Cargando…

Development of Policy-Relevant Indicators for Injury Prevention in British Columbia by the Key Decision-Makers

Indicators can help decision-makers evaluate interventions in a complex, multi-sectoral injury system. We aimed to create indicators for road safety, seniors falls, and ‘all-injuries’ to inform and evaluate injury prevention initiatives in British Columbia, Canada. The indicator development process...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Oakey, Megan, Evans, David C., Copley, Tobin T., Karbakhsh, Mojgan, Samarakkody, Diana, Brubacher, Jeff R., Pawer, Samantha, Zheng, Alex, Rajabali, Fahra, Fyfe, Murray, Pike, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211837
_version_ 1784605497902497792
author Oakey, Megan
Evans, David C.
Copley, Tobin T.
Karbakhsh, Mojgan
Samarakkody, Diana
Brubacher, Jeff R.
Pawer, Samantha
Zheng, Alex
Rajabali, Fahra
Fyfe, Murray
Pike, Ian
author_facet Oakey, Megan
Evans, David C.
Copley, Tobin T.
Karbakhsh, Mojgan
Samarakkody, Diana
Brubacher, Jeff R.
Pawer, Samantha
Zheng, Alex
Rajabali, Fahra
Fyfe, Murray
Pike, Ian
author_sort Oakey, Megan
collection PubMed
description Indicators can help decision-makers evaluate interventions in a complex, multi-sectoral injury system. We aimed to create indicators for road safety, seniors falls, and ‘all-injuries’ to inform and evaluate injury prevention initiatives in British Columbia, Canada. The indicator development process involved a five-stage mixed methodology approach, including an environmental scan of existing indicators, generating expert consensus, selection of decision-makers and conducting a survey, selection of final indicators, and specification of indicators. An Indicator Reference Group (IRG) reviewed the list of indicators retrieved in the environmental scan and selected candidate indicators through expert consensus based on importance, modifiability, acceptance, and practicality. Key decision-makers (n = 561) were invited to rank each indicator in terms of importance and actionability (online survey). The IRG applied inclusion criteria and thresholds to survey responses from decision-makers, which resulted in the selection of 47 road safety, 18 seniors falls, and 33 all-injury indicators. After grouping “like” indicators, a final list of 23 road safety, 8 seniors falls, and 13 all-injury indicators were specified. By considering both decision-maker ranking and expert opinion, we anticipate improved injury system performance through advocacy, accountability, and evidence-based resource allocation in priority areas. Our indicators will inform a data management framework for whole-system reporting to drive policy and funding for provincial injury prevention improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8621597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86215972021-11-27 Development of Policy-Relevant Indicators for Injury Prevention in British Columbia by the Key Decision-Makers Oakey, Megan Evans, David C. Copley, Tobin T. Karbakhsh, Mojgan Samarakkody, Diana Brubacher, Jeff R. Pawer, Samantha Zheng, Alex Rajabali, Fahra Fyfe, Murray Pike, Ian Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Indicators can help decision-makers evaluate interventions in a complex, multi-sectoral injury system. We aimed to create indicators for road safety, seniors falls, and ‘all-injuries’ to inform and evaluate injury prevention initiatives in British Columbia, Canada. The indicator development process involved a five-stage mixed methodology approach, including an environmental scan of existing indicators, generating expert consensus, selection of decision-makers and conducting a survey, selection of final indicators, and specification of indicators. An Indicator Reference Group (IRG) reviewed the list of indicators retrieved in the environmental scan and selected candidate indicators through expert consensus based on importance, modifiability, acceptance, and practicality. Key decision-makers (n = 561) were invited to rank each indicator in terms of importance and actionability (online survey). The IRG applied inclusion criteria and thresholds to survey responses from decision-makers, which resulted in the selection of 47 road safety, 18 seniors falls, and 33 all-injury indicators. After grouping “like” indicators, a final list of 23 road safety, 8 seniors falls, and 13 all-injury indicators were specified. By considering both decision-maker ranking and expert opinion, we anticipate improved injury system performance through advocacy, accountability, and evidence-based resource allocation in priority areas. Our indicators will inform a data management framework for whole-system reporting to drive policy and funding for provincial injury prevention improvement. MDPI 2021-11-11 /pmc/articles/PMC8621597/ /pubmed/34831591 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211837 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Oakey, Megan
Evans, David C.
Copley, Tobin T.
Karbakhsh, Mojgan
Samarakkody, Diana
Brubacher, Jeff R.
Pawer, Samantha
Zheng, Alex
Rajabali, Fahra
Fyfe, Murray
Pike, Ian
Development of Policy-Relevant Indicators for Injury Prevention in British Columbia by the Key Decision-Makers
title Development of Policy-Relevant Indicators for Injury Prevention in British Columbia by the Key Decision-Makers
title_full Development of Policy-Relevant Indicators for Injury Prevention in British Columbia by the Key Decision-Makers
title_fullStr Development of Policy-Relevant Indicators for Injury Prevention in British Columbia by the Key Decision-Makers
title_full_unstemmed Development of Policy-Relevant Indicators for Injury Prevention in British Columbia by the Key Decision-Makers
title_short Development of Policy-Relevant Indicators for Injury Prevention in British Columbia by the Key Decision-Makers
title_sort development of policy-relevant indicators for injury prevention in british columbia by the key decision-makers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831591
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211837
work_keys_str_mv AT oakeymegan developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT evansdavidc developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT copleytobint developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT karbakhshmojgan developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT samarakkodydiana developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT brubacherjeffr developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT pawersamantha developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT zhengalex developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT rajabalifahra developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT fyfemurray developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers
AT pikeian developmentofpolicyrelevantindicatorsforinjurypreventioninbritishcolumbiabythekeydecisionmakers