Cargando…

Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Computed tomography (CT) scans are useful for confirming head injury diagnoses. However, there is no standard clinical decision rule (CDR) for determining the need for CT scanning in pediatric patients with head injuries. We developed a CDR and conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate its...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yogo, Naoki, Toida, Chiaki, Muguruma, Takashi, Gakumazawa, Masayasu, Shinohara, Mafumi, Takeuchi, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830529
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225248
_version_ 1784605303214440448
author Yogo, Naoki
Toida, Chiaki
Muguruma, Takashi
Gakumazawa, Masayasu
Shinohara, Mafumi
Takeuchi, Ichiro
author_facet Yogo, Naoki
Toida, Chiaki
Muguruma, Takashi
Gakumazawa, Masayasu
Shinohara, Mafumi
Takeuchi, Ichiro
author_sort Yogo, Naoki
collection PubMed
description Computed tomography (CT) scans are useful for confirming head injury diagnoses. However, there is no standard clinical decision rule (CDR) for determining the need for CT scanning in pediatric patients with head injuries. We developed a CDR and conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy in identifying children with clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI). We selected predictors based on three existing CDRs: CATCH, CHALICE, and PECARN. Of the 2569 eligible patients, 645 (439 (68%) boys, median age: five years) were included in this study. In total, 59 (9%) patients showed ciTBI, and 129 (20%) were admitted to hospital. The novel CDR comprised six predictors of abnormal CT findings. It had a sensitivity of 79.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 65.5–89.0%) and a specificity of 50.9% (95% CI: 48.9–52.3%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (0.72, 95% CI: 0.67–0.77) was non-inferior to those of CATCH, CHALICE, and PECARN (0.71, 95% CI: 0.66–0.77; 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61–0.74; and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64–0.73, respectively; p = 0.57). The novel CDR was statistically noninferior in diagnostic accuracy compared to the three existing CDRs. Further development and validation studies are needed before clinical application.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8620787
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86207872021-11-27 Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study Yogo, Naoki Toida, Chiaki Muguruma, Takashi Gakumazawa, Masayasu Shinohara, Mafumi Takeuchi, Ichiro J Clin Med Article Computed tomography (CT) scans are useful for confirming head injury diagnoses. However, there is no standard clinical decision rule (CDR) for determining the need for CT scanning in pediatric patients with head injuries. We developed a CDR and conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy in identifying children with clinically important traumatic brain injury (ciTBI). We selected predictors based on three existing CDRs: CATCH, CHALICE, and PECARN. Of the 2569 eligible patients, 645 (439 (68%) boys, median age: five years) were included in this study. In total, 59 (9%) patients showed ciTBI, and 129 (20%) were admitted to hospital. The novel CDR comprised six predictors of abnormal CT findings. It had a sensitivity of 79.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 65.5–89.0%) and a specificity of 50.9% (95% CI: 48.9–52.3%). The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (0.72, 95% CI: 0.67–0.77) was non-inferior to those of CATCH, CHALICE, and PECARN (0.71, 95% CI: 0.66–0.77; 0.67, 95% CI: 0.61–0.74; and 0.69, 95% CI: 0.64–0.73, respectively; p = 0.57). The novel CDR was statistically noninferior in diagnostic accuracy compared to the three existing CDRs. Further development and validation studies are needed before clinical application. MDPI 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8620787/ /pubmed/34830529 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225248 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Yogo, Naoki
Toida, Chiaki
Muguruma, Takashi
Gakumazawa, Masayasu
Shinohara, Mafumi
Takeuchi, Ichiro
Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_fullStr Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_full_unstemmed Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_short Simplified Clinical Decision Rule Using Clinically Important Events for Risk Prediction in Pediatric Head Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study
title_sort simplified clinical decision rule using clinically important events for risk prediction in pediatric head injury: a retrospective cohort study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620787/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830529
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225248
work_keys_str_mv AT yogonaoki simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT toidachiaki simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT mugurumatakashi simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT gakumazawamasayasu simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT shinoharamafumi simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT takeuchiichiro simplifiedclinicaldecisionruleusingclinicallyimportanteventsforriskpredictioninpediatricheadinjuryaretrospectivecohortstudy