Cargando…
Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
Animal-assisted Interventions (AAI) proliferated rapidly since clinicians and researchers first noted the positive effects animals have on people struggling with physical and mental health concerns. The intersection of AAI with the field of animal welfare evolved from considering animals’ basic need...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110254 |
_version_ | 1784605994983096320 |
---|---|
author | Townsend, Lisa Gee, Nancy R. |
author_facet | Townsend, Lisa Gee, Nancy R. |
author_sort | Townsend, Lisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Animal-assisted Interventions (AAI) proliferated rapidly since clinicians and researchers first noted the positive effects animals have on people struggling with physical and mental health concerns. The intersection of AAI with the field of animal welfare evolved from considering animals’ basic needs, such as freedom from pain, to recognition that animals experience nuanced emotions. Current conceptualizations of the various roles of companion animals as an adjunct to treatments for humans emphasize not only the animals’ physical comfort and autonomy, but also their mental well-being and enjoyment of AAI activities. However, numerous challenges to effective monitoring of animals involved in AAI exist. This article focuses specifically on dogs, highlighting factors that may lead handlers and therapists to miss or ignore canine stress signals during human-animal interactions and offers strategies to recognize and ameliorate dogs’ distress more consistently. The primary goals of this discussion are to summarize the current thinking on canine well-being and to highlight practical applications of animal welfare principles in real-world AAI settings. The paper highlights contextual factors (e.g., physical setting, patient demand), human influences (e.g., desire to help), and intervention characteristics (e.g., presence or absence of a dog-specific advocate) that may promote or inhibit humans’ ability to advocate for therapy dogs during AAI activities. Deidentified examples of each of these factors are discussed, and recommendations are provided to mitigate factors that interfere with timely recognition and amelioration of canine distress. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8623698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86236982021-11-27 Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions Townsend, Lisa Gee, Nancy R. Vet Sci Review Animal-assisted Interventions (AAI) proliferated rapidly since clinicians and researchers first noted the positive effects animals have on people struggling with physical and mental health concerns. The intersection of AAI with the field of animal welfare evolved from considering animals’ basic needs, such as freedom from pain, to recognition that animals experience nuanced emotions. Current conceptualizations of the various roles of companion animals as an adjunct to treatments for humans emphasize not only the animals’ physical comfort and autonomy, but also their mental well-being and enjoyment of AAI activities. However, numerous challenges to effective monitoring of animals involved in AAI exist. This article focuses specifically on dogs, highlighting factors that may lead handlers and therapists to miss or ignore canine stress signals during human-animal interactions and offers strategies to recognize and ameliorate dogs’ distress more consistently. The primary goals of this discussion are to summarize the current thinking on canine well-being and to highlight practical applications of animal welfare principles in real-world AAI settings. The paper highlights contextual factors (e.g., physical setting, patient demand), human influences (e.g., desire to help), and intervention characteristics (e.g., presence or absence of a dog-specific advocate) that may promote or inhibit humans’ ability to advocate for therapy dogs during AAI activities. Deidentified examples of each of these factors are discussed, and recommendations are provided to mitigate factors that interfere with timely recognition and amelioration of canine distress. MDPI 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8623698/ /pubmed/34822627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110254 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Townsend, Lisa Gee, Nancy R. Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions |
title | Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions |
title_full | Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions |
title_fullStr | Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions |
title_full_unstemmed | Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions |
title_short | Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions |
title_sort | recognizing and mitigating canine stress during animal assisted interventions |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110254 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT townsendlisa recognizingandmitigatingcaninestressduringanimalassistedinterventions AT geenancyr recognizingandmitigatingcaninestressduringanimalassistedinterventions |