Cargando…

Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China

China experienced rapid urbanization and socioeconomic development at an unusual rate during the past four decades. Against such background, land use evolution and land ecological security have both been affected in a volatile way. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the land use and the land...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhu, Yong, Zhong, Shihu, Wang, Ying, Liu, Muhua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212076
_version_ 1784605604943233024
author Zhu, Yong
Zhong, Shihu
Wang, Ying
Liu, Muhua
author_facet Zhu, Yong
Zhong, Shihu
Wang, Ying
Liu, Muhua
author_sort Zhu, Yong
collection PubMed
description China experienced rapid urbanization and socioeconomic development at an unusual rate during the past four decades. Against such background, land use evolution and land ecological security have both been affected in a volatile way. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the land use and the land ecological security in China. However, the traditional assessment approaches have paid more attention to the environmental and economic factors than the sustainable development of ecology, which cannot comprehensively assess the land ecological security. From the perspective of ecological sustainable development, this study identifies 3 main factors and 17 sub-factors. We also construct a model to integrate the FCE approach with the AHP. The results show that from 2004 to 2017, China’s land use structure was unbalanced. The construction land, mining land, and cultivated land increased rapidly, leading to the shrinkage of ecological land. Moreover, the weight of the sustainable development of resources and the environment, economic sustainable development, social sustainable development are 0.3341, 0.3780, and 0.2879, respectively, demonstrating that economic sustainable development is the most important factor affecting land ecological security. Finally, although the value of comprehensive land ecological security in China has been on the rise from 2004 to 2017, it remains at an unsecured level. Moreover, the value of the sustainable development of resources and the environment has been declining since 2011 and is lower than the values of economic sustainable development and social sustainable development. This study demonstrates that more attention should be paid to enhancing land ecological security, especially promoting the sustainable development of resources and the environment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8622059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86220592021-11-27 Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China Zhu, Yong Zhong, Shihu Wang, Ying Liu, Muhua Int J Environ Res Public Health Article China experienced rapid urbanization and socioeconomic development at an unusual rate during the past four decades. Against such background, land use evolution and land ecological security have both been affected in a volatile way. Therefore, it is necessary to investigate the land use and the land ecological security in China. However, the traditional assessment approaches have paid more attention to the environmental and economic factors than the sustainable development of ecology, which cannot comprehensively assess the land ecological security. From the perspective of ecological sustainable development, this study identifies 3 main factors and 17 sub-factors. We also construct a model to integrate the FCE approach with the AHP. The results show that from 2004 to 2017, China’s land use structure was unbalanced. The construction land, mining land, and cultivated land increased rapidly, leading to the shrinkage of ecological land. Moreover, the weight of the sustainable development of resources and the environment, economic sustainable development, social sustainable development are 0.3341, 0.3780, and 0.2879, respectively, demonstrating that economic sustainable development is the most important factor affecting land ecological security. Finally, although the value of comprehensive land ecological security in China has been on the rise from 2004 to 2017, it remains at an unsecured level. Moreover, the value of the sustainable development of resources and the environment has been declining since 2011 and is lower than the values of economic sustainable development and social sustainable development. This study demonstrates that more attention should be paid to enhancing land ecological security, especially promoting the sustainable development of resources and the environment. MDPI 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8622059/ /pubmed/34831836 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212076 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhu, Yong
Zhong, Shihu
Wang, Ying
Liu, Muhua
Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China
title Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China
title_full Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China
title_fullStr Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China
title_full_unstemmed Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China
title_short Land Use Evolution and Land Ecological Security Evaluation Based on AHP-FCE Model: Evidence from China
title_sort land use evolution and land ecological security evaluation based on ahp-fce model: evidence from china
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831836
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182212076
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuyong landuseevolutionandlandecologicalsecurityevaluationbasedonahpfcemodelevidencefromchina
AT zhongshihu landuseevolutionandlandecologicalsecurityevaluationbasedonahpfcemodelevidencefromchina
AT wangying landuseevolutionandlandecologicalsecurityevaluationbasedonahpfcemodelevidencefromchina
AT liumuhua landuseevolutionandlandecologicalsecurityevaluationbasedonahpfcemodelevidencefromchina