Cargando…

The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology

Most smart meters are connected and powered by the electric mains, requiring the service interruption and qualified personnel for their installation. Wireless technologies and energy harvesting techniques have been proved as alternatives for communications and power supply, respectively. In this wor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Saavedra, Edgar, Mascaraque, Laura, Calderon, Gonzalo, del Campo, Guillermo, Santamaria, Asuncion
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227433
_version_ 1784605410125152256
author Saavedra, Edgar
Mascaraque, Laura
Calderon, Gonzalo
del Campo, Guillermo
Santamaria, Asuncion
author_facet Saavedra, Edgar
Mascaraque, Laura
Calderon, Gonzalo
del Campo, Guillermo
Santamaria, Asuncion
author_sort Saavedra, Edgar
collection PubMed
description Most smart meters are connected and powered by the electric mains, requiring the service interruption and qualified personnel for their installation. Wireless technologies and energy harvesting techniques have been proved as alternatives for communications and power supply, respectively. In this work, we analyse the energy consumption of the most used IoT wireless technologies nowadays: Sigfox, LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, Wi-Fi, BLE. Smart meters’ energy consumption accounts for metering, standby and communication processes. Experimental measurements show that communication consumption may vary upon the specific characteristics of each wireless communication technology—payload, connection establishment, transmission time. Results show that the selection of a specific technology will depend on the application requirements (message payload, metering period) and location constraints (communication range, infrastructure availability). Besides, we compare the performance of the most suitable energy harvesting (EH) techniques for smart meters: photovoltaic (PV), radiofrequency (RF) and magnetic induction (MIEH). Thus, EH technique selection will depend on the availability of each source at the smart meter’s location. The most appropriate combination of IoT wireless technology and EH technique must be selected accordingly to the very use case requirements and constraints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8621240
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86212402021-11-27 The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology Saavedra, Edgar Mascaraque, Laura Calderon, Gonzalo del Campo, Guillermo Santamaria, Asuncion Sensors (Basel) Article Most smart meters are connected and powered by the electric mains, requiring the service interruption and qualified personnel for their installation. Wireless technologies and energy harvesting techniques have been proved as alternatives for communications and power supply, respectively. In this work, we analyse the energy consumption of the most used IoT wireless technologies nowadays: Sigfox, LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, Wi-Fi, BLE. Smart meters’ energy consumption accounts for metering, standby and communication processes. Experimental measurements show that communication consumption may vary upon the specific characteristics of each wireless communication technology—payload, connection establishment, transmission time. Results show that the selection of a specific technology will depend on the application requirements (message payload, metering period) and location constraints (communication range, infrastructure availability). Besides, we compare the performance of the most suitable energy harvesting (EH) techniques for smart meters: photovoltaic (PV), radiofrequency (RF) and magnetic induction (MIEH). Thus, EH technique selection will depend on the availability of each source at the smart meter’s location. The most appropriate combination of IoT wireless technology and EH technique must be selected accordingly to the very use case requirements and constraints. MDPI 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8621240/ /pubmed/34833509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227433 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Saavedra, Edgar
Mascaraque, Laura
Calderon, Gonzalo
del Campo, Guillermo
Santamaria, Asuncion
The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology
title The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology
title_full The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology
title_fullStr The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology
title_full_unstemmed The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology
title_short The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology
title_sort smart meter challenge: feasibility of autonomous indoor iot devices depending on its energy harvesting source and iot wireless technology
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833509
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227433
work_keys_str_mv AT saavedraedgar thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT mascaraquelaura thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT calderongonzalo thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT delcampoguillermo thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT santamariaasuncion thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT saavedraedgar smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT mascaraquelaura smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT calderongonzalo smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT delcampoguillermo smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology
AT santamariaasuncion smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology