Cargando…

Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population

It can be assumed that higher SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is associated with higher COVID-19 vaccination intentions, although evidence is scarce. In this large and representative survey of 6007 adults aged 18–64 years and residing in France, 8.1% (95% CI, 7.5–8.8) reported a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Velardo, Fanny, Watson, Verity, Arwidson, Pierre, Alla, François, Luchini, Stéphane, Schwarzinger, Michaël
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111364
_version_ 1784605750529622016
author Velardo, Fanny
Watson, Verity
Arwidson, Pierre
Alla, François
Luchini, Stéphane
Schwarzinger, Michaël
author_facet Velardo, Fanny
Watson, Verity
Arwidson, Pierre
Alla, François
Luchini, Stéphane
Schwarzinger, Michaël
author_sort Velardo, Fanny
collection PubMed
description It can be assumed that higher SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is associated with higher COVID-19 vaccination intentions, although evidence is scarce. In this large and representative survey of 6007 adults aged 18–64 years and residing in France, 8.1% (95% CI, 7.5–8.8) reported a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in December 2020, with regional variations according to an East–West gradient (p < 0.0001). In participants without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was substantial, including 41.3% (95% CI, 39.8–42.8) outright refusal of COVID-19 vaccination. Taking into account five characteristics of the first approved vaccines (efficacy, duration of immunity, safety, country of the vaccine manufacturer, and place of administration) as well as the initial setting of the mass vaccination campaign in France, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance would reach 43.6% (95% CI, 43.0–44.1) at best among working-age adults without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was primarily driven by vaccine characteristics, sociodemographic and attitudinal factors. Considering the region of residency as a proxy of the likelihood of getting infected, our study findings do not support the assumption that SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8622681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86226812021-11-27 Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population Velardo, Fanny Watson, Verity Arwidson, Pierre Alla, François Luchini, Stéphane Schwarzinger, Michaël Vaccines (Basel) Article It can be assumed that higher SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is associated with higher COVID-19 vaccination intentions, although evidence is scarce. In this large and representative survey of 6007 adults aged 18–64 years and residing in France, 8.1% (95% CI, 7.5–8.8) reported a prior SARS-CoV-2 infection in December 2020, with regional variations according to an East–West gradient (p < 0.0001). In participants without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection, COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy was substantial, including 41.3% (95% CI, 39.8–42.8) outright refusal of COVID-19 vaccination. Taking into account five characteristics of the first approved vaccines (efficacy, duration of immunity, safety, country of the vaccine manufacturer, and place of administration) as well as the initial setting of the mass vaccination campaign in France, COVID-19 vaccine acceptance would reach 43.6% (95% CI, 43.0–44.1) at best among working-age adults without prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID-19 vaccine acceptance was primarily driven by vaccine characteristics, sociodemographic and attitudinal factors. Considering the region of residency as a proxy of the likelihood of getting infected, our study findings do not support the assumption that SARS-CoV-2 infection risk is associated with COVID-19 vaccine acceptance. MDPI 2021-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8622681/ /pubmed/34835295 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111364 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Velardo, Fanny
Watson, Verity
Arwidson, Pierre
Alla, François
Luchini, Stéphane
Schwarzinger, Michaël
Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population
title Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population
title_full Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population
title_fullStr Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population
title_full_unstemmed Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population
title_short Regional Differences in COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in December 2020: A Natural Experiment in the French Working-Age Population
title_sort regional differences in covid-19 vaccine hesitancy in december 2020: a natural experiment in the french working-age population
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835295
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vaccines9111364
work_keys_str_mv AT velardofanny regionaldifferencesincovid19vaccinehesitancyindecember2020anaturalexperimentinthefrenchworkingagepopulation
AT watsonverity regionaldifferencesincovid19vaccinehesitancyindecember2020anaturalexperimentinthefrenchworkingagepopulation
AT arwidsonpierre regionaldifferencesincovid19vaccinehesitancyindecember2020anaturalexperimentinthefrenchworkingagepopulation
AT allafrancois regionaldifferencesincovid19vaccinehesitancyindecember2020anaturalexperimentinthefrenchworkingagepopulation
AT luchinistephane regionaldifferencesincovid19vaccinehesitancyindecember2020anaturalexperimentinthefrenchworkingagepopulation
AT schwarzingermichael regionaldifferencesincovid19vaccinehesitancyindecember2020anaturalexperimentinthefrenchworkingagepopulation
AT regionaldifferencesincovid19vaccinehesitancyindecember2020anaturalexperimentinthefrenchworkingagepopulation