Cargando…

Multistage Tool Path Optimisation of Single-Point Incremental Forming Process

Single-point incremental forming (SPIF) is a flexible technology that can form a wide range of sheet metal products without the need for using punch and die sets. As a relatively cheap and die-less process, this technology is preferable for small and medium customised production. However, the SPIF t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yan, Zhou, Hassanin, Hany, El-Sayed, Mahmoud Ahmed, Eldessouky, Hossam Mohamed, Djuansjah, JRP, A. Alsaleh, Naser, Essa, Khamis, Ahmadein, Mahmoud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34832197
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14226794
_version_ 1784605300225998848
author Yan, Zhou
Hassanin, Hany
El-Sayed, Mahmoud Ahmed
Eldessouky, Hossam Mohamed
Djuansjah, JRP
A. Alsaleh, Naser
Essa, Khamis
Ahmadein, Mahmoud
author_facet Yan, Zhou
Hassanin, Hany
El-Sayed, Mahmoud Ahmed
Eldessouky, Hossam Mohamed
Djuansjah, JRP
A. Alsaleh, Naser
Essa, Khamis
Ahmadein, Mahmoud
author_sort Yan, Zhou
collection PubMed
description Single-point incremental forming (SPIF) is a flexible technology that can form a wide range of sheet metal products without the need for using punch and die sets. As a relatively cheap and die-less process, this technology is preferable for small and medium customised production. However, the SPIF technology has drawbacks, such as the geometrical inaccuracy and the thickness uniformity of the shaped part. This research aims to optimise the formed part geometric accuracy and reduce the processing time of a two-stage forming strategy of SPIF. Finite element analysis (FEA) was initially used and validated using experimental literature data. Furthermore, the design of experiments (DoE) statistical approach was used to optimise the proposed two-stage SPIF technique. The mass scaling technique was applied during the finite element analysis to minimise the computational time. The results showed that the step size during forming stage two significantly affected the geometrical accuracy of the part, whereas the forming depth during stage one was insignificant to the part quality. It was also revealed that the geometrical improvement had taken place along the base and the wall regions. However, the areas near the clamp system showed minor improvements. The optimised two-stage strategy successfully decreased both the geometrical inaccuracy and processing time. After optimisation, the average values of the geometrical deviation and forming time were reduced by 25% and 55.56%, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8620775
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86207752021-11-27 Multistage Tool Path Optimisation of Single-Point Incremental Forming Process Yan, Zhou Hassanin, Hany El-Sayed, Mahmoud Ahmed Eldessouky, Hossam Mohamed Djuansjah, JRP A. Alsaleh, Naser Essa, Khamis Ahmadein, Mahmoud Materials (Basel) Article Single-point incremental forming (SPIF) is a flexible technology that can form a wide range of sheet metal products without the need for using punch and die sets. As a relatively cheap and die-less process, this technology is preferable for small and medium customised production. However, the SPIF technology has drawbacks, such as the geometrical inaccuracy and the thickness uniformity of the shaped part. This research aims to optimise the formed part geometric accuracy and reduce the processing time of a two-stage forming strategy of SPIF. Finite element analysis (FEA) was initially used and validated using experimental literature data. Furthermore, the design of experiments (DoE) statistical approach was used to optimise the proposed two-stage SPIF technique. The mass scaling technique was applied during the finite element analysis to minimise the computational time. The results showed that the step size during forming stage two significantly affected the geometrical accuracy of the part, whereas the forming depth during stage one was insignificant to the part quality. It was also revealed that the geometrical improvement had taken place along the base and the wall regions. However, the areas near the clamp system showed minor improvements. The optimised two-stage strategy successfully decreased both the geometrical inaccuracy and processing time. After optimisation, the average values of the geometrical deviation and forming time were reduced by 25% and 55.56%, respectively. MDPI 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8620775/ /pubmed/34832197 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14226794 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yan, Zhou
Hassanin, Hany
El-Sayed, Mahmoud Ahmed
Eldessouky, Hossam Mohamed
Djuansjah, JRP
A. Alsaleh, Naser
Essa, Khamis
Ahmadein, Mahmoud
Multistage Tool Path Optimisation of Single-Point Incremental Forming Process
title Multistage Tool Path Optimisation of Single-Point Incremental Forming Process
title_full Multistage Tool Path Optimisation of Single-Point Incremental Forming Process
title_fullStr Multistage Tool Path Optimisation of Single-Point Incremental Forming Process
title_full_unstemmed Multistage Tool Path Optimisation of Single-Point Incremental Forming Process
title_short Multistage Tool Path Optimisation of Single-Point Incremental Forming Process
title_sort multistage tool path optimisation of single-point incremental forming process
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620775/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34832197
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14226794
work_keys_str_mv AT yanzhou multistagetoolpathoptimisationofsinglepointincrementalformingprocess
AT hassaninhany multistagetoolpathoptimisationofsinglepointincrementalformingprocess
AT elsayedmahmoudahmed multistagetoolpathoptimisationofsinglepointincrementalformingprocess
AT eldessoukyhossammohamed multistagetoolpathoptimisationofsinglepointincrementalformingprocess
AT djuansjahjrp multistagetoolpathoptimisationofsinglepointincrementalformingprocess
AT aalsalehnaser multistagetoolpathoptimisationofsinglepointincrementalformingprocess
AT essakhamis multistagetoolpathoptimisationofsinglepointincrementalformingprocess
AT ahmadeinmahmoud multistagetoolpathoptimisationofsinglepointincrementalformingprocess