Cargando…

BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models

Artificial intelligence provides modelling on machines by simulating the human brain using learning and decision-making abilities. Early diagnosis is highly effective in reducing mortality in cancer. This study aimed to combine cancer-associated risk factors including genetic variations and design a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Senturk, Niyazi, Tuncel, Gulten, Dogan, Berkcan, Aliyeva, Lamiya, Dundar, Mehmet Sait, Ozemri Sag, Sebnem, Mocan, Gamze, Temel, Sehime Gulsun, Dundar, Munis, Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12111774
_version_ 1784606056785117184
author Senturk, Niyazi
Tuncel, Gulten
Dogan, Berkcan
Aliyeva, Lamiya
Dundar, Mehmet Sait
Ozemri Sag, Sebnem
Mocan, Gamze
Temel, Sehime Gulsun
Dundar, Munis
Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez
author_facet Senturk, Niyazi
Tuncel, Gulten
Dogan, Berkcan
Aliyeva, Lamiya
Dundar, Mehmet Sait
Ozemri Sag, Sebnem
Mocan, Gamze
Temel, Sehime Gulsun
Dundar, Munis
Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez
author_sort Senturk, Niyazi
collection PubMed
description Artificial intelligence provides modelling on machines by simulating the human brain using learning and decision-making abilities. Early diagnosis is highly effective in reducing mortality in cancer. This study aimed to combine cancer-associated risk factors including genetic variations and design an artificial intelligence system for risk assessment. Data from a total of 268 breast cancer patients have been analysed for 16 different risk factors including genetic variant classifications. In total, 61 BRCA1, 128 BRCA2 and 11 both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes associated breast cancer patients’ data were used to train the system using Mamdani’s Fuzzy Inference Method and Feed-Forward Neural Network Method as the model softwares on MATLAB. Sixteen different tests were performed on twelve different subjects who had not been introduced to the system before. The rates for neural network were 99.9% for training success, 99.6% for validation success and 99.7% for test success. Despite neural network’s overall success was slightly higher than fuzzy logic accuracy, the results from developed systems were similar (99.9% and 95.5%, respectively). The developed models make predictions from a wider perspective using more risk factors including genetic variation data compared with similar studies in the literature. Overall, this artificial intelligence models present promising results for BRCA variations’ risk assessment in breast cancers as well as a unique tool for personalized medicine software.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8623958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86239582021-11-27 BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models Senturk, Niyazi Tuncel, Gulten Dogan, Berkcan Aliyeva, Lamiya Dundar, Mehmet Sait Ozemri Sag, Sebnem Mocan, Gamze Temel, Sehime Gulsun Dundar, Munis Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez Genes (Basel) Article Artificial intelligence provides modelling on machines by simulating the human brain using learning and decision-making abilities. Early diagnosis is highly effective in reducing mortality in cancer. This study aimed to combine cancer-associated risk factors including genetic variations and design an artificial intelligence system for risk assessment. Data from a total of 268 breast cancer patients have been analysed for 16 different risk factors including genetic variant classifications. In total, 61 BRCA1, 128 BRCA2 and 11 both BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes associated breast cancer patients’ data were used to train the system using Mamdani’s Fuzzy Inference Method and Feed-Forward Neural Network Method as the model softwares on MATLAB. Sixteen different tests were performed on twelve different subjects who had not been introduced to the system before. The rates for neural network were 99.9% for training success, 99.6% for validation success and 99.7% for test success. Despite neural network’s overall success was slightly higher than fuzzy logic accuracy, the results from developed systems were similar (99.9% and 95.5%, respectively). The developed models make predictions from a wider perspective using more risk factors including genetic variation data compared with similar studies in the literature. Overall, this artificial intelligence models present promising results for BRCA variations’ risk assessment in breast cancers as well as a unique tool for personalized medicine software. MDPI 2021-11-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8623958/ /pubmed/34828379 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12111774 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Senturk, Niyazi
Tuncel, Gulten
Dogan, Berkcan
Aliyeva, Lamiya
Dundar, Mehmet Sait
Ozemri Sag, Sebnem
Mocan, Gamze
Temel, Sehime Gulsun
Dundar, Munis
Ergoren, Mahmut Cerkez
BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models
title BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models
title_full BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models
title_fullStr BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models
title_full_unstemmed BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models
title_short BRCA Variations Risk Assessment in Breast Cancers Using Different Artificial Intelligence Models
title_sort brca variations risk assessment in breast cancers using different artificial intelligence models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8623958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828379
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12111774
work_keys_str_mv AT senturkniyazi brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT tuncelgulten brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT doganberkcan brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT aliyevalamiya brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT dundarmehmetsait brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT ozemrisagsebnem brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT mocangamze brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT temelsehimegulsun brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT dundarmunis brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels
AT ergorenmahmutcerkez brcavariationsriskassessmentinbreastcancersusingdifferentartificialintelligencemodels