Cargando…

Utilizing a Rapid Multi-Plug Filtration Cleanup Method for 72 Pesticide Residues in Grape Wines Followed by Detection with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry

A convenient and fast multi-residue method for the efficient identification and quantification of 72 pesticides belonging to different chemical classes in red and white grape wines has been developed. The analysis was based on gas chromatography tandem quadrupole mass spectrometric determination (GC...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Shaowen, Bai, Aijuan, Song, Le, Zou, Nan, Han, Yongtao, Zhou, Li, Yu, Chuanshan, Li, Changjun, Pan, Canping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829012
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112731
_version_ 1784605898665099264
author Liu, Shaowen
Bai, Aijuan
Song, Le
Zou, Nan
Han, Yongtao
Zhou, Li
Yu, Chuanshan
Li, Changjun
Pan, Canping
author_facet Liu, Shaowen
Bai, Aijuan
Song, Le
Zou, Nan
Han, Yongtao
Zhou, Li
Yu, Chuanshan
Li, Changjun
Pan, Canping
author_sort Liu, Shaowen
collection PubMed
description A convenient and fast multi-residue method for the efficient identification and quantification of 72 pesticides belonging to different chemical classes in red and white grape wines has been developed. The analysis was based on gas chromatography tandem quadrupole mass spectrometric determination (GC–MS/MS). The optimization strategy involved the selection of the amount of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and the number of cleanup procedure cycles for multi-plug filtration cleanup (m-PFC) to achieve ideal recoveries and reduce the sample matrix compounds in the final extracts. The optimized procedure obtained consistent recoveries between 70.2 and 108.8% (70.2 and 108.8% for white wine, and 72.3 and 108.4% for red wine), with relative standard deviations (RSDs) that were generally lower than 9.2% at the three spiking levels of 0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg. The linearity was studied in the range between 0.002 and 0.1 mg/kg using pesticide standards prepared both in pure solvent and in the presence of the matrix, showing coefficients of determination (R(2)) higher than 0.9495 for all the pesticides. To improve accuracy, matrix-matched calibration curves were used for calculating the quantification results. Finally, the method was used successfully for detecting pesticide residues in commercial grape wines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8623294
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86232942021-11-27 Utilizing a Rapid Multi-Plug Filtration Cleanup Method for 72 Pesticide Residues in Grape Wines Followed by Detection with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry Liu, Shaowen Bai, Aijuan Song, Le Zou, Nan Han, Yongtao Zhou, Li Yu, Chuanshan Li, Changjun Pan, Canping Foods Article A convenient and fast multi-residue method for the efficient identification and quantification of 72 pesticides belonging to different chemical classes in red and white grape wines has been developed. The analysis was based on gas chromatography tandem quadrupole mass spectrometric determination (GC–MS/MS). The optimization strategy involved the selection of the amount of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and the number of cleanup procedure cycles for multi-plug filtration cleanup (m-PFC) to achieve ideal recoveries and reduce the sample matrix compounds in the final extracts. The optimized procedure obtained consistent recoveries between 70.2 and 108.8% (70.2 and 108.8% for white wine, and 72.3 and 108.4% for red wine), with relative standard deviations (RSDs) that were generally lower than 9.2% at the three spiking levels of 0.01, 0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg. The linearity was studied in the range between 0.002 and 0.1 mg/kg using pesticide standards prepared both in pure solvent and in the presence of the matrix, showing coefficients of determination (R(2)) higher than 0.9495 for all the pesticides. To improve accuracy, matrix-matched calibration curves were used for calculating the quantification results. Finally, the method was used successfully for detecting pesticide residues in commercial grape wines. MDPI 2021-11-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8623294/ /pubmed/34829012 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112731 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Liu, Shaowen
Bai, Aijuan
Song, Le
Zou, Nan
Han, Yongtao
Zhou, Li
Yu, Chuanshan
Li, Changjun
Pan, Canping
Utilizing a Rapid Multi-Plug Filtration Cleanup Method for 72 Pesticide Residues in Grape Wines Followed by Detection with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title Utilizing a Rapid Multi-Plug Filtration Cleanup Method for 72 Pesticide Residues in Grape Wines Followed by Detection with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_full Utilizing a Rapid Multi-Plug Filtration Cleanup Method for 72 Pesticide Residues in Grape Wines Followed by Detection with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_fullStr Utilizing a Rapid Multi-Plug Filtration Cleanup Method for 72 Pesticide Residues in Grape Wines Followed by Detection with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_full_unstemmed Utilizing a Rapid Multi-Plug Filtration Cleanup Method for 72 Pesticide Residues in Grape Wines Followed by Detection with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_short Utilizing a Rapid Multi-Plug Filtration Cleanup Method for 72 Pesticide Residues in Grape Wines Followed by Detection with Gas Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry
title_sort utilizing a rapid multi-plug filtration cleanup method for 72 pesticide residues in grape wines followed by detection with gas chromatography tandem mass spectrometry
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623294/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829012
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112731
work_keys_str_mv AT liushaowen utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT baiaijuan utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT songle utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT zounan utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT hanyongtao utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT zhouli utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT yuchuanshan utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT lichangjun utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry
AT pancanping utilizingarapidmultiplugfiltrationcleanupmethodfor72pesticideresiduesingrapewinesfollowedbydetectionwithgaschromatographytandemmassspectrometry