Cargando…

A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure

BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) has been standard of care in treating renal anaemia for the past 20 years. Many patients have limited access to ESA in view of long-term costs leading to suboptimal ESA dosage. Biosimilar epoetin is a potential cost-effective alternative to originat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lim, Soo Kun, Goh, Bak Leong, Visvanathan, Ravindran, Kim, Su Hyun, Jeon, Jin Seok, Kim, Sung Gyun, Chang, Jae Hyun, Lim, Chun Soo, Morad, Zaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w
_version_ 1784605344005095424
author Lim, Soo Kun
Goh, Bak Leong
Visvanathan, Ravindran
Kim, Su Hyun
Jeon, Jin Seok
Kim, Sung Gyun
Chang, Jae Hyun
Lim, Chun Soo
Morad, Zaki
author_facet Lim, Soo Kun
Goh, Bak Leong
Visvanathan, Ravindran
Kim, Su Hyun
Jeon, Jin Seok
Kim, Sung Gyun
Chang, Jae Hyun
Lim, Chun Soo
Morad, Zaki
author_sort Lim, Soo Kun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) has been standard of care in treating renal anaemia for the past 20 years. Many patients have limited access to ESA in view of long-term costs leading to suboptimal ESA dosage. Biosimilar epoetin is a potential cost-effective alternative to originator for optimal renal anaemia management. OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of PDA10 in treating renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients, in comparison to the originator epoetin-α, Eprex®. METHODS: A phase 3, multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled and parallel group study conducted over 40 weeks in Malaysia and Korea. End stage kidney disease patients undergoing regular haemodialysis who were on erythropoietin treatment were recruited. The study has 3 phases, which included a 12-week titration phase, followed by 28-week double-blind treatment phase and 24-week open-label extension phase. RESULTS: The PDA10 and Eprex® were shown to be therapeutically equivalent (p < 0.0001) with mean absolute change in haemoglobin from baseline of − 0.176 (± 0.91) g/dl and − 0.118 (± 1.114) g/dl, respectively. Weekly dose change was 10.01 IU/kg/week in PDA10 group and 10.30 IU/kg/week in Eprex® group, which has no significant difference. There were no significant differences in the safety profile between PDA10 and Eprex® groups. CONCLUSION: This study has confirmed the therapeutic equivalence between PDA10 and Eprex® in terms of efficacy, dosage requirement and safety profile in haemodialysis patients with renal anaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the National Medical Research Register (NMRR-13-400-16313). This study has been registered retrospectively with Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea on 25 March 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8620966
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86209662021-11-29 A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure Lim, Soo Kun Goh, Bak Leong Visvanathan, Ravindran Kim, Su Hyun Jeon, Jin Seok Kim, Sung Gyun Chang, Jae Hyun Lim, Chun Soo Morad, Zaki BMC Nephrol Research BACKGROUND: Erythropoietin stimulating agent (ESA) has been standard of care in treating renal anaemia for the past 20 years. Many patients have limited access to ESA in view of long-term costs leading to suboptimal ESA dosage. Biosimilar epoetin is a potential cost-effective alternative to originator for optimal renal anaemia management. OBJECTIVE: To determine efficacy and safety of PDA10 in treating renal anaemia in haemodialysis patients, in comparison to the originator epoetin-α, Eprex®. METHODS: A phase 3, multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled and parallel group study conducted over 40 weeks in Malaysia and Korea. End stage kidney disease patients undergoing regular haemodialysis who were on erythropoietin treatment were recruited. The study has 3 phases, which included a 12-week titration phase, followed by 28-week double-blind treatment phase and 24-week open-label extension phase. RESULTS: The PDA10 and Eprex® were shown to be therapeutically equivalent (p < 0.0001) with mean absolute change in haemoglobin from baseline of − 0.176 (± 0.91) g/dl and − 0.118 (± 1.114) g/dl, respectively. Weekly dose change was 10.01 IU/kg/week in PDA10 group and 10.30 IU/kg/week in Eprex® group, which has no significant difference. There were no significant differences in the safety profile between PDA10 and Eprex® groups. CONCLUSION: This study has confirmed the therapeutic equivalence between PDA10 and Eprex® in terms of efficacy, dosage requirement and safety profile in haemodialysis patients with renal anaemia. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered with the National Medical Research Register (NMRR-13-400-16313). This study has been registered retrospectively with Clinical Research Information Service (CRiS), Republic of Korea on 25 March 2021. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w. BioMed Central 2021-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8620966/ /pubmed/34823497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w Text en © The Author(s) 2021, corrected publication 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lim, Soo Kun
Goh, Bak Leong
Visvanathan, Ravindran
Kim, Su Hyun
Jeon, Jin Seok
Kim, Sung Gyun
Chang, Jae Hyun
Lim, Chun Soo
Morad, Zaki
A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure
title A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure
title_full A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure
title_fullStr A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure
title_full_unstemmed A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure
title_short A multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of PDA10 (Epoetin-Alfa) vs. Eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure
title_sort multicentre, multi-national, double-blind, randomised, active-controlled, parallel-group clinical study to assess the safety and efficacy of pda10 (epoetin-alfa) vs. eprex® in patients with anaemia of chronic renal failure
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620966/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34823497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12882-021-02601-w
work_keys_str_mv AT limsookun amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT gohbakleong amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT visvanathanravindran amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT kimsuhyun amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT jeonjinseok amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT kimsunggyun amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT changjaehyun amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT limchunsoo amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT moradzaki amulticentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT limsookun multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT gohbakleong multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT visvanathanravindran multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT kimsuhyun multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT jeonjinseok multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT kimsunggyun multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT changjaehyun multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT limchunsoo multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure
AT moradzaki multicentremultinationaldoubleblindrandomisedactivecontrolledparallelgroupclinicalstudytoassessthesafetyandefficacyofpda10epoetinalfavseprexinpatientswithanaemiaofchronicrenalfailure