Cargando…

Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review

Background: Mental health services are currently experiencing much systemic and organisational change. Many countries have adopted a recovery approach to service provision through the development of national policies and frameworks. Within an Irish context, co-production has been identified as one o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Norton, Michael John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211897
_version_ 1784605852192210944
author Norton, Michael John
author_facet Norton, Michael John
author_sort Norton, Michael John
collection PubMed
description Background: Mental health services are currently experiencing much systemic and organisational change. Many countries have adopted a recovery approach to service provision through the development of national policies and frameworks. Within an Irish context, co-production has been identified as one of the four pillars required for services to become recovery orientated. However, there is a paucity of literature relating to the concept within child and adolescent mental health services. This paper aims to synthesise the peer-reviewed evidence on co-production within such services. Methods: A PRISMA compliant systematic review was undertaken. This includes how the reviewer retrieved, shortlisted, and selected studies for inclusion in the review. It outlines the inclusion/exclusion criteria and how these were further developed through the PICO framework. Finally, the methods also outline how the reviewer assessed bias and quality, as well as the process of data synthesis. Results: Two studies were included in this review, both focusing on co-production, but in different contexts within child and adolescent mental health. Two themes were identified: ‘road less travelled’ and ‘co-producing equality’. These themes and the associated sub-themes describe how co-production works in these services. Discussion: These results highlight the paucity of quality literature in co-production within child and adolescent mental health. Both studies scored poorly in terms of quality. Resulting from this review, a number of actions relating to the therapeutic environment need to be taken into account for co-production to be further implemented. Other: The reviewer has not received any funding for this paper. A protocol was not created or registered for this review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8623106
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86231062021-11-27 Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review Norton, Michael John Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Background: Mental health services are currently experiencing much systemic and organisational change. Many countries have adopted a recovery approach to service provision through the development of national policies and frameworks. Within an Irish context, co-production has been identified as one of the four pillars required for services to become recovery orientated. However, there is a paucity of literature relating to the concept within child and adolescent mental health services. This paper aims to synthesise the peer-reviewed evidence on co-production within such services. Methods: A PRISMA compliant systematic review was undertaken. This includes how the reviewer retrieved, shortlisted, and selected studies for inclusion in the review. It outlines the inclusion/exclusion criteria and how these were further developed through the PICO framework. Finally, the methods also outline how the reviewer assessed bias and quality, as well as the process of data synthesis. Results: Two studies were included in this review, both focusing on co-production, but in different contexts within child and adolescent mental health. Two themes were identified: ‘road less travelled’ and ‘co-producing equality’. These themes and the associated sub-themes describe how co-production works in these services. Discussion: These results highlight the paucity of quality literature in co-production within child and adolescent mental health. Both studies scored poorly in terms of quality. Resulting from this review, a number of actions relating to the therapeutic environment need to be taken into account for co-production to be further implemented. Other: The reviewer has not received any funding for this paper. A protocol was not created or registered for this review. MDPI 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8623106/ /pubmed/34831653 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211897 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Norton, Michael John
Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_full Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_short Co-Production within Child and Adolescent Mental Health: A Systematic Review
title_sort co-production within child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623106/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34831653
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211897
work_keys_str_mv AT nortonmichaeljohn coproductionwithinchildandadolescentmentalhealthasystematicreview