Cargando…

Serious Alert and Border Rejection Notifications on Food in the EU RASFF

The serious alert and border rejection notifications on food from the European Union Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (EU RASFF) database were used to determine their lag phases (from sampling to notification dates). More specifically, 4503 serious alert notifications on food were used to calcul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Papapanagiotou, Elias P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110279
_version_ 1784605921828143104
author Papapanagiotou, Elias P.
author_facet Papapanagiotou, Elias P.
author_sort Papapanagiotou, Elias P.
collection PubMed
description The serious alert and border rejection notifications on food from the European Union Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (EU RASFF) database were used to determine their lag phases (from sampling to notification dates). More specifically, 4503 serious alert notifications on food were used to calculate the percent (%) share of various lag phases in an overall fashion (for all EU RASFF Member States collectively examined) as well as for the top-three Member States (in notification numbers), in each one of seven hazard categories. The same procedure was followed for 5236 serious border rejection notifications in each one of five hazard categories on food. The lag phases calculated revealed a state of nonharmonization (in lag phases percent shares) both overall and among the top-three Member States, and in the same MS in various hazard categories in serious alert but less pronounced in serious border rejection notifications. Thus, a “Performance Effectiveness Reporting (PER)-50/30” indicator (over 50% of notifications being notified to the RASFF within 30 days of sampling) was proposed for both types of serious notifications, and its application herein has revealed volatility in performance effectiveness reporting among the top-three EU RASFF Member States in the hazard categories. Actions to harmonize this inconsistency should be pursued in the context of safeguarding public health, aiming at the fastest possible risk management and risk communication of serious contamination incidents on food. Finally, a proposal of an “RASFF country profile” is hereby proposed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8623392
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86233922021-11-27 Serious Alert and Border Rejection Notifications on Food in the EU RASFF Papapanagiotou, Elias P. Vet Sci Article The serious alert and border rejection notifications on food from the European Union Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed (EU RASFF) database were used to determine their lag phases (from sampling to notification dates). More specifically, 4503 serious alert notifications on food were used to calculate the percent (%) share of various lag phases in an overall fashion (for all EU RASFF Member States collectively examined) as well as for the top-three Member States (in notification numbers), in each one of seven hazard categories. The same procedure was followed for 5236 serious border rejection notifications in each one of five hazard categories on food. The lag phases calculated revealed a state of nonharmonization (in lag phases percent shares) both overall and among the top-three Member States, and in the same MS in various hazard categories in serious alert but less pronounced in serious border rejection notifications. Thus, a “Performance Effectiveness Reporting (PER)-50/30” indicator (over 50% of notifications being notified to the RASFF within 30 days of sampling) was proposed for both types of serious notifications, and its application herein has revealed volatility in performance effectiveness reporting among the top-three EU RASFF Member States in the hazard categories. Actions to harmonize this inconsistency should be pursued in the context of safeguarding public health, aiming at the fastest possible risk management and risk communication of serious contamination incidents on food. Finally, a proposal of an “RASFF country profile” is hereby proposed. MDPI 2021-11-17 /pmc/articles/PMC8623392/ /pubmed/34822652 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110279 Text en © 2021 by the author. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Papapanagiotou, Elias P.
Serious Alert and Border Rejection Notifications on Food in the EU RASFF
title Serious Alert and Border Rejection Notifications on Food in the EU RASFF
title_full Serious Alert and Border Rejection Notifications on Food in the EU RASFF
title_fullStr Serious Alert and Border Rejection Notifications on Food in the EU RASFF
title_full_unstemmed Serious Alert and Border Rejection Notifications on Food in the EU RASFF
title_short Serious Alert and Border Rejection Notifications on Food in the EU RASFF
title_sort serious alert and border rejection notifications on food in the eu rasff
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623392/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822652
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110279
work_keys_str_mv AT papapanagiotoueliasp seriousalertandborderrejectionnotificationsonfoodintheeurasff