Cargando…

An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach

Essential oils (EOs) and their compounds have attracted particular attention for their reported beneficial properties, especially their antiviral potential. However, data regarding their anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential are scarce in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to identify the most promising EO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Torres Neto, Luiz, Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra, Galvan, Diego, Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34832920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111138
_version_ 1784606137355599872
author Torres Neto, Luiz
Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra
Galvan, Diego
Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam
author_facet Torres Neto, Luiz
Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra
Galvan, Diego
Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam
author_sort Torres Neto, Luiz
collection PubMed
description Essential oils (EOs) and their compounds have attracted particular attention for their reported beneficial properties, especially their antiviral potential. However, data regarding their anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential are scarce in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to identify the most promising EO compounds against SARS-CoV-2 based on their physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and toxicity properties. A systematic literature search retrieved 1669 articles; 40 met the eligibility criteria, and 35 were eligible for analysis. These studies resulted in 465 EO compounds evaluated against 11 human and/or SARS-CoV-2 target proteins. Ninety-four EO compounds and seven reference drugs were clustered by the highest predicted binding affinity. Furthermore, 41 EO compounds showed suitable drug-likeness and bioactivity score indices (≥0.67). Among these EO compounds, 15 were considered the most promising against SARS-CoV-2 with the ADME/T index ranging from 0.86 to 0.81. Some plant species were identified as EO potential sources with anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity, such as Melissa officinalis Arcang, Zataria multiflora Boiss, Eugenia brasiliensis Cambess, Zingiber zerumbet Triboun & K.Larsen, Cedrus libani A.Rich, and Vetiveria zizanoides Nash. Our work can help fill the gap in the literature and guide further in vitro and in vivo studies, intending to optimize the finding of effective EOs against COVID-19.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8624289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86242892021-11-27 An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach Torres Neto, Luiz Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra Galvan, Diego Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Systematic Review Essential oils (EOs) and their compounds have attracted particular attention for their reported beneficial properties, especially their antiviral potential. However, data regarding their anti-SARS-CoV-2 potential are scarce in the literature. Thus, this study aimed to identify the most promising EO compounds against SARS-CoV-2 based on their physicochemical, pharmacokinetic, and toxicity properties. A systematic literature search retrieved 1669 articles; 40 met the eligibility criteria, and 35 were eligible for analysis. These studies resulted in 465 EO compounds evaluated against 11 human and/or SARS-CoV-2 target proteins. Ninety-four EO compounds and seven reference drugs were clustered by the highest predicted binding affinity. Furthermore, 41 EO compounds showed suitable drug-likeness and bioactivity score indices (≥0.67). Among these EO compounds, 15 were considered the most promising against SARS-CoV-2 with the ADME/T index ranging from 0.86 to 0.81. Some plant species were identified as EO potential sources with anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity, such as Melissa officinalis Arcang, Zataria multiflora Boiss, Eugenia brasiliensis Cambess, Zingiber zerumbet Triboun & K.Larsen, Cedrus libani A.Rich, and Vetiveria zizanoides Nash. Our work can help fill the gap in the literature and guide further in vitro and in vivo studies, intending to optimize the finding of effective EOs against COVID-19. MDPI 2021-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC8624289/ /pubmed/34832920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111138 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Torres Neto, Luiz
Monteiro, Maria Lúcia Guerra
Galvan, Diego
Conte-Junior, Carlos Adam
An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach
title An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach
title_full An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach
title_fullStr An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach
title_full_unstemmed An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach
title_short An Evaluation of the Potential of Essential Oils against SARS-CoV-2 from In Silico Studies through the Systematic Review Using a Chemometric Approach
title_sort evaluation of the potential of essential oils against sars-cov-2 from in silico studies through the systematic review using a chemometric approach
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34832920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14111138
work_keys_str_mv AT torresnetoluiz anevaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach
AT monteiromarialuciaguerra anevaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach
AT galvandiego anevaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach
AT contejuniorcarlosadam anevaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach
AT torresnetoluiz evaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach
AT monteiromarialuciaguerra evaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach
AT galvandiego evaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach
AT contejuniorcarlosadam evaluationofthepotentialofessentialoilsagainstsarscov2frominsilicostudiesthroughthesystematicreviewusingachemometricapproach