Cargando…
BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models
Artificial intelligence provides modelling on machines by simulating the human brain using learning and decision-making abilities. Early diagnosis is highly effective in reducing mortality in cancer. This study aimed to combine cancer-associated risk factors including genetic variations and design a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12111774 |
_version_ | 1784606056785117184 |
---|---|
author | Senturk, Niyazi Tuncel, Gulten Dogan, Berkcan Aliyeva, Lamiya Dundar, Mehmet Sait Ozemri Sag, Sebnem Mocan, Gamze Temel, Sehime Gulsun Dundar, Munis Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez |
author_facet | Senturk, Niyazi Tuncel, Gulten Dogan, Berkcan Aliyeva, Lamiya Dundar, Mehmet Sait Ozemri Sag, Sebnem Mocan, Gamze Temel, Sehime Gulsun Dundar, Munis Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez |
author_sort | Senturk, Niyazi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Artificial intelligence provides modelling on machines by simulating the human brain using learning and decision-making abilities. Early diagnosis is highly effective in reducing mortality in cancer. This study aimed to combine cancer-associated risk factors including genetic variations and design an artificial intelligence system for risk assessment. Data from a total of 268 breast cancer patients have been analysed for 16 different risk factors including genetic variant classifications. In total, 61 BRCA1, 128 BRCA2 and 11 both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes associated breast cancer patients’ data were used to train the system using Mamdani’s Fuzzy Inference Method and Feed-Forward Neural Network Method as the model softwares on MATLAB. Sixteen different tests were performed on twelve different subjects who had not been introduced to the system before. The rates for neural network were 99.9% for training success, 99.6% for validation success and 99.7% for test success. Despite neural network’s overall success was slightly higher than fuzzy logic accuracy, the results from developed systems were similar (99.9% and 95.5%, respectively). The developed models make predictions from a wider perspective using more risk factors including genetic variation data compared with similar studies in the literature. Overall, this artificial intelligence models present promising results for BRCA variations’ risk assessment in breast cancers as well as a unique tool for personalized medicine software. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8623958 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86239582021-11-27 BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models Senturk, Niyazi Tuncel, Gulten Dogan, Berkcan Aliyeva, Lamiya Dundar, Mehmet Sait Ozemri Sag, Sebnem Mocan, Gamze Temel, Sehime Gulsun Dundar, Munis Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez Genes (Basel) Article Artificial intelligence provides modelling on machines by simulating the human brain using learning and decision-making abilities. Early diagnosis is highly effective in reducing mortality in cancer. This study aimed to combine cancer-associated risk factors including genetic variations and design an artificial intelligence system for risk assessment. Data from a total of 268 breast cancer patients have been analysed for 16 different risk factors including genetic variant classifications. In total, 61 BRCA1, 128 BRCA2 and 11 both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes associated breast cancer patients’ data were used to train the system using Mamdani’s Fuzzy Inference Method and Feed-Forward Neural Network Method as the model softwares on MATLAB. Sixteen different tests were performed on twelve different subjects who had not been introduced to the system before. The rates for neural network were 99.9% for training success, 99.6% for validation success and 99.7% for test success. Despite neural network’s overall success was slightly higher than fuzzy logic accuracy, the results from developed systems were similar (99.9% and 95.5%, respectively). The developed models make predictions from a wider perspective using more risk factors including genetic variation data compared with similar studies in the literature. Overall, this artificial intelligence models present promising results for BRCA variations’ risk assessment in breast cancers as well as a unique tool for personalized medicine software. MDPI 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8623958/ /pubmed/34828379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12111774 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Senturk, Niyazi Tuncel, Gulten Dogan, Berkcan Aliyeva, Lamiya Dundar, Mehmet Sait Ozemri Sag, Sebnem Mocan, Gamze Temel, Sehime Gulsun Dundar, Munis Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models |
title | BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models |
title_full | BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models |
title_fullStr | BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models |
title_full_unstemmed | BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models |
title_short | BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models |
title_sort | brca variations risk assessment in breast cancers using different artificial intelligence models |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623958/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12111774 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT senturkniyazi brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT tuncelgulten brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT doganberkcan brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT aliyevalamiya brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT dundarmehmetsait brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT ozemrisagsebnem brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT mocangamze brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT temelsehimegulsun brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT dundarmunis brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels AT ergorenmahmutcerkez brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels |