Cargando…
Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford, UK()
Emergency responses to the COVID-19 pandemic led to major changes in travel behaviours and economic activities in 2020. Machine learning provides a reliable approach for assessing the contribution of these changes to air quality. This study investigates impacts of health protection measures upon air...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34843856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118584 |
_version_ | 1784606148224090112 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Ajit Bartington, Suzanne E. Song, Congbo Ghaffarpasand, Omid Kraftl, Martin Shi, Zongbo Pope, Francis D. Stacey, Brian Hall, James Thomas, G. Neil Bloss, William J. Leach, Felix C.P. |
author_facet | Singh, Ajit Bartington, Suzanne E. Song, Congbo Ghaffarpasand, Omid Kraftl, Martin Shi, Zongbo Pope, Francis D. Stacey, Brian Hall, James Thomas, G. Neil Bloss, William J. Leach, Felix C.P. |
author_sort | Singh, Ajit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Emergency responses to the COVID-19 pandemic led to major changes in travel behaviours and economic activities in 2020. Machine learning provides a reliable approach for assessing the contribution of these changes to air quality. This study investigates impacts of health protection measures upon air pollution and traffic emissions and estimates health and economic impacts arising from these changes during two national ‘lockdown’ periods in Oxford, UK. Air quality improvements were most marked during the first lockdown with reductions in observed NO(2) concentrations of 38% (SD ± 24.0%) at roadside and 17% (SD ± 5.4%) at urban background locations. Observed changes in PM(2.5,) PM(10) and O(3) concentrations were not significant during first or second lockdown. Deweathering and detrending analyses revealed a 22% (SD ± 4.4%) reduction in roadside NO(2) and 2% (SD ± 7.1%) at urban background with no significant changes in the second lockdown. Deweathered-detrended PM(2.5) and O(3) concentration changes were not significant, but PM(10) increased in the second lockdown only. City centre traffic volume reduced by 69% and 38% in the first and second lockdown periods. Buses and passenger cars were the major contributors to NO(2) emissions, with relative reductions of 56% and 77% respectively during the first lockdown, and less pronounced changes in the second lockdown. While car and bus NO(2) emissions decreased during both lockdown periods, the overall contribution from buses increased relative to cars in the second lockdown. Sustained NO(2) emissions reduction consistent with the first lockdown could prevent 48 lost life-years among the city population, with economic benefits of up to £2.5 million. Our findings highlight the critical importance of decoupling emissions changes from meteorological influences to avoid overestimation of lockdown impacts and indicate targeted emissions control measures will be the most effective strategy for achieving air quality and public health benefits in this setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8624331 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86243312021-11-26 Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford, UK() Singh, Ajit Bartington, Suzanne E. Song, Congbo Ghaffarpasand, Omid Kraftl, Martin Shi, Zongbo Pope, Francis D. Stacey, Brian Hall, James Thomas, G. Neil Bloss, William J. Leach, Felix C.P. Environ Pollut Article Emergency responses to the COVID-19 pandemic led to major changes in travel behaviours and economic activities in 2020. Machine learning provides a reliable approach for assessing the contribution of these changes to air quality. This study investigates impacts of health protection measures upon air pollution and traffic emissions and estimates health and economic impacts arising from these changes during two national ‘lockdown’ periods in Oxford, UK. Air quality improvements were most marked during the first lockdown with reductions in observed NO(2) concentrations of 38% (SD ± 24.0%) at roadside and 17% (SD ± 5.4%) at urban background locations. Observed changes in PM(2.5,) PM(10) and O(3) concentrations were not significant during first or second lockdown. Deweathering and detrending analyses revealed a 22% (SD ± 4.4%) reduction in roadside NO(2) and 2% (SD ± 7.1%) at urban background with no significant changes in the second lockdown. Deweathered-detrended PM(2.5) and O(3) concentration changes were not significant, but PM(10) increased in the second lockdown only. City centre traffic volume reduced by 69% and 38% in the first and second lockdown periods. Buses and passenger cars were the major contributors to NO(2) emissions, with relative reductions of 56% and 77% respectively during the first lockdown, and less pronounced changes in the second lockdown. While car and bus NO(2) emissions decreased during both lockdown periods, the overall contribution from buses increased relative to cars in the second lockdown. Sustained NO(2) emissions reduction consistent with the first lockdown could prevent 48 lost life-years among the city population, with economic benefits of up to £2.5 million. Our findings highlight the critical importance of decoupling emissions changes from meteorological influences to avoid overestimation of lockdown impacts and indicate targeted emissions control measures will be the most effective strategy for achieving air quality and public health benefits in this setting. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2022-01-15 2021-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8624331/ /pubmed/34843856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118584 Text en © 2021 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Singh, Ajit Bartington, Suzanne E. Song, Congbo Ghaffarpasand, Omid Kraftl, Martin Shi, Zongbo Pope, Francis D. Stacey, Brian Hall, James Thomas, G. Neil Bloss, William J. Leach, Felix C.P. Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford, UK() |
title | Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford, UK() |
title_full | Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford, UK() |
title_fullStr | Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford, UK() |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford, UK() |
title_short | Impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from Oxford, UK() |
title_sort | impacts of emergency health protection measures upon air quality, traffic and public health: evidence from oxford, uk() |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624331/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34843856 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.118584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhajit impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT bartingtonsuzannee impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT songcongbo impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT ghaffarpasandomid impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT kraftlmartin impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT shizongbo impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT popefrancisd impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT staceybrian impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT halljames impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT thomasgneil impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT blosswilliamj impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk AT leachfelixcp impactsofemergencyhealthprotectionmeasuresuponairqualitytrafficandpublichealthevidencefromoxforduk |