Cargando…
A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure
BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) has been standard of care in treating renal anaemia for the past 20 years. Many patients have limited access to ESA in view of long-term costs leading to suboptimal ESA dosage. Biosimilar epoetin is a potential cost-effective alternative to originat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w |
_version_ | 1784605344005095424 |
---|---|
author | Lim, Soo Kun Goh, Bak Leong Visvanathan, Ravindran Kim, Su Hyun Jeon, Jin Seok Kim, Sung Gyun Chang, Jae Hyun Lim, Chun Soo Morad, Zaki |
author_facet | Lim, Soo Kun Goh, Bak Leong Visvanathan, Ravindran Kim, Su Hyun Jeon, Jin Seok Kim, Sung Gyun Chang, Jae Hyun Lim, Chun Soo Morad, Zaki |
author_sort | Lim, Soo Kun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) has been standard of care in treating renal anaemia for the past 20 years. Many patients have limited access to ESA in view of long-term costs leading to suboptimal ESA dosage. Biosimilar epoetin is a potential cost-effective alternative to originator for optimal renal anaemia management. OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of PDA10 in treating renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients, in comparison to the originator epoetin-α, Eprex®. METHODS: A phase 3, multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled and parallel group study conducted over 40 weeks in Malaysia and Korea. End stage kidney disease patients undergoing regular haemodialysis who were on erythropoietin treatment were recruited. The study has 3 phases, which included a 12-week titration phase, followed by 28-week double-blind treatment phase and 24-week open-label extension phase. RESULTS: The PDA10 and Eprex® were shown to be therapeutically equivalent (p < 0.0001) with mean absolute change in haemoglobin from baseline of − 0.176 (± 0.91) g/dl and − 0.118 (± 1.114) g/dl, respectively. Weekly dose change was 10.01 IU/kg/week in PDA10 group and 10.30 IU/kg/week in Eprex® group, which has no significant difference. There were no significant differences in the safety profile between PDA10 and Eprex® groups. CONCLUSION: This study has confirmed the therapeutic equivalence between PDA10 and Eprex® in terms of efficacy, dosage requirement and safety profile in haemodialysis patients with renal anaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the National Medical Research Register (NMRR-13-400-16313). This study has been registered retrospectively with Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea on 25 March 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8620966 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86209662021-11-29 A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure Lim, Soo Kun Goh, Bak Leong Visvanathan, Ravindran Kim, Su Hyun Jeon, Jin Seok Kim, Sung Gyun Chang, Jae Hyun Lim, Chun Soo Morad, Zaki BMC Nephrol Research BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) has been standard of care in treating renal anaemia for the past 20 years. Many patients have limited access to ESA in view of long-term costs leading to suboptimal ESA dosage. Biosimilar epoetin is a potential cost-effective alternative to originator for optimal renal anaemia management. OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of PDA10 in treating renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients, in comparison to the originator epoetin-α, Eprex®. METHODS: A phase 3, multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled and parallel group study conducted over 40 weeks in Malaysia and Korea. End stage kidney disease patients undergoing regular haemodialysis who were on erythropoietin treatment were recruited. The study has 3 phases, which included a 12-week titration phase, followed by 28-week double-blind treatment phase and 24-week open-label extension phase. RESULTS: The PDA10 and Eprex® were shown to be therapeutically equivalent (p < 0.0001) with mean absolute change in haemoglobin from baseline of − 0.176 (± 0.91) g/dl and − 0.118 (± 1.114) g/dl, respectively. Weekly dose change was 10.01 IU/kg/week in PDA10 group and 10.30 IU/kg/week in Eprex® group, which has no significant difference. There were no significant differences in the safety profile between PDA10 and Eprex® groups. CONCLUSION: This study has confirmed the therapeutic equivalence between PDA10 and Eprex® in terms of efficacy, dosage requirement and safety profile in haemodialysis patients with renal anaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the National Medical Research Register (NMRR-13-400-16313). This study has been registered retrospectively with Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea on 25 March 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w. BioMed Central 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8620966/ /pubmed/34823497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Lim, Soo Kun Goh, Bak Leong Visvanathan, Ravindran Kim, Su Hyun Jeon, Jin Seok Kim, Sung Gyun Chang, Jae Hyun Lim, Chun Soo Morad, Zaki A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure |
title | A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure |
title_full | A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure |
title_fullStr | A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure |
title_full_unstemmed | A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure |
title_short | A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure |
title_sort | multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of pda10 (epoetin-alfa) vs. eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620966/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT limsookun amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT gohbakleong amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT visvanathanravindran amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT kimsuhyun amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT jeonjinseok amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT kimsunggyun amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT changjaehyun amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT limchunsoo amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT moradzaki amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT limsookun multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT gohbakleong multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT visvanathanravindran multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT kimsuhyun multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT jeonjinseok multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT kimsunggyun multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT changjaehyun multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT limchunsoo multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure AT moradzaki multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure |