOR), this study clarified the difficulties for endoscopic observers imposed by MES parameters used for the endoscopic evaluation of UC in histological remission. First, 42 endoscopists of four observer groups examined each MES parameter, which were evaluated from endoscopically obtained images of 100 cases as Grade 0 or 1 of the Nancy histological index of histopathological inflammation. Then, IOR was assessed using multiple κ statistics for each finding of MES. The results showed that IOR among all the observers was slight or fair for all the parameters, indicating a low IOR. The experts of the UC practice group had “moderate” or higher IOR for seven of the nine parameters, whereas “slight” or “fair” results were found for all parameters by the trainee group. The IOR for each MES parameter was calculated separately for the observer groups. All the groups showed “slight” or “fair” for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. Large differences between the endoscopists were found in the IOR for the MES parameters in UC in histological remission. Even among UC practice experts, the IOR was low for “Erythema” and “Decreased vascular pattern”. MDPI 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8620245/ /pubmed/34828451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111405 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kanazawa, Mimari Tominaga, Keiichi Yamamiya, Akira Tanaka, Takanao Watanabe, Shoko Sugaya, Takeshi Abe, Keiichiro Kanamori, Akira Arisaka, Takahiro Hoshi, Koki Iijima, Makoto Goda, Kenichi Haruyama, Yasuo Irisawa, Atsushi Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title | Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_full | Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_short | Analysis of Endoscopic Evaluation Reliability for Ulcerative Colitis in Histological Remission |
title_sort | analysis of endoscopic evaluation reliability for ulcerative colitis in histological remission |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620245/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828451 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kanazawamimari analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT tominagakeiichi analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT yamamiyaakira analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT tanakatakanao analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT watanabeshoko analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT sugayatakeshi analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT abekeiichiro analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT kanamoriakira analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT arisakatakahiro analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT hoshikoki analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT iijimamakoto analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT godakenichi analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT haruyamayasuo analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission AT irisawaatsushi analysisofendoscopicevaluationreliabilityforulcerativecolitisinhistologicalremission |