Cargando…
Teletherapie nach Cochleaimplantation in der COVID-19-Pandemie
BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, digitalization in healthcare grew rapidly. Auditory training after cochlear implantation usually takes place face-to-face but social distancing interferes with this therapeutic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In follow-up treatment, 42 adult cochlear implan...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Medizin
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-021-01124-y |
_version_ | 1784605192206942208 |
---|---|
author | Völter, Christiane Stöckmann, Carolin Klein, Hannah Dazert, Stefan Thomas, Jan Peter |
author_facet | Völter, Christiane Stöckmann, Carolin Klein, Hannah Dazert, Stefan Thomas, Jan Peter |
author_sort | Völter, Christiane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, digitalization in healthcare grew rapidly. Auditory training after cochlear implantation usually takes place face-to-face but social distancing interferes with this therapeutic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In follow-up treatment, 42 adult cochlear implant (CI) users aged 53.8 (±15.6) years received video therapy 1 x/week for 5 weeks on a certified platform. After each therapy session, the technical process and therapeutic content were assessed. At the end of the study, usability and the relationship between therapist and patient were evaluated by patients and therapists using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a final questionnaire and by the Skala Therapeutische Allianz – Revised (STA-R). Furthermore, a cost–benefit analysis was done. RESULTS: Usability for both users was high (87.97 versus 93.0). Despite the lack of personal contact, therapeutic alliance was highly appreciated by patients and therapists (87.8% versus 84.8%). The main advantages for the patients were reductions in time and costs. In contrast, the rehabilitation center faced higher costs initially due to the longer time therapists needed to prepare the lessons. Technical problems had to be solved in > 75% of the first sessions but did not bother training thereafter. In total, 47.6% of the patients believe that teletherapy can completely fulfill their therapeutic needs. CONCLUSION: Video therapy has been judged as a useful tool by all users and the majority wants to continue. However, it remains questionable whether the therapist–patient relationship can be sufficiently maintained over a longer period and whether online therapy is as effective as face-to-face therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8620318 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Medizin |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86203182021-11-26 Teletherapie nach Cochleaimplantation in der COVID-19-Pandemie Völter, Christiane Stöckmann, Carolin Klein, Hannah Dazert, Stefan Thomas, Jan Peter HNO Originalien BACKGROUND: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, digitalization in healthcare grew rapidly. Auditory training after cochlear implantation usually takes place face-to-face but social distancing interferes with this therapeutic approach. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In follow-up treatment, 42 adult cochlear implant (CI) users aged 53.8 (±15.6) years received video therapy 1 x/week for 5 weeks on a certified platform. After each therapy session, the technical process and therapeutic content were assessed. At the end of the study, usability and the relationship between therapist and patient were evaluated by patients and therapists using the System Usability Scale (SUS), a final questionnaire and by the Skala Therapeutische Allianz – Revised (STA-R). Furthermore, a cost–benefit analysis was done. RESULTS: Usability for both users was high (87.97 versus 93.0). Despite the lack of personal contact, therapeutic alliance was highly appreciated by patients and therapists (87.8% versus 84.8%). The main advantages for the patients were reductions in time and costs. In contrast, the rehabilitation center faced higher costs initially due to the longer time therapists needed to prepare the lessons. Technical problems had to be solved in > 75% of the first sessions but did not bother training thereafter. In total, 47.6% of the patients believe that teletherapy can completely fulfill their therapeutic needs. CONCLUSION: Video therapy has been judged as a useful tool by all users and the majority wants to continue. However, it remains questionable whether the therapist–patient relationship can be sufficiently maintained over a longer period and whether online therapy is as effective as face-to-face therapy. Springer Medizin 2021-11-26 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC8620318/ /pubmed/34825919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-021-01124-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access Dieser Artikel wird unter der Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International Lizenz veröffentlicht, welche die Nutzung, Vervielfältigung, Bearbeitung, Verbreitung und Wiedergabe in jeglichem Medium und Format erlaubt, sofern Sie den/die ursprünglichen Autor(en) und die Quelle ordnungsgemäß nennen, einen Link zur Creative Commons Lizenz beifügen und angeben, ob Änderungen vorgenommen wurden. Die in diesem Artikel enthaltenen Bilder und sonstiges Drittmaterial unterliegen ebenfalls der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz, sofern sich aus der Abbildungslegende nichts anderes ergibt. Sofern das betreffende Material nicht unter der genannten Creative Commons Lizenz steht und die betreffende Handlung nicht nach gesetzlichen Vorschriften erlaubt ist, ist für die oben aufgeführten Weiterverwendungen des Materials die Einwilligung des jeweiligen Rechteinhabers einzuholen. Weitere Details zur Lizenz entnehmen Sie bitte der Lizenzinformation auf http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.de (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Originalien Völter, Christiane Stöckmann, Carolin Klein, Hannah Dazert, Stefan Thomas, Jan Peter Teletherapie nach Cochleaimplantation in der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title | Teletherapie nach Cochleaimplantation in der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_full | Teletherapie nach Cochleaimplantation in der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_fullStr | Teletherapie nach Cochleaimplantation in der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_full_unstemmed | Teletherapie nach Cochleaimplantation in der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_short | Teletherapie nach Cochleaimplantation in der COVID-19-Pandemie |
title_sort | teletherapie nach cochleaimplantation in der covid-19-pandemie |
topic | Originalien |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620318/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34825919 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00106-021-01124-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT volterchristiane teletherapienachcochleaimplantationindercovid19pandemie AT stockmanncarolin teletherapienachcochleaimplantationindercovid19pandemie AT kleinhannah teletherapienachcochleaimplantationindercovid19pandemie AT dazertstefan teletherapienachcochleaimplantationindercovid19pandemie AT thomasjanpeter teletherapienachcochleaimplantationindercovid19pandemie |