Cargando…

Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung: Geeignete Analyseinstrumente für das Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen

BACKGROUND: The aim of the risk assessment for mental stress is to evaluate the hazards associated with the work in order to derive measures for the healthy design of the work. The range of procedures for assessment of mental stress is, however, extensive and unclear. Against this background, this a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kersten, Maren, Kozak, Agnessa, Adler, Mareike, Wohlert, Claudia, Stamer, Susanne, Gregersen, Sabine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40664-021-00450-w
_version_ 1784605191298875392
author Kersten, Maren
Kozak, Agnessa
Adler, Mareike
Wohlert, Claudia
Stamer, Susanne
Gregersen, Sabine
author_facet Kersten, Maren
Kozak, Agnessa
Adler, Mareike
Wohlert, Claudia
Stamer, Susanne
Gregersen, Sabine
author_sort Kersten, Maren
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of the risk assessment for mental stress is to evaluate the hazards associated with the work in order to derive measures for the healthy design of the work. The range of procedures for assessment of mental stress is, however, extensive and unclear. Against this background, this article presents a reduced and structured overview of instruments for social and healthcare services. METHODS: A comprehensive search was carried out to identify appropriate tools. Prior to beginning the search, criteria were defined to test the suitability of the identified tools. For one thing, there are minimum requirements that must be fulfilled so that the tool is accepted for the review process. There are also structuring criteria that can be divided into descriptive and evaluative aspects. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 83 instruments for risk assessment of mental stress (GBU Psyche), of which 58 were accepted for a further suitability review process following initial evaluation. The comprehensive review of 44 services from the nonsystematic search has so far been completed. Of these, 19 procedures were deemed suitable and are presented in a structured overview matrix. The review of the 14 procedures from the systematic search is projected to be finished by mid-2022 and is part of the continual review process. DISCUSSION: The numerous procedures identified for risk assessment of mental stress clearly show that it is reasonable and relevant to find a limited selection of tools that have been tested in practice and are quality assured. The criteria for evaluating the tools, which are also presented in this article, render this selection transparent.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8620315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86203152021-11-26 Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung: Geeignete Analyseinstrumente für das Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen Kersten, Maren Kozak, Agnessa Adler, Mareike Wohlert, Claudia Stamer, Susanne Gregersen, Sabine Zentralbl Arbeitsmed Arbeitsschutz Ergon Übersichten: Arbeitsmedizin BACKGROUND: The aim of the risk assessment for mental stress is to evaluate the hazards associated with the work in order to derive measures for the healthy design of the work. The range of procedures for assessment of mental stress is, however, extensive and unclear. Against this background, this article presents a reduced and structured overview of instruments for social and healthcare services. METHODS: A comprehensive search was carried out to identify appropriate tools. Prior to beginning the search, criteria were defined to test the suitability of the identified tools. For one thing, there are minimum requirements that must be fulfilled so that the tool is accepted for the review process. There are also structuring criteria that can be divided into descriptive and evaluative aspects. RESULTS: The search identified a total of 83 instruments for risk assessment of mental stress (GBU Psyche), of which 58 were accepted for a further suitability review process following initial evaluation. The comprehensive review of 44 services from the nonsystematic search has so far been completed. Of these, 19 procedures were deemed suitable and are presented in a structured overview matrix. The review of the 14 procedures from the systematic search is projected to be finished by mid-2022 and is part of the continual review process. DISCUSSION: The numerous procedures identified for risk assessment of mental stress clearly show that it is reasonable and relevant to find a limited selection of tools that have been tested in practice and are quality assured. The criteria for evaluating the tools, which are also presented in this article, render this selection transparent. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-11-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8620315/ /pubmed/34848927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40664-021-00450-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Übersichten: Arbeitsmedizin
Kersten, Maren
Kozak, Agnessa
Adler, Mareike
Wohlert, Claudia
Stamer, Susanne
Gregersen, Sabine
Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung: Geeignete Analyseinstrumente für das Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen
title Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung: Geeignete Analyseinstrumente für das Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen
title_full Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung: Geeignete Analyseinstrumente für das Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen
title_fullStr Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung: Geeignete Analyseinstrumente für das Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen
title_full_unstemmed Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung: Geeignete Analyseinstrumente für das Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen
title_short Gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer Belastung: Geeignete Analyseinstrumente für das Sozial- und Gesundheitswesen
title_sort gefährdungsbeurteilung psychischer belastung: geeignete analyseinstrumente für das sozial- und gesundheitswesen
topic Übersichten: Arbeitsmedizin
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34848927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40664-021-00450-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kerstenmaren gefahrdungsbeurteilungpsychischerbelastunggeeigneteanalyseinstrumentefurdassozialundgesundheitswesen
AT kozakagnessa gefahrdungsbeurteilungpsychischerbelastunggeeigneteanalyseinstrumentefurdassozialundgesundheitswesen
AT adlermareike gefahrdungsbeurteilungpsychischerbelastunggeeigneteanalyseinstrumentefurdassozialundgesundheitswesen
AT wohlertclaudia gefahrdungsbeurteilungpsychischerbelastunggeeigneteanalyseinstrumentefurdassozialundgesundheitswesen
AT stamersusanne gefahrdungsbeurteilungpsychischerbelastunggeeigneteanalyseinstrumentefurdassozialundgesundheitswesen
AT gregersensabine gefahrdungsbeurteilungpsychischerbelastunggeeigneteanalyseinstrumentefurdassozialundgesundheitswesen