Cargando…

Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease

PURPOSE: We investigated the utility of the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay for detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in women from a breast screening population, including healthy women with no abnormality detected by mammogram, and women on follow-up through to advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AND...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Page, Karen, Martinson, Luke J., Fernandez-Garcia, Daniel, Hills, Allison, Gleason, Kelly L. T., Gray, Molly C., Rushton, Amelia J., Nteliopoulos, Georgios, Hastings, Robert K., Goddard, Kate, Ions, Charlotte, Parmar, Vilas, Primrose, Lindsay, Openshaw, Mark R., Guttery, David S., Palmieri, Carlo, Ali, Simak, Stebbing, Justin, Coombes, R. Charles, Shaw, Jacqueline A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34849446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00522
_version_ 1784606088985837568
author Page, Karen
Martinson, Luke J.
Fernandez-Garcia, Daniel
Hills, Allison
Gleason, Kelly L. T.
Gray, Molly C.
Rushton, Amelia J.
Nteliopoulos, Georgios
Hastings, Robert K.
Goddard, Kate
Ions, Charlotte
Parmar, Vilas
Primrose, Lindsay
Openshaw, Mark R.
Guttery, David S.
Palmieri, Carlo
Ali, Simak
Stebbing, Justin
Coombes, R. Charles
Shaw, Jacqueline A.
author_facet Page, Karen
Martinson, Luke J.
Fernandez-Garcia, Daniel
Hills, Allison
Gleason, Kelly L. T.
Gray, Molly C.
Rushton, Amelia J.
Nteliopoulos, Georgios
Hastings, Robert K.
Goddard, Kate
Ions, Charlotte
Parmar, Vilas
Primrose, Lindsay
Openshaw, Mark R.
Guttery, David S.
Palmieri, Carlo
Ali, Simak
Stebbing, Justin
Coombes, R. Charles
Shaw, Jacqueline A.
author_sort Page, Karen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We investigated the utility of the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay for detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in women from a breast screening population, including healthy women with no abnormality detected by mammogram, and women on follow-up through to advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 373 women (127 healthy controls recruited through breast screening, 28 ductal carcinoma in situ, 60 primary breast cancers, 47 primary breast cancer on follow-up, and 111 metastatic breast cancers [MBC]) to recover plasma and germline DNA for analysis with the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay on the Ion S5 platform. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen of 373 plasma samples had one or more somatic variants detected across eight of the 10 genes and were called ctDNA-positive; MBC had the highest proportion of ctDNA-positive samples (61; 55%) and healthy controls the lowest (20; 15.7%). ESR1, TP53, and PIK3CA mutations account for 93% of all variants detected and predict poor overall survival in MBC (hazard ratio = 3.461; 95% CI, 1.866 to 6.42; P = .001). Patients with MBC had higher plasma cell-free DNA levels, higher variant allele frequencies, and more polyclonal variants, notably in ESR1 than in all other groups. Only 15 individuals had evidence of potential clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential mutations. CONCLUSION: We were able detect ctDNA across the breast cancer spectrum, notably in MBC where variants in ESR1, TP53, and PIK3CA predicted poor overall survival. The assay could be used to monitor emergence of resistance mutations such as in ESR1 that herald resistance to aromatase inhibitors to tailor adjuvant therapies. However, we suggest caution is needed when interpreting results from a single plasma sample as variants were also detected in a small proportion of HCs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8624092
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86240922021-11-29 Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease Page, Karen Martinson, Luke J. Fernandez-Garcia, Daniel Hills, Allison Gleason, Kelly L. T. Gray, Molly C. Rushton, Amelia J. Nteliopoulos, Georgios Hastings, Robert K. Goddard, Kate Ions, Charlotte Parmar, Vilas Primrose, Lindsay Openshaw, Mark R. Guttery, David S. Palmieri, Carlo Ali, Simak Stebbing, Justin Coombes, R. Charles Shaw, Jacqueline A. JCO Precis Oncol ORIGINAL REPORTS PURPOSE: We investigated the utility of the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay for detecting circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in women from a breast screening population, including healthy women with no abnormality detected by mammogram, and women on follow-up through to advanced breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Blood samples were taken from 373 women (127 healthy controls recruited through breast screening, 28 ductal carcinoma in situ, 60 primary breast cancers, 47 primary breast cancer on follow-up, and 111 metastatic breast cancers [MBC]) to recover plasma and germline DNA for analysis with the Oncomine Breast cfDNA Assay on the Ion S5 platform. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen of 373 plasma samples had one or more somatic variants detected across eight of the 10 genes and were called ctDNA-positive; MBC had the highest proportion of ctDNA-positive samples (61; 55%) and healthy controls the lowest (20; 15.7%). ESR1, TP53, and PIK3CA mutations account for 93% of all variants detected and predict poor overall survival in MBC (hazard ratio = 3.461; 95% CI, 1.866 to 6.42; P = .001). Patients with MBC had higher plasma cell-free DNA levels, higher variant allele frequencies, and more polyclonal variants, notably in ESR1 than in all other groups. Only 15 individuals had evidence of potential clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential mutations. CONCLUSION: We were able detect ctDNA across the breast cancer spectrum, notably in MBC where variants in ESR1, TP53, and PIK3CA predicted poor overall survival. The assay could be used to monitor emergence of resistance mutations such as in ESR1 that herald resistance to aromatase inhibitors to tailor adjuvant therapies. However, we suggest caution is needed when interpreting results from a single plasma sample as variants were also detected in a small proportion of HCs. Wolters Kluwer Health 2021-11-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8624092/ /pubmed/34849446 http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00522 Text en © 2021 by American Society of Clinical Oncology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle ORIGINAL REPORTS
Page, Karen
Martinson, Luke J.
Fernandez-Garcia, Daniel
Hills, Allison
Gleason, Kelly L. T.
Gray, Molly C.
Rushton, Amelia J.
Nteliopoulos, Georgios
Hastings, Robert K.
Goddard, Kate
Ions, Charlotte
Parmar, Vilas
Primrose, Lindsay
Openshaw, Mark R.
Guttery, David S.
Palmieri, Carlo
Ali, Simak
Stebbing, Justin
Coombes, R. Charles
Shaw, Jacqueline A.
Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease
title Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease
title_full Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease
title_fullStr Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease
title_full_unstemmed Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease
title_short Circulating Tumor DNA Profiling From Breast Cancer Screening Through to Metastatic Disease
title_sort circulating tumor dna profiling from breast cancer screening through to metastatic disease
topic ORIGINAL REPORTS
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624092/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34849446
http://dx.doi.org/10.1200/PO.20.00522
work_keys_str_mv AT pagekaren circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT martinsonlukej circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT fernandezgarciadaniel circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT hillsallison circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT gleasonkellylt circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT graymollyc circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT rushtonameliaj circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT nteliopoulosgeorgios circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT hastingsrobertk circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT goddardkate circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT ionscharlotte circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT parmarvilas circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT primroselindsay circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT openshawmarkr circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT gutterydavids circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT palmiericarlo circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT alisimak circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT stebbingjustin circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT coombesrcharles circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease
AT shawjacquelinea circulatingtumordnaprofilingfrombreastcancerscreeningthroughtometastaticdisease