Cargando…

Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

BACKGROUND: Whereas there are many pharmacological interventions prescribed for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparative data between novel generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain scant. Here, we indirectly co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Hao-chuan, Liu, Yi-hong, Ding, Kai-lin, Liu, Yu-feng, Zhao, Wen-jie, Zhu, Yan-juan, Chang, Xue-song, Chen, Ya-dong, Xiao, Zhen-zhen, Yu, Ya-ya, Zhou, Rui, Zhang, Hai-bo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08977-0
_version_ 1784605241058000896
author Ma, Hao-chuan
Liu, Yi-hong
Ding, Kai-lin
Liu, Yu-feng
Zhao, Wen-jie
Zhu, Yan-juan
Chang, Xue-song
Chen, Ya-dong
Xiao, Zhen-zhen
Yu, Ya-ya
Zhou, Rui
Zhang, Hai-bo
author_facet Ma, Hao-chuan
Liu, Yi-hong
Ding, Kai-lin
Liu, Yu-feng
Zhao, Wen-jie
Zhu, Yan-juan
Chang, Xue-song
Chen, Ya-dong
Xiao, Zhen-zhen
Yu, Ya-ya
Zhou, Rui
Zhang, Hai-bo
author_sort Ma, Hao-chuan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Whereas there are many pharmacological interventions prescribed for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparative data between novel generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain scant. Here, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapeutic options used for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. METHODS: We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two or three treatment options. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), or adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to central nervous system (CNS) metastases. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCTs consisting of 2484 patients with 8 treatment options were included in the systematic review. Our analysis showed that alectinib (300 mg and 600 mg), brigatinib, lorlatinib and ensartinib yielded the most favorable PFS. Whereas there was no significant OS or ORR difference among the ALK-TKIs. According to Bayesian ranking profiles, lorlatinib, alectinib 600 mg and alectinib 300 mg had the best PFS (63.7%), OS (35.9%) and ORR (37%), respectively. On the other hand, ceritinib showed the highest rate of severe adverse events (60%). CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicated that alectinib and lorlatinib might be associated with the best therapeutic efficacy in first-line treatment for major population of advanced NSCLC patients with ALK-rearrangement. However, since there is little comparative evidence on the treatment options, there is need for relative trials to fully determine the best treatment options as well as the rapidly evolving treatment landscape. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08977-0.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8620528
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86205282021-11-29 Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials Ma, Hao-chuan Liu, Yi-hong Ding, Kai-lin Liu, Yu-feng Zhao, Wen-jie Zhu, Yan-juan Chang, Xue-song Chen, Ya-dong Xiao, Zhen-zhen Yu, Ya-ya Zhou, Rui Zhang, Hai-bo BMC Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Whereas there are many pharmacological interventions prescribed for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)- rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), comparative data between novel generation ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain scant. Here, we indirectly compared the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapeutic options used for the treatment of ALK-rearranged NSCLC. METHODS: We included all phase 2 and 3 randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing any two or three treatment options. Eligible studies reported at least one of the following outcomes: progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), or adverse events of grade 3 or higher (Grade ≥ 3 AEs). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to central nervous system (CNS) metastases. RESULTS: A total of 9 RCTs consisting of 2484 patients with 8 treatment options were included in the systematic review. Our analysis showed that alectinib (300 mg and 600 mg), brigatinib, lorlatinib and ensartinib yielded the most favorable PFS. Whereas there was no significant OS or ORR difference among the ALK-TKIs. According to Bayesian ranking profiles, lorlatinib, alectinib 600 mg and alectinib 300 mg had the best PFS (63.7%), OS (35.9%) and ORR (37%), respectively. On the other hand, ceritinib showed the highest rate of severe adverse events (60%). CONCLUSION: Our analysis indicated that alectinib and lorlatinib might be associated with the best therapeutic efficacy in first-line treatment for major population of advanced NSCLC patients with ALK-rearrangement. However, since there is little comparative evidence on the treatment options, there is need for relative trials to fully determine the best treatment options as well as the rapidly evolving treatment landscape. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-021-08977-0. BioMed Central 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8620528/ /pubmed/34836510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08977-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ma, Hao-chuan
Liu, Yi-hong
Ding, Kai-lin
Liu, Yu-feng
Zhao, Wen-jie
Zhu, Yan-juan
Chang, Xue-song
Chen, Ya-dong
Xiao, Zhen-zhen
Yu, Ya-ya
Zhou, Rui
Zhang, Hai-bo
Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
title Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_full Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_fullStr Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_short Comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with ALK-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
title_sort comparative efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer with alk-rearranged: a meta-analysis of clinical trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620528/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-021-08977-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mahaochuan comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT liuyihong comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT dingkailin comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT liuyufeng comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT zhaowenjie comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT zhuyanjuan comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT changxuesong comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT chenyadong comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT xiaozhenzhen comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT yuyaya comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT zhourui comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials
AT zhanghaibo comparativeefficacyandsafetyoffirstlinetreatmentsforadvancednonsmallcelllungcancerwithalkrearrangedametaanalysisofclinicaltrials