Cargando…

From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?

The determination of an optimal volatile sampling procedure is always a key question in analytical chemistry. In this paper, we introduce the application of a novel non-parametric statistical method, the sum of ranking differences (SRD), for the quick and efficient determination of optimal sampling...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Radványi, Dalma, Szelényi, Magdolna, Gere, Attila, Molnár, Béla Péter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112681
_version_ 1784606170360578048
author Radványi, Dalma
Szelényi, Magdolna
Gere, Attila
Molnár, Béla Péter
author_facet Radványi, Dalma
Szelényi, Magdolna
Gere, Attila
Molnár, Béla Péter
author_sort Radványi, Dalma
collection PubMed
description The determination of an optimal volatile sampling procedure is always a key question in analytical chemistry. In this paper, we introduce the application of a novel non-parametric statistical method, the sum of ranking differences (SRD), for the quick and efficient determination of optimal sampling procedures. Different types of adsorbents (Porapak Q, HayeSep Q, and Carbotrap) and sampling times (1, 2, 4, and 6 h) were used for volatile collections of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) samples. SRD identified 6 h samplings as the optimal procedure. However, 1 or 4 h sampling with HayeSep Q and 2 h sampling with Carbotrap are still efficient enough if the aim is to reduce sampling time. Based on our results, SRD provides a novel way to not only highlight an optimal sampling procedure but also decrease evaluation time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8624423
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86244232021-11-27 From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method? Radványi, Dalma Szelényi, Magdolna Gere, Attila Molnár, Béla Péter Foods Article The determination of an optimal volatile sampling procedure is always a key question in analytical chemistry. In this paper, we introduce the application of a novel non-parametric statistical method, the sum of ranking differences (SRD), for the quick and efficient determination of optimal sampling procedures. Different types of adsorbents (Porapak Q, HayeSep Q, and Carbotrap) and sampling times (1, 2, 4, and 6 h) were used for volatile collections of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) samples. SRD identified 6 h samplings as the optimal procedure. However, 1 or 4 h sampling with HayeSep Q and 2 h sampling with Carbotrap are still efficient enough if the aim is to reduce sampling time. Based on our results, SRD provides a novel way to not only highlight an optimal sampling procedure but also decrease evaluation time. MDPI 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8624423/ /pubmed/34828965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112681 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Radványi, Dalma
Szelényi, Magdolna
Gere, Attila
Molnár, Béla Péter
From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?
title From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?
title_full From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?
title_fullStr From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?
title_full_unstemmed From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?
title_short From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?
title_sort from sampling to analysis: how to achieve the best sample throughput via sampling optimization and relevant compound analysis using sum of ranking differences method?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624423/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828965
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112681
work_keys_str_mv AT radvanyidalma fromsamplingtoanalysishowtoachievethebestsamplethroughputviasamplingoptimizationandrelevantcompoundanalysisusingsumofrankingdifferencesmethod
AT szelenyimagdolna fromsamplingtoanalysishowtoachievethebestsamplethroughputviasamplingoptimizationandrelevantcompoundanalysisusingsumofrankingdifferencesmethod
AT gereattila fromsamplingtoanalysishowtoachievethebestsamplethroughputviasamplingoptimizationandrelevantcompoundanalysisusingsumofrankingdifferencesmethod
AT molnarbelapeter fromsamplingtoanalysishowtoachievethebestsamplethroughputviasamplingoptimizationandrelevantcompoundanalysisusingsumofrankingdifferencesmethod