Cargando…
The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology
Most smart meters are connected and powered by the electric mains, requiring the service interruption and qualified personnel for their installation. Wireless technologies and energy harvesting techniques have been proved as alternatives for communications and power supply, respectively. In this wor...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227433 |
_version_ | 1784605410125152256 |
---|---|
author | Saavedra, Edgar Mascaraque, Laura Calderon, Gonzalo del Campo, Guillermo Santamaria, Asuncion |
author_facet | Saavedra, Edgar Mascaraque, Laura Calderon, Gonzalo del Campo, Guillermo Santamaria, Asuncion |
author_sort | Saavedra, Edgar |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most smart meters are connected and powered by the electric mains, requiring the service interruption and qualified personnel for their installation. Wireless technologies and energy harvesting techniques have been proved as alternatives for communications and power supply, respectively. In this work, we analyse the energy consumption of the most used IoT wireless technologies nowadays: Sigfox, LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, Wi-Fi, BLE. Smart meters’ energy consumption accounts for metering, standby and communication processes. Experimental measurements show that communication consumption may vary upon the specific characteristics of each wireless communication technology—payload, connection establishment, transmission time. Results show that the selection of a specific technology will depend on the application requirements (message payload, metering period) and location constraints (communication range, infrastructure availability). Besides, we compare the performance of the most suitable energy harvesting (EH) techniques for smart meters: photovoltaic (PV), radiofrequency (RF) and magnetic induction (MIEH). Thus, EH technique selection will depend on the availability of each source at the smart meter’s location. The most appropriate combination of IoT wireless technology and EH technique must be selected accordingly to the very use case requirements and constraints. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8621240 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86212402021-11-27 The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology Saavedra, Edgar Mascaraque, Laura Calderon, Gonzalo del Campo, Guillermo Santamaria, Asuncion Sensors (Basel) Article Most smart meters are connected and powered by the electric mains, requiring the service interruption and qualified personnel for their installation. Wireless technologies and energy harvesting techniques have been proved as alternatives for communications and power supply, respectively. In this work, we analyse the energy consumption of the most used IoT wireless technologies nowadays: Sigfox, LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, Wi-Fi, BLE. Smart meters’ energy consumption accounts for metering, standby and communication processes. Experimental measurements show that communication consumption may vary upon the specific characteristics of each wireless communication technology—payload, connection establishment, transmission time. Results show that the selection of a specific technology will depend on the application requirements (message payload, metering period) and location constraints (communication range, infrastructure availability). Besides, we compare the performance of the most suitable energy harvesting (EH) techniques for smart meters: photovoltaic (PV), radiofrequency (RF) and magnetic induction (MIEH). Thus, EH technique selection will depend on the availability of each source at the smart meter’s location. The most appropriate combination of IoT wireless technology and EH technique must be selected accordingly to the very use case requirements and constraints. MDPI 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8621240/ /pubmed/34833509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227433 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Saavedra, Edgar Mascaraque, Laura Calderon, Gonzalo del Campo, Guillermo Santamaria, Asuncion The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology |
title | The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology |
title_full | The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology |
title_fullStr | The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology |
title_full_unstemmed | The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology |
title_short | The Smart Meter Challenge: Feasibility of Autonomous Indoor IoT Devices Depending on Its Energy Harvesting Source and IoT Wireless Technology |
title_sort | smart meter challenge: feasibility of autonomous indoor iot devices depending on its energy harvesting source and iot wireless technology |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621240/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833509 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saavedraedgar thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT mascaraquelaura thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT calderongonzalo thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT delcampoguillermo thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT santamariaasuncion thesmartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT saavedraedgar smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT mascaraquelaura smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT calderongonzalo smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT delcampoguillermo smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology AT santamariaasuncion smartmeterchallengefeasibilityofautonomousindooriotdevicesdependingonitsenergyharvestingsourceandiotwirelesstechnology |