Cargando…

Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions

Animal-assisted Interventions (AAI) proliferated rapidly since clinicians and researchers first noted the positive effects animals have on people struggling with physical and mental health concerns. The intersection of AAI with the field of animal welfare evolved from considering animals’ basic need...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Townsend, Lisa, Gee, Nancy R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822627
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110254
_version_ 1784605994983096320
author Townsend, Lisa
Gee, Nancy R.
author_facet Townsend, Lisa
Gee, Nancy R.
author_sort Townsend, Lisa
collection PubMed
description Animal-assisted Interventions (AAI) proliferated rapidly since clinicians and researchers first noted the positive effects animals have on people struggling with physical and mental health concerns. The intersection of AAI with the field of animal welfare evolved from considering animals’ basic needs, such as freedom from pain, to recognition that animals experience nuanced emotions. Current conceptualizations of the various roles of companion animals as an adjunct to treatments for humans emphasize not only the animals’ physical comfort and autonomy, but also their mental well-being and enjoyment of AAI activities. However, numerous challenges to effective monitoring of animals involved in AAI exist. This article focuses specifically on dogs, highlighting factors that may lead handlers and therapists to miss or ignore canine stress signals during human-animal interactions and offers strategies to recognize and ameliorate dogs’ distress more consistently. The primary goals of this discussion are to summarize the current thinking on canine well-being and to highlight practical applications of animal welfare principles in real-world AAI settings. The paper highlights contextual factors (e.g., physical setting, patient demand), human influences (e.g., desire to help), and intervention characteristics (e.g., presence or absence of a dog-specific advocate) that may promote or inhibit humans’ ability to advocate for therapy dogs during AAI activities. Deidentified examples of each of these factors are discussed, and recommendations are provided to mitigate factors that interfere with timely recognition and amelioration of canine distress.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8623698
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86236982021-11-27 Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions Townsend, Lisa Gee, Nancy R. Vet Sci Review Animal-assisted Interventions (AAI) proliferated rapidly since clinicians and researchers first noted the positive effects animals have on people struggling with physical and mental health concerns. The intersection of AAI with the field of animal welfare evolved from considering animals’ basic needs, such as freedom from pain, to recognition that animals experience nuanced emotions. Current conceptualizations of the various roles of companion animals as an adjunct to treatments for humans emphasize not only the animals’ physical comfort and autonomy, but also their mental well-being and enjoyment of AAI activities. However, numerous challenges to effective monitoring of animals involved in AAI exist. This article focuses specifically on dogs, highlighting factors that may lead handlers and therapists to miss or ignore canine stress signals during human-animal interactions and offers strategies to recognize and ameliorate dogs’ distress more consistently. The primary goals of this discussion are to summarize the current thinking on canine well-being and to highlight practical applications of animal welfare principles in real-world AAI settings. The paper highlights contextual factors (e.g., physical setting, patient demand), human influences (e.g., desire to help), and intervention characteristics (e.g., presence or absence of a dog-specific advocate) that may promote or inhibit humans’ ability to advocate for therapy dogs during AAI activities. Deidentified examples of each of these factors are discussed, and recommendations are provided to mitigate factors that interfere with timely recognition and amelioration of canine distress. MDPI 2021-10-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8623698/ /pubmed/34822627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110254 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Townsend, Lisa
Gee, Nancy R.
Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
title Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
title_full Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
title_fullStr Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
title_full_unstemmed Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
title_short Recognizing and Mitigating Canine Stress during Animal Assisted Interventions
title_sort recognizing and mitigating canine stress during animal assisted interventions
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623698/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822627
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110254
work_keys_str_mv AT townsendlisa recognizingandmitigatingcaninestressduringanimalassistedinterventions
AT geenancyr recognizingandmitigatingcaninestressduringanimalassistedinterventions