Cargando…

Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community

(1) Background: This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge and the perceptions of speech pathology held by a sample of regional mental health practitioners and to explore factors that facilitate understanding of the roles of speech pathologists in mental health. While mental health is reco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janes, Tina, Signal, Tania, Zupan, Barbra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828531
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111485
_version_ 1784605772456394752
author Janes, Tina
Signal, Tania
Zupan, Barbra
author_facet Janes, Tina
Signal, Tania
Zupan, Barbra
author_sort Janes, Tina
collection PubMed
description (1) Background: This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge and the perceptions of speech pathology held by a sample of regional mental health practitioners and to explore factors that facilitate understanding of the roles of speech pathologists in mental health. While mental health is recognised as an area of practice by Speech Pathology Australia, the inclusion of speech pathologists in mental health teams is limited. (2) Methods: An anonymous online survey was created using previously validated surveys and author generated questions and distributed to mental health practitioners in Central Queensland, Australia. (3) Results: Mental health practitioners had difficulty identifying speech pathology involvement when presented with case scenarios. Accuracy was poor for language-based cases, ranging from 28.81% to 37.29%. Participants who reported having worked with a speech pathologist were more likely to demonstrate higher scores on the areas of practice questions, [r(53) = 0.301, p = 0.028], and the language scenarios [r(58) = 0.506, p < 0.001]. They were also more likely to agree to statements regarding the connection between speech pathology and mental health, r(59) = 0.527, p < 0.001. (4) Conclusions: As found in this study, contact with speech pathologists is a strong predictor of mental health providers’ knowledge of the speech pathology profession. Thus, the challenge may be to increase this contact with mental health providers to promote inclusion of speech pathologists in the mental health domain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8622772
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86227722021-11-27 Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community Janes, Tina Signal, Tania Zupan, Barbra Healthcare (Basel) Article (1) Background: This study aimed to determine the level of knowledge and the perceptions of speech pathology held by a sample of regional mental health practitioners and to explore factors that facilitate understanding of the roles of speech pathologists in mental health. While mental health is recognised as an area of practice by Speech Pathology Australia, the inclusion of speech pathologists in mental health teams is limited. (2) Methods: An anonymous online survey was created using previously validated surveys and author generated questions and distributed to mental health practitioners in Central Queensland, Australia. (3) Results: Mental health practitioners had difficulty identifying speech pathology involvement when presented with case scenarios. Accuracy was poor for language-based cases, ranging from 28.81% to 37.29%. Participants who reported having worked with a speech pathologist were more likely to demonstrate higher scores on the areas of practice questions, [r(53) = 0.301, p = 0.028], and the language scenarios [r(58) = 0.506, p < 0.001]. They were also more likely to agree to statements regarding the connection between speech pathology and mental health, r(59) = 0.527, p < 0.001. (4) Conclusions: As found in this study, contact with speech pathologists is a strong predictor of mental health providers’ knowledge of the speech pathology profession. Thus, the challenge may be to increase this contact with mental health providers to promote inclusion of speech pathologists in the mental health domain. MDPI 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8622772/ /pubmed/34828531 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111485 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Janes, Tina
Signal, Tania
Zupan, Barbra
Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_full Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_fullStr Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_full_unstemmed Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_short Mental Health Practitioners’ Understanding of Speech Pathology in a Regional Australian Community
title_sort mental health practitioners’ understanding of speech pathology in a regional australian community
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8622772/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828531
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9111485
work_keys_str_mv AT janestina mentalhealthpractitionersunderstandingofspeechpathologyinaregionalaustraliancommunity
AT signaltania mentalhealthpractitionersunderstandingofspeechpathologyinaregionalaustraliancommunity
AT zupanbarbra mentalhealthpractitionersunderstandingofspeechpathologyinaregionalaustraliancommunity