Cargando…
Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a TDI-Derived Systolic Wall Motion Analysis as a Screening Modality for Allograft Rejection after Heart Transplantation
Background: Despite the risk for complications, allograft surveillance after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is performed by cardiac catheterization and biopsies. We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of a TDI-derived systolic wall motion analysis of the posterobasal wall of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11111206 |
_version_ | 1784605647059288064 |
---|---|
author | Just, Isabell A. Guelfirat, Meryem Leser, Laura Uecertas, Ata Kopp Fernandes, Laurenz Godde, Maren Merke, Nicolas Stawowy, Philipp Hennig, Felix Knosalla, Christoph Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan Schoenrath, Felix |
author_facet | Just, Isabell A. Guelfirat, Meryem Leser, Laura Uecertas, Ata Kopp Fernandes, Laurenz Godde, Maren Merke, Nicolas Stawowy, Philipp Hennig, Felix Knosalla, Christoph Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan Schoenrath, Felix |
author_sort | Just, Isabell A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Despite the risk for complications, allograft surveillance after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is performed by cardiac catheterization and biopsies. We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of a TDI-derived systolic wall motion analysis of the posterobasal wall of the left ventricle (Sm) as a screening modality in OHT aftercare. Methods: We examined data of 210 eligible patients who underwent OHT between 2010 and 2020. Forty-four patients who had died within the initial hospital stay were excluded. For 166 patients, baseline and follow-up data were analyzed. The mean age at OHT was 46.2 (±11.4) years; 76.5% were male. Results: Within the observational period, 22 (13.3%) patients died. In total, 170 episodes of acute cellular or humoral rejections occurred (84 ISHLT1R; 13 ISHLT2R; 8 ISHLT3R; 65 AMR), and 29 catheterizations revealed cardiac allograft vasculopathy (5 CAV1; 4 CAV2; 20 CAV3). Individual Sm radial/longitudinal remained stable within the follow-up period (11.5 ± 2.2 cm/s; 10.9 ± 2.1 cm/s). Patients with acute rejections and CAV3 showed significant Sm radial/longitudinal reductions (AMR1: 1.6 ± 1.9 cm/s, confidence interval (CI) 0.77–0.243, p < 0.001; 1.8 ± 2.0 cm/s, CI 0.92–0.267, p < 0.001. ISHLT1R: 1.7 ± 1.8 cm/s, CI 1.32–2.08, p < 0.001; 2.0 ± 1.6 cm/s, CI 1.66–2.34, p < 0.001. CAV3: 1.3 ± 2.5 cm/s, CI 0.23–2.43, p < 0.017; 1.4 ± 2.8 cm/s, CI 0.21–2.66, p < 0.021). Lower Sm was associated with a threefold increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 3.24, CI 1.2–8.76, p = 0.020; HR 2.92, CI 1.19–7.18, p = 0.019). Overall, Sm-triggered surveillance led to 0.75 invasive diagnostics per patient post-OHT year. Conclusions: Sm remained stable in the post-OHT course. Reductions indicated ISHLT1R, AMR1 and CAV3 and were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Sm-triggered surveillance may be referred to as a safe, high-yield screening modality in OHT aftercare. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8622239 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86222392021-11-27 Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a TDI-Derived Systolic Wall Motion Analysis as a Screening Modality for Allograft Rejection after Heart Transplantation Just, Isabell A. Guelfirat, Meryem Leser, Laura Uecertas, Ata Kopp Fernandes, Laurenz Godde, Maren Merke, Nicolas Stawowy, Philipp Hennig, Felix Knosalla, Christoph Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan Schoenrath, Felix Life (Basel) Article Background: Despite the risk for complications, allograft surveillance after orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) is performed by cardiac catheterization and biopsies. We investigated the diagnostic and prognostic value of a TDI-derived systolic wall motion analysis of the posterobasal wall of the left ventricle (Sm) as a screening modality in OHT aftercare. Methods: We examined data of 210 eligible patients who underwent OHT between 2010 and 2020. Forty-four patients who had died within the initial hospital stay were excluded. For 166 patients, baseline and follow-up data were analyzed. The mean age at OHT was 46.2 (±11.4) years; 76.5% were male. Results: Within the observational period, 22 (13.3%) patients died. In total, 170 episodes of acute cellular or humoral rejections occurred (84 ISHLT1R; 13 ISHLT2R; 8 ISHLT3R; 65 AMR), and 29 catheterizations revealed cardiac allograft vasculopathy (5 CAV1; 4 CAV2; 20 CAV3). Individual Sm radial/longitudinal remained stable within the follow-up period (11.5 ± 2.2 cm/s; 10.9 ± 2.1 cm/s). Patients with acute rejections and CAV3 showed significant Sm radial/longitudinal reductions (AMR1: 1.6 ± 1.9 cm/s, confidence interval (CI) 0.77–0.243, p < 0.001; 1.8 ± 2.0 cm/s, CI 0.92–0.267, p < 0.001. ISHLT1R: 1.7 ± 1.8 cm/s, CI 1.32–2.08, p < 0.001; 2.0 ± 1.6 cm/s, CI 1.66–2.34, p < 0.001. CAV3: 1.3 ± 2.5 cm/s, CI 0.23–2.43, p < 0.017; 1.4 ± 2.8 cm/s, CI 0.21–2.66, p < 0.021). Lower Sm was associated with a threefold increase in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 3.24, CI 1.2–8.76, p = 0.020; HR 2.92, CI 1.19–7.18, p = 0.019). Overall, Sm-triggered surveillance led to 0.75 invasive diagnostics per patient post-OHT year. Conclusions: Sm remained stable in the post-OHT course. Reductions indicated ISHLT1R, AMR1 and CAV3 and were associated with higher all-cause mortality. Sm-triggered surveillance may be referred to as a safe, high-yield screening modality in OHT aftercare. MDPI 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8622239/ /pubmed/34833082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11111206 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Just, Isabell A. Guelfirat, Meryem Leser, Laura Uecertas, Ata Kopp Fernandes, Laurenz Godde, Maren Merke, Nicolas Stawowy, Philipp Hennig, Felix Knosalla, Christoph Falk, Volkmar Knierim, Jan Schoenrath, Felix Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a TDI-Derived Systolic Wall Motion Analysis as a Screening Modality for Allograft Rejection after Heart Transplantation |
title | Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a TDI-Derived Systolic Wall Motion Analysis as a Screening Modality for Allograft Rejection after Heart Transplantation |
title_full | Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a TDI-Derived Systolic Wall Motion Analysis as a Screening Modality for Allograft Rejection after Heart Transplantation |
title_fullStr | Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a TDI-Derived Systolic Wall Motion Analysis as a Screening Modality for Allograft Rejection after Heart Transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a TDI-Derived Systolic Wall Motion Analysis as a Screening Modality for Allograft Rejection after Heart Transplantation |
title_short | Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of a TDI-Derived Systolic Wall Motion Analysis as a Screening Modality for Allograft Rejection after Heart Transplantation |
title_sort | diagnostic and prognostic value of a tdi-derived systolic wall motion analysis as a screening modality for allograft rejection after heart transplantation |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622239/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833082 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/life11111206 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT justisabella diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT guelfiratmeryem diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT leserlaura diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT uecertasata diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT koppfernandeslaurenz diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT goddemaren diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT merkenicolas diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT stawowyphilipp diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT hennigfelix diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT knosallachristoph diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT falkvolkmar diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT knierimjan diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation AT schoenrathfelix diagnosticandprognosticvalueofatdiderivedsystolicwallmotionanalysisasascreeningmodalityforallograftrejectionafterhearttransplantation |