Cargando…
From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method?
The determination of an optimal volatile sampling procedure is always a key question in analytical chemistry. In this paper, we introduce the application of a novel non-parametric statistical method, the sum of ranking differences (SRD), for the quick and efficient determination of optimal sampling...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112681 |
_version_ | 1784606170360578048 |
---|---|
author | Radványi, Dalma Szelényi, Magdolna Gere, Attila Molnár, Béla Péter |
author_facet | Radványi, Dalma Szelényi, Magdolna Gere, Attila Molnár, Béla Péter |
author_sort | Radványi, Dalma |
collection | PubMed |
description | The determination of an optimal volatile sampling procedure is always a key question in analytical chemistry. In this paper, we introduce the application of a novel non-parametric statistical method, the sum of ranking differences (SRD), for the quick and efficient determination of optimal sampling procedures. Different types of adsorbents (Porapak Q, HayeSep Q, and Carbotrap) and sampling times (1, 2, 4, and 6 h) were used for volatile collections of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) samples. SRD identified 6 h samplings as the optimal procedure. However, 1 or 4 h sampling with HayeSep Q and 2 h sampling with Carbotrap are still efficient enough if the aim is to reduce sampling time. Based on our results, SRD provides a novel way to not only highlight an optimal sampling procedure but also decrease evaluation time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8624423 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86244232021-11-27 From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method? Radványi, Dalma Szelényi, Magdolna Gere, Attila Molnár, Béla Péter Foods Article The determination of an optimal volatile sampling procedure is always a key question in analytical chemistry. In this paper, we introduce the application of a novel non-parametric statistical method, the sum of ranking differences (SRD), for the quick and efficient determination of optimal sampling procedures. Different types of adsorbents (Porapak Q, HayeSep Q, and Carbotrap) and sampling times (1, 2, 4, and 6 h) were used for volatile collections of lettuce (Lactuca sativa) samples. SRD identified 6 h samplings as the optimal procedure. However, 1 or 4 h sampling with HayeSep Q and 2 h sampling with Carbotrap are still efficient enough if the aim is to reduce sampling time. Based on our results, SRD provides a novel way to not only highlight an optimal sampling procedure but also decrease evaluation time. MDPI 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8624423/ /pubmed/34828965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112681 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Radványi, Dalma Szelényi, Magdolna Gere, Attila Molnár, Béla Péter From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method? |
title | From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method? |
title_full | From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method? |
title_fullStr | From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method? |
title_full_unstemmed | From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method? |
title_short | From Sampling to Analysis: How to Achieve the Best Sample Throughput via Sampling Optimization and Relevant Compound Analysis Using Sum of Ranking Differences Method? |
title_sort | from sampling to analysis: how to achieve the best sample throughput via sampling optimization and relevant compound analysis using sum of ranking differences method? |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8624423/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828965 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10112681 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT radvanyidalma fromsamplingtoanalysishowtoachievethebestsamplethroughputviasamplingoptimizationandrelevantcompoundanalysisusingsumofrankingdifferencesmethod AT szelenyimagdolna fromsamplingtoanalysishowtoachievethebestsamplethroughputviasamplingoptimizationandrelevantcompoundanalysisusingsumofrankingdifferencesmethod AT gereattila fromsamplingtoanalysishowtoachievethebestsamplethroughputviasamplingoptimizationandrelevantcompoundanalysisusingsumofrankingdifferencesmethod AT molnarbelapeter fromsamplingtoanalysishowtoachievethebestsamplethroughputviasamplingoptimizationandrelevantcompoundanalysisusingsumofrankingdifferencesmethod |