Cargando…
Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method
Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113754 |
_version_ | 1784605721682247680 |
---|---|
author | Rothenberg, Elisabet Strandhagen, Elisabeth Samuelsson, Jessica Ahlner, Felicia Rydberg Sterner, Therese Skoog, Ingmar Lundberg, Christina E. |
author_facet | Rothenberg, Elisabet Strandhagen, Elisabeth Samuelsson, Jessica Ahlner, Felicia Rydberg Sterner, Therese Skoog, Ingmar Lundberg, Christina E. |
author_sort | Rothenberg, Elisabet |
collection | PubMed |
description | Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies. The DH registrations were harmonized in accordance with the FFQ frequencies. The agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for the frequency and categorical variables. Bland–Altman plots were used for the numeric variables. The study comprised data from 848 individuals (55.2% women). Overall, there was high agreement between the methods, with the exact and adjacent level of agreement over 80% for eight variables. The proportion attributed to the opposite frequency was fairly low for most of the frequency variables. Most of the kappa values were in fair or moderate agreement. The highest kappa values were calculated for the type of cooking fat (k = 0.68, CI = 0.63–0.72) and sandwich spread (k = 0.55, CI = 0.49–0.53), and the lowest for type of bread (0.13, CI = 0.07–0.20) and sweets (0.22 CI = 0.18–0.27). In conclusion, the FFQ showed overall good agreement compared with the DH. We, therefore, think it, with some improvements, could serve as a simple screening tool for poor dietary patterns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8622557 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86225572021-11-27 Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method Rothenberg, Elisabet Strandhagen, Elisabeth Samuelsson, Jessica Ahlner, Felicia Rydberg Sterner, Therese Skoog, Ingmar Lundberg, Christina E. Nutrients Article Food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) are commonly used dietary assessment tools. The aim was to assess the relative validity of a 15-item FFQ, designed for the screening of poor dietary patterns with a validated diet history (DH). The study population was derived from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies. The DH registrations were harmonized in accordance with the FFQ frequencies. The agreement was assessed by Cohen’s kappa with corresponding confidence intervals (CI) for the frequency and categorical variables. Bland–Altman plots were used for the numeric variables. The study comprised data from 848 individuals (55.2% women). Overall, there was high agreement between the methods, with the exact and adjacent level of agreement over 80% for eight variables. The proportion attributed to the opposite frequency was fairly low for most of the frequency variables. Most of the kappa values were in fair or moderate agreement. The highest kappa values were calculated for the type of cooking fat (k = 0.68, CI = 0.63–0.72) and sandwich spread (k = 0.55, CI = 0.49–0.53), and the lowest for type of bread (0.13, CI = 0.07–0.20) and sweets (0.22 CI = 0.18–0.27). In conclusion, the FFQ showed overall good agreement compared with the DH. We, therefore, think it, with some improvements, could serve as a simple screening tool for poor dietary patterns. MDPI 2021-10-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8622557/ /pubmed/34836011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113754 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rothenberg, Elisabet Strandhagen, Elisabeth Samuelsson, Jessica Ahlner, Felicia Rydberg Sterner, Therese Skoog, Ingmar Lundberg, Christina E. Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title | Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_full | Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_fullStr | Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_short | Relative Validity of a Short 15-Item Food Frequency Questionnaire Measuring Dietary Quality, by the Diet History Method |
title_sort | relative validity of a short 15-item food frequency questionnaire measuring dietary quality, by the diet history method |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622557/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34836011 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nu13113754 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rothenbergelisabet relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT strandhagenelisabeth relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT samuelssonjessica relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT ahlnerfelicia relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT rydbergsternertherese relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT skoogingmar relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod AT lundbergchristinae relativevalidityofashort15itemfoodfrequencyquestionnairemeasuringdietaryqualitybythediethistorymethod |