Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of the SHFT Running Power Meter

The SHFT device is a novel running wearable consisting of two pods connected to your smartphone issuing several running metrics based on accelerometer and gyroscope technology. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the power output (PO) metric produced by the S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Linkis, Jesper Emil, Bonne, Thomas Christian, Bejder, Jacob, Rasmussen, Esben Krogh, Breenfeldt Andersen, Andreas, Nordsborg, Nikolai Baastrup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227516
_version_ 1784605937136304128
author Linkis, Jesper Emil
Bonne, Thomas Christian
Bejder, Jacob
Rasmussen, Esben Krogh
Breenfeldt Andersen, Andreas
Nordsborg, Nikolai Baastrup
author_facet Linkis, Jesper Emil
Bonne, Thomas Christian
Bejder, Jacob
Rasmussen, Esben Krogh
Breenfeldt Andersen, Andreas
Nordsborg, Nikolai Baastrup
author_sort Linkis, Jesper Emil
collection PubMed
description The SHFT device is a novel running wearable consisting of two pods connected to your smartphone issuing several running metrics based on accelerometer and gyroscope technology. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the power output (PO) metric produced by the SHFT device. To assess reliability, 12 men ran on an outdoor track at 10.5 km·h(−1) and 12 km·h(−1) on two consecutive days. To assess validity, oxygen uptake (VO(2)) and SHFT data from eight men and seven women were collected during incremental submaximal running tests on an indoor treadmill on one to four separate days (34 tests in total). SHFT reliability on the outdoor track was strong with coefficients of variance (CV) of 1.8% and 2.4% for 10.5 and 12 km·h(−1), respectively. We observed a very strong linear relationship between PO and VO(2) (r(2) = 0.54) within subjects, and a very strong linear relationship within each subject within each treadmill test (r(2) = 0.80). We conclude that SHFT provides a reliable running power estimate and that a very strong relationship between SHFT-Power and metabolic rate exists, which places SHFT as one of the leading commercially available running power meters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8623456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86234562021-11-27 Reliability and Validity of the SHFT Running Power Meter Linkis, Jesper Emil Bonne, Thomas Christian Bejder, Jacob Rasmussen, Esben Krogh Breenfeldt Andersen, Andreas Nordsborg, Nikolai Baastrup Sensors (Basel) Communication The SHFT device is a novel running wearable consisting of two pods connected to your smartphone issuing several running metrics based on accelerometer and gyroscope technology. The purpose of this study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the power output (PO) metric produced by the SHFT device. To assess reliability, 12 men ran on an outdoor track at 10.5 km·h(−1) and 12 km·h(−1) on two consecutive days. To assess validity, oxygen uptake (VO(2)) and SHFT data from eight men and seven women were collected during incremental submaximal running tests on an indoor treadmill on one to four separate days (34 tests in total). SHFT reliability on the outdoor track was strong with coefficients of variance (CV) of 1.8% and 2.4% for 10.5 and 12 km·h(−1), respectively. We observed a very strong linear relationship between PO and VO(2) (r(2) = 0.54) within subjects, and a very strong linear relationship within each subject within each treadmill test (r(2) = 0.80). We conclude that SHFT provides a reliable running power estimate and that a very strong relationship between SHFT-Power and metabolic rate exists, which places SHFT as one of the leading commercially available running power meters. MDPI 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8623456/ /pubmed/34833596 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227516 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Linkis, Jesper Emil
Bonne, Thomas Christian
Bejder, Jacob
Rasmussen, Esben Krogh
Breenfeldt Andersen, Andreas
Nordsborg, Nikolai Baastrup
Reliability and Validity of the SHFT Running Power Meter
title Reliability and Validity of the SHFT Running Power Meter
title_full Reliability and Validity of the SHFT Running Power Meter
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of the SHFT Running Power Meter
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of the SHFT Running Power Meter
title_short Reliability and Validity of the SHFT Running Power Meter
title_sort reliability and validity of the shft running power meter
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833596
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227516
work_keys_str_mv AT linkisjesperemil reliabilityandvalidityoftheshftrunningpowermeter
AT bonnethomaschristian reliabilityandvalidityoftheshftrunningpowermeter
AT bejderjacob reliabilityandvalidityoftheshftrunningpowermeter
AT rasmussenesbenkrogh reliabilityandvalidityoftheshftrunningpowermeter
AT breenfeldtandersenandreas reliabilityandvalidityoftheshftrunningpowermeter
AT nordsborgnikolaibaastrup reliabilityandvalidityoftheshftrunningpowermeter