Cargando…

Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse

We reviewed the results of local surgical treatment of stoma prolapse, a long-term complication of stoma construction. Fifteen patients treated for stomal prolapse between 2009 and 2020 at the authors’ and affiliated hospitals were included in this study. The treatment comprised local laparotomic st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kosuge, Makoto, Ohkuma, Masahisa, Koyama, Muneyuki, Kobayashi, Yasunobu, Nakano, Takafumi, Takano, Yasuhiro, Shimoyama, Yuya, Takada, Naoki, Kumamoto, Tomotaka, Imaizumi, Yuta, Sugano, Hiroshi, Eto, Seiichiro, Takeda, Yasuhiro, Yatabe, Saori, Eto, Ken
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225438
_version_ 1784605614693941248
author Kosuge, Makoto
Ohkuma, Masahisa
Koyama, Muneyuki
Kobayashi, Yasunobu
Nakano, Takafumi
Takano, Yasuhiro
Shimoyama, Yuya
Takada, Naoki
Kumamoto, Tomotaka
Imaizumi, Yuta
Sugano, Hiroshi
Eto, Seiichiro
Takeda, Yasuhiro
Yatabe, Saori
Eto, Ken
author_facet Kosuge, Makoto
Ohkuma, Masahisa
Koyama, Muneyuki
Kobayashi, Yasunobu
Nakano, Takafumi
Takano, Yasuhiro
Shimoyama, Yuya
Takada, Naoki
Kumamoto, Tomotaka
Imaizumi, Yuta
Sugano, Hiroshi
Eto, Seiichiro
Takeda, Yasuhiro
Yatabe, Saori
Eto, Ken
author_sort Kosuge, Makoto
collection PubMed
description We reviewed the results of local surgical treatment of stoma prolapse, a long-term complication of stoma construction. Fifteen patients treated for stomal prolapse between 2009 and 2020 at the authors’ and affiliated hospitals were included in this study. The treatment comprised local laparotomic stomal reconstruction (LLSR) in nine patients and stapling repair (SR) in six. We compared and evaluated the clinical and surgical information and postoperative complications. Operation time was significantly shorter in the SR group than in the LLSR group: 20 and 53 min, respectively (p = 0.036). The duration of postoperative hospitalization was shorter in the SR group than in the LLSR group: 5.5 and 8 days, respectively; the difference was not significant (p = 0.088). No short-term complications were found in either group. Regarding long-term, postoperative complications, parastomal hernias developed after 2.5 years in one patient in the LLSR group and after 6 months in one patient in the SR group; both patients had histories of parastomal hernia surgery and had relatively high body mass indices. Local surgery for stomal prolapse was minimally invasive and performed safely. In patients with a history of surgery for parastomal hernia, attention must be paid to the potential of parastomal hernia developing as a postoperative complication.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8622099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86220992021-11-27 Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse Kosuge, Makoto Ohkuma, Masahisa Koyama, Muneyuki Kobayashi, Yasunobu Nakano, Takafumi Takano, Yasuhiro Shimoyama, Yuya Takada, Naoki Kumamoto, Tomotaka Imaizumi, Yuta Sugano, Hiroshi Eto, Seiichiro Takeda, Yasuhiro Yatabe, Saori Eto, Ken J Clin Med Article We reviewed the results of local surgical treatment of stoma prolapse, a long-term complication of stoma construction. Fifteen patients treated for stomal prolapse between 2009 and 2020 at the authors’ and affiliated hospitals were included in this study. The treatment comprised local laparotomic stomal reconstruction (LLSR) in nine patients and stapling repair (SR) in six. We compared and evaluated the clinical and surgical information and postoperative complications. Operation time was significantly shorter in the SR group than in the LLSR group: 20 and 53 min, respectively (p = 0.036). The duration of postoperative hospitalization was shorter in the SR group than in the LLSR group: 5.5 and 8 days, respectively; the difference was not significant (p = 0.088). No short-term complications were found in either group. Regarding long-term, postoperative complications, parastomal hernias developed after 2.5 years in one patient in the LLSR group and after 6 months in one patient in the SR group; both patients had histories of parastomal hernia surgery and had relatively high body mass indices. Local surgery for stomal prolapse was minimally invasive and performed safely. In patients with a history of surgery for parastomal hernia, attention must be paid to the potential of parastomal hernia developing as a postoperative complication. MDPI 2021-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8622099/ /pubmed/34830719 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225438 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kosuge, Makoto
Ohkuma, Masahisa
Koyama, Muneyuki
Kobayashi, Yasunobu
Nakano, Takafumi
Takano, Yasuhiro
Shimoyama, Yuya
Takada, Naoki
Kumamoto, Tomotaka
Imaizumi, Yuta
Sugano, Hiroshi
Eto, Seiichiro
Takeda, Yasuhiro
Yatabe, Saori
Eto, Ken
Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse
title Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse
title_full Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse
title_short Evaluation of the Outcome of Local Surgery for Stomal Prolapse
title_sort evaluation of the outcome of local surgery for stomal prolapse
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34830719
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10225438
work_keys_str_mv AT kosugemakoto evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT ohkumamasahisa evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT koyamamuneyuki evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT kobayashiyasunobu evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT nakanotakafumi evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT takanoyasuhiro evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT shimoyamayuya evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT takadanaoki evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT kumamototomotaka evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT imaizumiyuta evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT suganohiroshi evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT etoseiichiro evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT takedayasuhiro evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT yatabesaori evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse
AT etoken evaluationoftheoutcomeoflocalsurgeryforstomalprolapse