Cargando…

Brain MR Image Enhancement for Tumor Segmentation Using 3D U-Net

MRI images are visually inspected by domain experts for the analysis and quantification of the tumorous tissues. Due to the large volumetric data, manual reporting on the images is subjective, cumbersome, and error prone. To address these problems, automatic image analysis tools are employed for tum...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ullah, Faizad, Ansari, Shahab U., Hanif, Muhammad, Ayari, Mohamed Arselene, Chowdhury, Muhammad Enamul Hoque, Khandakar, Amith Abdullah, Khan, Muhammad Salman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833602
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227528
_version_ 1784606123237572608
author Ullah, Faizad
Ansari, Shahab U.
Hanif, Muhammad
Ayari, Mohamed Arselene
Chowdhury, Muhammad Enamul Hoque
Khandakar, Amith Abdullah
Khan, Muhammad Salman
author_facet Ullah, Faizad
Ansari, Shahab U.
Hanif, Muhammad
Ayari, Mohamed Arselene
Chowdhury, Muhammad Enamul Hoque
Khandakar, Amith Abdullah
Khan, Muhammad Salman
author_sort Ullah, Faizad
collection PubMed
description MRI images are visually inspected by domain experts for the analysis and quantification of the tumorous tissues. Due to the large volumetric data, manual reporting on the images is subjective, cumbersome, and error prone. To address these problems, automatic image analysis tools are employed for tumor segmentation and other subsequent statistical analysis. However, prior to the tumor analysis and quantification, an important challenge lies in the pre-processing. In the present study, permutations of different pre-processing methods are comprehensively investigated. In particular, the study focused on Gibbs ringing artifact removal, bias field correction, intensity normalization, and adaptive histogram equalization (AHE). The pre-processed MRI data is then passed onto 3D U-Net for automatic segmentation of brain tumors. The segmentation results demonstrated the best performance with the combination of two techniques, i.e., Gibbs ringing artifact removal and bias-field correction. The proposed technique achieved mean dice score metrics of 0.91, 0.86, and 0.70 for the whole tumor, tumor core, and enhancing tumor, respectively. The testing mean dice scores achieved by the system are 0.90, 0.83, and 0.71 for the whole tumor, core tumor, and enhancing tumor, respectively. The novelty of this work concerns a robust pre-processing sequence for improving the segmentation accuracy of MR images. The proposed method overcame the testing dice scores of the state-of-the-art methods. The results are benchmarked with the existing techniques used in the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) 2018 challenge.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8624231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86242312021-11-27 Brain MR Image Enhancement for Tumor Segmentation Using 3D U-Net Ullah, Faizad Ansari, Shahab U. Hanif, Muhammad Ayari, Mohamed Arselene Chowdhury, Muhammad Enamul Hoque Khandakar, Amith Abdullah Khan, Muhammad Salman Sensors (Basel) Article MRI images are visually inspected by domain experts for the analysis and quantification of the tumorous tissues. Due to the large volumetric data, manual reporting on the images is subjective, cumbersome, and error prone. To address these problems, automatic image analysis tools are employed for tumor segmentation and other subsequent statistical analysis. However, prior to the tumor analysis and quantification, an important challenge lies in the pre-processing. In the present study, permutations of different pre-processing methods are comprehensively investigated. In particular, the study focused on Gibbs ringing artifact removal, bias field correction, intensity normalization, and adaptive histogram equalization (AHE). The pre-processed MRI data is then passed onto 3D U-Net for automatic segmentation of brain tumors. The segmentation results demonstrated the best performance with the combination of two techniques, i.e., Gibbs ringing artifact removal and bias-field correction. The proposed technique achieved mean dice score metrics of 0.91, 0.86, and 0.70 for the whole tumor, tumor core, and enhancing tumor, respectively. The testing mean dice scores achieved by the system are 0.90, 0.83, and 0.71 for the whole tumor, core tumor, and enhancing tumor, respectively. The novelty of this work concerns a robust pre-processing sequence for improving the segmentation accuracy of MR images. The proposed method overcame the testing dice scores of the state-of-the-art methods. The results are benchmarked with the existing techniques used in the Brain Tumor Segmentation Challenge (BraTS) 2018 challenge. MDPI 2021-11-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8624231/ /pubmed/34833602 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227528 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ullah, Faizad
Ansari, Shahab U.
Hanif, Muhammad
Ayari, Mohamed Arselene
Chowdhury, Muhammad Enamul Hoque
Khandakar, Amith Abdullah
Khan, Muhammad Salman
Brain MR Image Enhancement for Tumor Segmentation Using 3D U-Net
title Brain MR Image Enhancement for Tumor Segmentation Using 3D U-Net
title_full Brain MR Image Enhancement for Tumor Segmentation Using 3D U-Net
title_fullStr Brain MR Image Enhancement for Tumor Segmentation Using 3D U-Net
title_full_unstemmed Brain MR Image Enhancement for Tumor Segmentation Using 3D U-Net
title_short Brain MR Image Enhancement for Tumor Segmentation Using 3D U-Net
title_sort brain mr image enhancement for tumor segmentation using 3d u-net
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34833602
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21227528
work_keys_str_mv AT ullahfaizad brainmrimageenhancementfortumorsegmentationusing3dunet
AT ansarishahabu brainmrimageenhancementfortumorsegmentationusing3dunet
AT hanifmuhammad brainmrimageenhancementfortumorsegmentationusing3dunet
AT ayarimohamedarselene brainmrimageenhancementfortumorsegmentationusing3dunet
AT chowdhurymuhammadenamulhoque brainmrimageenhancementfortumorsegmentationusing3dunet
AT khandakaramithabdullah brainmrimageenhancementfortumorsegmentationusing3dunet
AT khanmuhammadsalman brainmrimageenhancementfortumorsegmentationusing3dunet