Cargando…
A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice
Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211932 |
_version_ | 1784605424560898048 |
---|---|
author | Teeling, Sean Paul Davies, Carmel Barnard, Marlize O’Connor, Laserina Coffey, Alice Lambert, Veronica McNamara, Martin Tuohy, Dympna Frawley, Timothy Redmond, Catherine Somanadhan, Suja Casey, Mary Corcoran, Yvonne Doody, Owen O’Brien, Denise Noonan, Maria Smith, Rita Bradshaw, Carmel Murphy, Sylvia Dore, Liz Lyons, Rosemary McGeehan, Máire Gallen, Anne |
author_facet | Teeling, Sean Paul Davies, Carmel Barnard, Marlize O’Connor, Laserina Coffey, Alice Lambert, Veronica McNamara, Martin Tuohy, Dympna Frawley, Timothy Redmond, Catherine Somanadhan, Suja Casey, Mary Corcoran, Yvonne Doody, Owen O’Brien, Denise Noonan, Maria Smith, Rita Bradshaw, Carmel Murphy, Sylvia Dore, Liz Lyons, Rosemary McGeehan, Máire Gallen, Anne |
author_sort | Teeling, Sean Paul |
collection | PubMed |
description | Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informed by RAMESES II standards was conducted as an efficient means to synthesize evidence using an expert panel. The review involved research question development, quality appraisal, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Six program theories summarised below identify the key characteristics that promote positive outcomes in QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 1: Focuses on the evidence base and accessibility of the QCP-M and their ease of use by nurses and midwives working in busy and complex care environments. Program Theory 2: Examines the influence of external factors on QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 3: Relates to existing cultures and systems within clinical sites. Program Theory 4: Relates to nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge and beliefs. Program Theory 5: Builds on the staff theme of Programme Theory four, extending the culture of organizational learning, and highlights the meaningful engagement of nurses and midwives in the implementation process as a key characteristic of success. Program Theory 6: Relates to patient needs. The results provide nursing and midwifery policymakers and professionals with evidence-based program theory that can be translated into action-orientated strategies to help guide successful QCP-M implementation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8621300 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86213002021-11-27 A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice Teeling, Sean Paul Davies, Carmel Barnard, Marlize O’Connor, Laserina Coffey, Alice Lambert, Veronica McNamara, Martin Tuohy, Dympna Frawley, Timothy Redmond, Catherine Somanadhan, Suja Casey, Mary Corcoran, Yvonne Doody, Owen O’Brien, Denise Noonan, Maria Smith, Rita Bradshaw, Carmel Murphy, Sylvia Dore, Liz Lyons, Rosemary McGeehan, Máire Gallen, Anne Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Quality measurement initiatives promote quality improvement in healthcare but can be challenging to implement effectively. This paper presents a Rapid Realist Review (RRR) of published literature on Quality Care-Process Metrics (QCP-M) implementation in nursing and midwifery practice. An RRR informed by RAMESES II standards was conducted as an efficient means to synthesize evidence using an expert panel. The review involved research question development, quality appraisal, data extraction, and evidence synthesis. Six program theories summarised below identify the key characteristics that promote positive outcomes in QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 1: Focuses on the evidence base and accessibility of the QCP-M and their ease of use by nurses and midwives working in busy and complex care environments. Program Theory 2: Examines the influence of external factors on QCP-M implementation. Program Theory 3: Relates to existing cultures and systems within clinical sites. Program Theory 4: Relates to nurses’ and midwives’ knowledge and beliefs. Program Theory 5: Builds on the staff theme of Programme Theory four, extending the culture of organizational learning, and highlights the meaningful engagement of nurses and midwives in the implementation process as a key characteristic of success. Program Theory 6: Relates to patient needs. The results provide nursing and midwifery policymakers and professionals with evidence-based program theory that can be translated into action-orientated strategies to help guide successful QCP-M implementation. MDPI 2021-11-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8621300/ /pubmed/34831694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211932 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Teeling, Sean Paul Davies, Carmel Barnard, Marlize O’Connor, Laserina Coffey, Alice Lambert, Veronica McNamara, Martin Tuohy, Dympna Frawley, Timothy Redmond, Catherine Somanadhan, Suja Casey, Mary Corcoran, Yvonne Doody, Owen O’Brien, Denise Noonan, Maria Smith, Rita Bradshaw, Carmel Murphy, Sylvia Dore, Liz Lyons, Rosemary McGeehan, Máire Gallen, Anne A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice |
title | A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice |
title_full | A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice |
title_fullStr | A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice |
title_short | A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice |
title_sort | rapid realist review of quality care process metrics implementation in nursing and midwifery practice |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621300/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831694 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211932 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT teelingseanpaul arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT daviescarmel arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT barnardmarlize arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT oconnorlaserina arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT coffeyalice arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT lambertveronica arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT mcnamaramartin arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT tuohydympna arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT frawleytimothy arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT redmondcatherine arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT somanadhansuja arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT caseymary arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT corcoranyvonne arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT doodyowen arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT obriendenise arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT noonanmaria arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT smithrita arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT bradshawcarmel arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT murphysylvia arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT doreliz arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT lyonsrosemary arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT mcgeehanmaire arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT gallenanne arapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT teelingseanpaul rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT daviescarmel rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT barnardmarlize rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT oconnorlaserina rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT coffeyalice rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT lambertveronica rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT mcnamaramartin rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT tuohydympna rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT frawleytimothy rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT redmondcatherine rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT somanadhansuja rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT caseymary rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT corcoranyvonne rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT doodyowen rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT obriendenise rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT noonanmaria rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT smithrita rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT bradshawcarmel rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT murphysylvia rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT doreliz rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT lyonsrosemary rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT mcgeehanmaire rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice AT gallenanne rapidrealistreviewofqualitycareprocessmetricsimplementationinnursingandmidwiferypractice |