Cargando…
An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach
Essential oils (EOs) and their compounds have attracted particular attention for their reported beneficial properties, especially their antiviral potential. However, data regarding their anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential are scarce in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to identify the most promising EO...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34832920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111138 |
_version_ | 1784606137355599872 |
---|---|
author | Torres Neto, Luiz Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra Galvan, Diego Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam |
author_facet | Torres Neto, Luiz Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra Galvan, Diego Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam |
author_sort | Torres Neto, Luiz |
collection | PubMed |
description | Essential oils (EOs) and their compounds have attracted particular attention for their reported beneficial properties, especially their antiviral potential. However, data regarding their anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential are scarce in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to identify the most promising EO compounds against SARS-CoV-2 based on their physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and toxicity properties. A systematic literature search retrieved 1669 articles; 40 met the eligibility criteria, and 35 were eligible for analysis. These studies resulted in 465 EO compounds evaluated against 11 human and/or SARS-CoV-2 target proteins. Ninety-four EO compounds and seven reference drugs were clustered by the highest predicted binding affinity. Furthermore, 41 EO compounds showed suitable drug-likeness and bioactivity score indices (≥0.67). Among these EO compounds, 15 were considered the most promising against SARS-CoV-2 with the ADME/T index ranging from 0.86 to 0.81. Some plant species were identified as EO potential sources with anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity, such as Melissa officinalis Arcang, Zataria multiflora Boiss, Eugenia brasiliensis Cambess, Zingiber zerumbet Triboun & K.Larsen, Cedrus libani A.Rich, and Vetiveria zizanoides Nash. Our work can help fill the gap in the literature and guide further in vitro and in vivo studies, intending to optimize the finding of effective EOs against COVID-19. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8624289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86242892021-11-27 An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach Torres Neto, Luiz Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra Galvan, Diego Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Systematic Review Essential oils (EOs) and their compounds have attracted particular attention for their reported beneficial properties, especially their antiviral potential. However, data regarding their anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential are scarce in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to identify the most promising EO compounds against SARS-CoV-2 based on their physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and toxicity properties. A systematic literature search retrieved 1669 articles; 40 met the eligibility criteria, and 35 were eligible for analysis. These studies resulted in 465 EO compounds evaluated against 11 human and/or SARS-CoV-2 target proteins. Ninety-four EO compounds and seven reference drugs were clustered by the highest predicted binding affinity. Furthermore, 41 EO compounds showed suitable drug-likeness and bioactivity score indices (≥0.67). Among these EO compounds, 15 were considered the most promising against SARS-CoV-2 with the ADME/T index ranging from 0.86 to 0.81. Some plant species were identified as EO potential sources with anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity, such as Melissa officinalis Arcang, Zataria multiflora Boiss, Eugenia brasiliensis Cambess, Zingiber zerumbet Triboun & K.Larsen, Cedrus libani A.Rich, and Vetiveria zizanoides Nash. Our work can help fill the gap in the literature and guide further in vitro and in vivo studies, intending to optimize the finding of effective EOs against COVID-19. MDPI 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8624289/ /pubmed/34832920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111138 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Systematic Review Torres Neto, Luiz Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra Galvan, Diego Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach |
title | An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach |
title_full | An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach |
title_fullStr | An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach |
title_short | An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach |
title_sort | evaluation of the potential of essential oils against sars-cov-2 from in silico studies through the systematic review using a chemometric approach |
topic | Systematic Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34832920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111138 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT torresnetoluiz anevaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach AT monteiromarialuciaguerra anevaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach AT galvandiego anevaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach AT contejuniorcarlosadam anevaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach AT torresnetoluiz evaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach AT monteiromarialuciaguerra evaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach AT galvandiego evaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach AT contejuniorcarlosadam evaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach |