Cargando…

Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method

Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rothenberg, Elisabet, Strandhagen, Elisabeth, Samuelsson, Jessica, Ahlner, Felicia, Rydberg Sterner, Therese, Skoog, Ingmar, Lundberg, Christina E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113754
_version_ 1784605721682247680
author Rothenberg, Elisabet
Strandhagen, Elisabeth
Samuelsson, Jessica
Ahlner, Felicia
Rydberg Sterner, Therese
Skoog, Ingmar
Lundberg, Christina E.
author_facet Rothenberg, Elisabet
Strandhagen, Elisabeth
Samuelsson, Jessica
Ahlner, Felicia
Rydberg Sterner, Therese
Skoog, Ingmar
Lundberg, Christina E.
author_sort Rothenberg, Elisabet
collection PubMed
description Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies. The DH registrations were harmonized in accordance with the FFQ frequencies. The agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for the frequency and categorical variables. Bland–Altman plots were used for the numeric variables. The study comprised data from 848 individuals (55.2% women). Overall, there was high agreement between the methods, with the exact and adjacent level of agreement over 80% for eight variables. The proportion attributed to the opposite frequency was fairly low for most of the frequency variables. Most of the kappa values were in fair or moderate agreement. The highest kappa values were calculated for the type of cooking fat (k = 0.68, CI = 0.63–0.72) and sandwich spread (k = 0.55, CI = 0.49–0.53), and the lowest for type of bread (0.13, CI = 0.07–0.20) and sweets (0.22 CI = 0.18–0.27). In conclusion, the FFQ showed overall good agreement compared with the DH. We, therefore, think it, with some improvements, could serve as a simple screening tool for poor dietary patterns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8622557
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86225572021-11-27 Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method Rothenberg, Elisabet Strandhagen, Elisabeth Samuelsson, Jessica Ahlner, Felicia Rydberg Sterner, Therese Skoog, Ingmar Lundberg, Christina E. Nutrients Article Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies. The DH registrations were harmonized in accordance with the FFQ frequencies. The agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for the frequency and categorical variables. Bland–Altman plots were used for the numeric variables. The study comprised data from 848 individuals (55.2% women). Overall, there was high agreement between the methods, with the exact and adjacent level of agreement over 80% for eight variables. The proportion attributed to the opposite frequency was fairly low for most of the frequency variables. Most of the kappa values were in fair or moderate agreement. The highest kappa values were calculated for the type of cooking fat (k = 0.68, CI = 0.63–0.72) and sandwich spread (k = 0.55, CI = 0.49–0.53), and the lowest for type of bread (0.13, CI = 0.07–0.20) and sweets (0.22 CI = 0.18–0.27). In conclusion, the FFQ showed overall good agreement compared with the DH. We, therefore, think it, with some improvements, could serve as a simple screening tool for poor dietary patterns. MDPI 2021-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8622557/ /pubmed/34836011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113754 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Rothenberg, Elisabet
Strandhagen, Elisabeth
Samuelsson, Jessica
Ahlner, Felicia
Rydberg Sterner, Therese
Skoog, Ingmar
Lundberg, Christina E.
Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_full Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_fullStr Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_full_unstemmed Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_short Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
title_sort relative validity of a short 15-item food frequency questionnaire measuring dietary quality, by the diet history method
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836011
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113754
work_keys_str_mv AT rothenbergelisabet relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT strandhagenelisabeth relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT samuelssonjessica relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT ahlnerfelicia relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT rydbergsternertherese relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT skoogingmar relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod
AT lundbergchristinae relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod