Cargando…

Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal

Background: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)-based reports in pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the staging phase in order to improve communicatio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Granata, Vincenza, Morana, Giovanni, D’Onofrio, Mirko, Fusco, Roberta, Coppola, Francesca, Grassi, Francesca, Cappabianca, Salvatore, Reginelli, Alfonso, Maggialetti, Nicola, Buccicardi, Duccio, Barile, Antonio, Rengo, Marco, Bortolotto, Chandra, Urraro, Fabrizio, La Casella, Giorgia Viola, Montella, Marco, Ciaghi, Eleonora, Bellifemine, Francesco, De Muzio, Federica, Danti, Ginevra, Grazzini, Giulia, Barresi, Carmelo, Brunese, Luca, Neri, Emanuele, Grassi, Roberto, Miele, Vittorio, Faggioni, Lorenzo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112033
_version_ 1784605499869626368
author Granata, Vincenza
Morana, Giovanni
D’Onofrio, Mirko
Fusco, Roberta
Coppola, Francesca
Grassi, Francesca
Cappabianca, Salvatore
Reginelli, Alfonso
Maggialetti, Nicola
Buccicardi, Duccio
Barile, Antonio
Rengo, Marco
Bortolotto, Chandra
Urraro, Fabrizio
La Casella, Giorgia Viola
Montella, Marco
Ciaghi, Eleonora
Bellifemine, Francesco
De Muzio, Federica
Danti, Ginevra
Grazzini, Giulia
Barresi, Carmelo
Brunese, Luca
Neri, Emanuele
Grassi, Roberto
Miele, Vittorio
Faggioni, Lorenzo
author_facet Granata, Vincenza
Morana, Giovanni
D’Onofrio, Mirko
Fusco, Roberta
Coppola, Francesca
Grassi, Francesca
Cappabianca, Salvatore
Reginelli, Alfonso
Maggialetti, Nicola
Buccicardi, Duccio
Barile, Antonio
Rengo, Marco
Bortolotto, Chandra
Urraro, Fabrizio
La Casella, Giorgia Viola
Montella, Marco
Ciaghi, Eleonora
Bellifemine, Francesco
De Muzio, Federica
Danti, Ginevra
Grazzini, Giulia
Barresi, Carmelo
Brunese, Luca
Neri, Emanuele
Grassi, Roberto
Miele, Vittorio
Faggioni, Lorenzo
author_sort Granata, Vincenza
collection PubMed
description Background: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)-based reports in pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. Materials and Methods: A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A modified Delphi process was used to develop the CT-SR and MRI-SR, assessing a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. Results: The final CT-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n = 11 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n = 7 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n = 18 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 52 items were included in the final version of the CT-SR. The final MRI-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n = 11 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n = 8 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n = 14 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 49 items were included in the final version of the MRI-SR. In the first round for CT-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.85. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.85. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.87, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.94. In the first round, for MRI-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.73. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.82. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.91, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.93. Conclusions: The CT-SR and MRI-SR are based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise derived from the multidisciplinary agreement of expert radiologists in order to obtain more appropriate communication tools for referring physicians.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8621603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86216032021-11-27 Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal Granata, Vincenza Morana, Giovanni D’Onofrio, Mirko Fusco, Roberta Coppola, Francesca Grassi, Francesca Cappabianca, Salvatore Reginelli, Alfonso Maggialetti, Nicola Buccicardi, Duccio Barile, Antonio Rengo, Marco Bortolotto, Chandra Urraro, Fabrizio La Casella, Giorgia Viola Montella, Marco Ciaghi, Eleonora Bellifemine, Francesco De Muzio, Federica Danti, Ginevra Grazzini, Giulia Barresi, Carmelo Brunese, Luca Neri, Emanuele Grassi, Roberto Miele, Vittorio Faggioni, Lorenzo Diagnostics (Basel) Article Background: Structured reporting (SR) in radiology has been recognized recently by major scientific societies. This study aims to build structured computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR)-based reports in pancreatic adenocarcinoma during the staging phase in order to improve communication between the radiologist and members of multidisciplinary teams. Materials and Methods: A panel of expert radiologists, members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology, was established. A modified Delphi process was used to develop the CT-SR and MRI-SR, assessing a level of agreement for all report sections. Cronbach’s alpha (Cα) correlation coefficient was used to assess internal consistency for each section and to measure quality analysis according to the average inter-item correlation. Results: The final CT-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n = 11 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n = 7 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n = 18 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 52 items were included in the final version of the CT-SR. The final MRI-SR version was built by including n = 16 items in the “Patient Clinical Data” section, n = 11 items in the “Clinical Evaluation” section, n = 8 items in the “Imaging Protocol” section, and n = 14 items in the “Report” section. Overall, 49 items were included in the final version of the MRI-SR. In the first round for CT-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.85. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.85. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.87, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.94. In the first round, for MRI-SR, all sections received more than a good rating. The overall mean score of the experts was 4.73. The Cα correlation coefficient was 0.82. In the second round, the overall mean score of the experts was 4.91, and the Cα correlation coefficient was 0.93. Conclusions: The CT-SR and MRI-SR are based on a multi-round consensus-building Delphi exercise derived from the multidisciplinary agreement of expert radiologists in order to obtain more appropriate communication tools for referring physicians. MDPI 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8621603/ /pubmed/34829384 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112033 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Granata, Vincenza
Morana, Giovanni
D’Onofrio, Mirko
Fusco, Roberta
Coppola, Francesca
Grassi, Francesca
Cappabianca, Salvatore
Reginelli, Alfonso
Maggialetti, Nicola
Buccicardi, Duccio
Barile, Antonio
Rengo, Marco
Bortolotto, Chandra
Urraro, Fabrizio
La Casella, Giorgia Viola
Montella, Marco
Ciaghi, Eleonora
Bellifemine, Francesco
De Muzio, Federica
Danti, Ginevra
Grazzini, Giulia
Barresi, Carmelo
Brunese, Luca
Neri, Emanuele
Grassi, Roberto
Miele, Vittorio
Faggioni, Lorenzo
Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
title Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
title_full Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
title_fullStr Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
title_full_unstemmed Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
title_short Structured Reporting of Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance in the Staging of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: A Delphi Consensus Proposal
title_sort structured reporting of computed tomography and magnetic resonance in the staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a delphi consensus proposal
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8621603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829384
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11112033
work_keys_str_mv AT granatavincenza structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT moranagiovanni structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT donofriomirko structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT fuscoroberta structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT coppolafrancesca structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT grassifrancesca structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT cappabiancasalvatore structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT reginellialfonso structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT maggialettinicola structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT buccicardiduccio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT barileantonio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT rengomarco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT bortolottochandra structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT urrarofabrizio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT lacasellagiorgiaviola structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT montellamarco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT ciaghieleonora structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT bellifeminefrancesco structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT demuziofederica structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT dantiginevra structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT grazzinigiulia structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT barresicarmelo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT bruneseluca structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT neriemanuele structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT grassiroberto structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT mielevittorio structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal
AT faggionilorenzo structuredreportingofcomputedtomographyandmagneticresonanceinthestagingofpancreaticadenocarcinomaadelphiconsensusproposal