Cargando…

4-(Indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole Acylamines as Νovel Antimicrobial Agents: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation

This manuscript deals with the synthesis and computational and experimental evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of twenty-nine 4-(indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole acylamines. An evaluation of antibacterial activity against Gram (+) and Gram (−) bacteria revealed that the M...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Simakov, Sergei, Kartsev, Victor, Petrou, Anthi, Nicolaou, Ioannis, Geronikaki, Athina, Ivanov, Marija, Kostic, Marina, Glamočlija, Jasmina, Soković, Marina, Talea, Despoina, Vizirianakis, Ioannis S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34832877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111096
_version_ 1784606104059117568
author Simakov, Sergei
Kartsev, Victor
Petrou, Anthi
Nicolaou, Ioannis
Geronikaki, Athina
Ivanov, Marija
Kostic, Marina
Glamočlija, Jasmina
Soković, Marina
Talea, Despoina
Vizirianakis, Ioannis S.
author_facet Simakov, Sergei
Kartsev, Victor
Petrou, Anthi
Nicolaou, Ioannis
Geronikaki, Athina
Ivanov, Marija
Kostic, Marina
Glamočlija, Jasmina
Soković, Marina
Talea, Despoina
Vizirianakis, Ioannis S.
author_sort Simakov, Sergei
collection PubMed
description This manuscript deals with the synthesis and computational and experimental evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of twenty-nine 4-(indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole acylamines. An evaluation of antibacterial activity against Gram (+) and Gram (−) bacteria revealed that the MIC of indole derivatives is in the range of 0.06–1.88 mg/mL, while among fourteen methylindole derivatives, only six were active, with an MIC in the range of of 0.47–1.88 mg/mL. S. aureus appeared to be the most resistant strain, while S. Typhimurium was the most sensitive. Compound 5x was the most promising, with an MIC in the range of 0.06–0.12 mg/mL, followed by 5d and 5m. An evaluation of these three compounds against resistant strains, namely MRSA P. aeruginosa and E. coli, revealed that they were more potent against MRSA than ampicillin. Furthermore, compounds 5m and 5x were superior inhibitors of biofilm formation, compared to ampicillin and streptomycin, in terms Compounds 5d, 5m, and 5x interact with streptomycin in additive manner. The antifungal activity of some compounds exceeded or was equipotent to those of the reference antifungal agents bifonazole and ketoconazole. The most potent antifungal agent was found to be compound 5g. Drug likeness scores of compounds was in a range of −0.63 to 0.29, which is moderate to good. According to docking studies, E. coli MurB inhibition is probably responsible for the antibacterial activity of compounds, whereas CYP51 inhibition was implicated in antifungal activity. Compounds appeared to be non-toxic, according to the cytotoxicity assessment in MRC-5 cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8624152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86241522021-11-27 4-(Indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole Acylamines as Νovel Antimicrobial Agents: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation Simakov, Sergei Kartsev, Victor Petrou, Anthi Nicolaou, Ioannis Geronikaki, Athina Ivanov, Marija Kostic, Marina Glamočlija, Jasmina Soković, Marina Talea, Despoina Vizirianakis, Ioannis S. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article This manuscript deals with the synthesis and computational and experimental evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of twenty-nine 4-(indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole acylamines. An evaluation of antibacterial activity against Gram (+) and Gram (−) bacteria revealed that the MIC of indole derivatives is in the range of 0.06–1.88 mg/mL, while among fourteen methylindole derivatives, only six were active, with an MIC in the range of of 0.47–1.88 mg/mL. S. aureus appeared to be the most resistant strain, while S. Typhimurium was the most sensitive. Compound 5x was the most promising, with an MIC in the range of 0.06–0.12 mg/mL, followed by 5d and 5m. An evaluation of these three compounds against resistant strains, namely MRSA P. aeruginosa and E. coli, revealed that they were more potent against MRSA than ampicillin. Furthermore, compounds 5m and 5x were superior inhibitors of biofilm formation, compared to ampicillin and streptomycin, in terms Compounds 5d, 5m, and 5x interact with streptomycin in additive manner. The antifungal activity of some compounds exceeded or was equipotent to those of the reference antifungal agents bifonazole and ketoconazole. The most potent antifungal agent was found to be compound 5g. Drug likeness scores of compounds was in a range of −0.63 to 0.29, which is moderate to good. According to docking studies, E. coli MurB inhibition is probably responsible for the antibacterial activity of compounds, whereas CYP51 inhibition was implicated in antifungal activity. Compounds appeared to be non-toxic, according to the cytotoxicity assessment in MRC-5 cells. MDPI 2021-10-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8624152/ /pubmed/34832877 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111096 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Simakov, Sergei
Kartsev, Victor
Petrou, Anthi
Nicolaou, Ioannis
Geronikaki, Athina
Ivanov, Marija
Kostic, Marina
Glamočlija, Jasmina
Soković, Marina
Talea, Despoina
Vizirianakis, Ioannis S.
4-(Indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole Acylamines as Νovel Antimicrobial Agents: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation
title 4-(Indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole Acylamines as Νovel Antimicrobial Agents: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation
title_full 4-(Indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole Acylamines as Νovel Antimicrobial Agents: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation
title_fullStr 4-(Indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole Acylamines as Νovel Antimicrobial Agents: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed 4-(Indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole Acylamines as Νovel Antimicrobial Agents: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation
title_short 4-(Indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole Acylamines as Νovel Antimicrobial Agents: Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation
title_sort 4-(indol-3-yl)thiazole-2-amines and 4-ιndol-3-yl)thiazole acylamines as νovel antimicrobial agents: synthesis, in silico and in vitro evaluation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34832877
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111096
work_keys_str_mv AT simakovsergei 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT kartsevvictor 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT petrouanthi 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT nicolaouioannis 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT geronikakiathina 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT ivanovmarija 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT kosticmarina 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT glamoclijajasmina 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT sokovicmarina 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT taleadespoina 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation
AT vizirianakisioanniss 4indol3ylthiazole2aminesand4indol3ylthiazoleacylaminesasnovelantimicrobialagentssynthesisinsilicoandinvitroevaluation