Cargando…

Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L.

Olive, Olea europaea L., is a tree of great economic and cultural importance in the Mediterranean basin. Thousands of cultivars have been described, of which around 1200 are conserved in the different olive germplasm banks. The genetic characterisation of these cultivars can be performed in differen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Friel, James, Bombarely, Aureliano, Fornell, Carmen Dorca, Luque, Francisco, Fernández-Ocaña, Ana Maria
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34834877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10112514
_version_ 1784605619723960320
author Friel, James
Bombarely, Aureliano
Fornell, Carmen Dorca
Luque, Francisco
Fernández-Ocaña, Ana Maria
author_facet Friel, James
Bombarely, Aureliano
Fornell, Carmen Dorca
Luque, Francisco
Fernández-Ocaña, Ana Maria
author_sort Friel, James
collection PubMed
description Olive, Olea europaea L., is a tree of great economic and cultural importance in the Mediterranean basin. Thousands of cultivars have been described, of which around 1200 are conserved in the different olive germplasm banks. The genetic characterisation of these cultivars can be performed in different ways. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides more information than the reduced representation methods such as genotype by sequencing (GBS), but at a much higher cost. This may change as the cost of sequencing continues to drop, but, currently, genotyping hundreds of cultivars using WGS is not a realistic goal for most research groups. Our aim is to systematically compare both methodologies applied to olive genotyping and summarise any possible recommendations for the geneticists and molecular breeders of the olive scientific community. In this work, we used a selection of 24 cultivars from an olive core collection from the World Olive Germplasm Collection of the Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (WOGBC), which represent the most of the cultivars present in cultivated fields over the world. Our results show that both methodologies deliver similar results in the context of phylogenetic analysis and popular population genetic analysis methods such as clustering. Furthermore, WGS and GBS datasets from different experiments can be merged in a single dataset to perform these analytical methodologies with proper filtering. We also tested the influence of the different olive reference genomes in this type of analysis, finding that they have almost no effect when estimating genetic relationships. This work represents the first comparative study between both sequencing techniques in olive. Our results demonstrate that the use of GBS is a perfectly viable option for replacing WGS and reducing research costs when the goal of the experiment is to characterise the genetic relationship between different accessions. Besides this, we show that it is possible to combine variants from GBS and WGS datasets, allowing the reuse of publicly available data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8622120
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86221202021-11-27 Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L. Friel, James Bombarely, Aureliano Fornell, Carmen Dorca Luque, Francisco Fernández-Ocaña, Ana Maria Plants (Basel) Article Olive, Olea europaea L., is a tree of great economic and cultural importance in the Mediterranean basin. Thousands of cultivars have been described, of which around 1200 are conserved in the different olive germplasm banks. The genetic characterisation of these cultivars can be performed in different ways. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) provides more information than the reduced representation methods such as genotype by sequencing (GBS), but at a much higher cost. This may change as the cost of sequencing continues to drop, but, currently, genotyping hundreds of cultivars using WGS is not a realistic goal for most research groups. Our aim is to systematically compare both methodologies applied to olive genotyping and summarise any possible recommendations for the geneticists and molecular breeders of the olive scientific community. In this work, we used a selection of 24 cultivars from an olive core collection from the World Olive Germplasm Collection of the Andalusian Institute of Agricultural and Fisheries Research and Training (WOGBC), which represent the most of the cultivars present in cultivated fields over the world. Our results show that both methodologies deliver similar results in the context of phylogenetic analysis and popular population genetic analysis methods such as clustering. Furthermore, WGS and GBS datasets from different experiments can be merged in a single dataset to perform these analytical methodologies with proper filtering. We also tested the influence of the different olive reference genomes in this type of analysis, finding that they have almost no effect when estimating genetic relationships. This work represents the first comparative study between both sequencing techniques in olive. Our results demonstrate that the use of GBS is a perfectly viable option for replacing WGS and reducing research costs when the goal of the experiment is to characterise the genetic relationship between different accessions. Besides this, we show that it is possible to combine variants from GBS and WGS datasets, allowing the reuse of publicly available data. MDPI 2021-11-19 /pmc/articles/PMC8622120/ /pubmed/34834877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10112514 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Friel, James
Bombarely, Aureliano
Fornell, Carmen Dorca
Luque, Francisco
Fernández-Ocaña, Ana Maria
Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L.
title Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L.
title_full Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L.
title_fullStr Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L.
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L.
title_short Comparative Analysis of Genotyping by Sequencing and Whole-Genome Sequencing Methods in Diversity Studies of Olea europaea L.
title_sort comparative analysis of genotyping by sequencing and whole-genome sequencing methods in diversity studies of olea europaea l.
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622120/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34834877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/plants10112514
work_keys_str_mv AT frieljames comparativeanalysisofgenotypingbysequencingandwholegenomesequencingmethodsindiversitystudiesofoleaeuropaeal
AT bombarelyaureliano comparativeanalysisofgenotypingbysequencingandwholegenomesequencingmethodsindiversitystudiesofoleaeuropaeal
AT fornellcarmendorca comparativeanalysisofgenotypingbysequencingandwholegenomesequencingmethodsindiversitystudiesofoleaeuropaeal
AT luquefrancisco comparativeanalysisofgenotypingbysequencingandwholegenomesequencingmethodsindiversitystudiesofoleaeuropaeal
AT fernandezocanaanamaria comparativeanalysisofgenotypingbysequencingandwholegenomesequencingmethodsindiversitystudiesofoleaeuropaeal