Cargando…

Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method

Background: We investigated and compared the osteogenic potential and bone regeneration capacities of dedifferentiated fat cells (DFAT cells) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). Method: We isolated DFAT cells and ASCs from GFP mice. DFAT cells were established by a new culture method using a mesh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Takabatake, Kiyofumi, Matsubara, Masakazu, Yamachika, Eiki, Fujita, Yuki, Arimura, Yuki, Nakatsuji, Kazuki, Nakano, Keisuke, Nagatsuka, Histoshi, Iida, Seiji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212392
_version_ 1784605344751681536
author Takabatake, Kiyofumi
Matsubara, Masakazu
Yamachika, Eiki
Fujita, Yuki
Arimura, Yuki
Nakatsuji, Kazuki
Nakano, Keisuke
Nagatsuka, Histoshi
Iida, Seiji
author_facet Takabatake, Kiyofumi
Matsubara, Masakazu
Yamachika, Eiki
Fujita, Yuki
Arimura, Yuki
Nakatsuji, Kazuki
Nakano, Keisuke
Nagatsuka, Histoshi
Iida, Seiji
author_sort Takabatake, Kiyofumi
collection PubMed
description Background: We investigated and compared the osteogenic potential and bone regeneration capacities of dedifferentiated fat cells (DFAT cells) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). Method: We isolated DFAT cells and ASCs from GFP mice. DFAT cells were established by a new culture method using a mesh culture instead of a ceiling culture. The isolated DFAT cells and ASCs were incubated in osteogenic medium, then alizarin red staining, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays, and RT-PCR (for RUNX2, osteopontin, DLX5, osterix, and osteocalcin) were performed to evaluate the osteoblastic differentiation ability of both cell types in vitro. In vivo, the DFAT cells and ASCs were incubated in osteogenic medium for four weeks and seeded on collagen composite scaffolds, then implanted subcutaneously into the backs of mice. We then performed hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunostaining for GFP and osteocalcin. Results: The alizarin red-stained areas in DFAT cells showed weak calcification ability at two weeks, but high calcification ability at three weeks, similar to ASCs. The ALP levels of ASCs increased earlier than in DFAT cells and showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) at 6 and 9 days. The ALP levels of DFATs were higher than those of ASCs after 12 days. The expression levels of osteoblast marker genes (osterix and osteocalcin) of DFAT cells and ASCs were higher after osteogenic differentiation culture. Conclusion: DFAT cells are easily isolated from a small amount of adipose tissue and are readily expanded with high purity; thus, DFAT cells are applicable to many tissue-engineering strategies and cell-based therapies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8620969
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86209692021-11-27 Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method Takabatake, Kiyofumi Matsubara, Masakazu Yamachika, Eiki Fujita, Yuki Arimura, Yuki Nakatsuji, Kazuki Nakano, Keisuke Nagatsuka, Histoshi Iida, Seiji Int J Mol Sci Article Background: We investigated and compared the osteogenic potential and bone regeneration capacities of dedifferentiated fat cells (DFAT cells) and adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs). Method: We isolated DFAT cells and ASCs from GFP mice. DFAT cells were established by a new culture method using a mesh culture instead of a ceiling culture. The isolated DFAT cells and ASCs were incubated in osteogenic medium, then alizarin red staining, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) assays, and RT-PCR (for RUNX2, osteopontin, DLX5, osterix, and osteocalcin) were performed to evaluate the osteoblastic differentiation ability of both cell types in vitro. In vivo, the DFAT cells and ASCs were incubated in osteogenic medium for four weeks and seeded on collagen composite scaffolds, then implanted subcutaneously into the backs of mice. We then performed hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunostaining for GFP and osteocalcin. Results: The alizarin red-stained areas in DFAT cells showed weak calcification ability at two weeks, but high calcification ability at three weeks, similar to ASCs. The ALP levels of ASCs increased earlier than in DFAT cells and showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) at 6 and 9 days. The ALP levels of DFATs were higher than those of ASCs after 12 days. The expression levels of osteoblast marker genes (osterix and osteocalcin) of DFAT cells and ASCs were higher after osteogenic differentiation culture. Conclusion: DFAT cells are easily isolated from a small amount of adipose tissue and are readily expanded with high purity; thus, DFAT cells are applicable to many tissue-engineering strategies and cell-based therapies. MDPI 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8620969/ /pubmed/34830277 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212392 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Takabatake, Kiyofumi
Matsubara, Masakazu
Yamachika, Eiki
Fujita, Yuki
Arimura, Yuki
Nakatsuji, Kazuki
Nakano, Keisuke
Nagatsuka, Histoshi
Iida, Seiji
Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method
title Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method
title_full Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method
title_fullStr Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method
title_short Comparing the Osteogenic Potential and Bone Regeneration Capacities of Dedifferentiated Fat Cells and Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo: Application of DFAT Cells Isolated by a Mesh Method
title_sort comparing the osteogenic potential and bone regeneration capacities of dedifferentiated fat cells and adipose-derived stem cells in vitro and in vivo: application of dfat cells isolated by a mesh method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8620969/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830277
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms222212392
work_keys_str_mv AT takabatakekiyofumi comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod
AT matsubaramasakazu comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod
AT yamachikaeiki comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod
AT fujitayuki comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod
AT arimurayuki comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod
AT nakatsujikazuki comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod
AT nakanokeisuke comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod
AT nagatsukahistoshi comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod
AT iidaseiji comparingtheosteogenicpotentialandboneregenerationcapacitiesofdedifferentiatedfatcellsandadiposederivedstemcellsinvitroandinvivoapplicationofdfatcellsisolatedbyameshmethod