Cargando…

ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test

Since the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive cap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Juhee, Lee, Ga-Young, Bae, Green, Kang, Mi-Jeong, Lim, Kyung-Min
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822705
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9110314
_version_ 1784606315474059264
author Han, Juhee
Lee, Ga-Young
Bae, Green
Kang, Mi-Jeong
Lim, Kyung-Min
author_facet Han, Juhee
Lee, Ga-Young
Bae, Green
Kang, Mi-Jeong
Lim, Kyung-Min
author_sort Han, Juhee
collection PubMed
description Since the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive capacity and applicability domain. Here, we compiled a reference chemical database (ChemSkin DB) for the development and evaluation of new in vitro skin irritation tests. The first candidates were selected from 317 chemicals (source data n = 1567) searched from the literature from the last 20 years, including previous validation study reports, ECETOC, and published papers. Chemicals showing inconsistent classification or those that were commercially unavailable, difficult or dangerous to handle, prohibitively expensive, or without quality in vivo or in vitro data were removed, leaving a total of 100 chemicals. Supporting references, in vivo Draize scores, UN GHS/EU CLP classifications and commercial sources were compiled. Test results produced by the approved methods of OECD Test No. 439 were included and compared using the classification table, scatter plot, and Pearson correlation analysis to identify the false predictions and differences between in vitro skin irritation tests. These results may provide an insight into the future development of new in vitro skin irritation tests.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8625019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86250192021-11-27 ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test Han, Juhee Lee, Ga-Young Bae, Green Kang, Mi-Jeong Lim, Kyung-Min Toxics Article Since the animal test ban on cosmetics in the EU in 2013, alternative in vitro safety tests have been actively researched to replace in vivo animal tests. For the development and evaluation of a new test method, reference chemicals with quality in vivo data are essential to assess the predictive capacity and applicability domain. Here, we compiled a reference chemical database (ChemSkin DB) for the development and evaluation of new in vitro skin irritation tests. The first candidates were selected from 317 chemicals (source data n = 1567) searched from the literature from the last 20 years, including previous validation study reports, ECETOC, and published papers. Chemicals showing inconsistent classification or those that were commercially unavailable, difficult or dangerous to handle, prohibitively expensive, or without quality in vivo or in vitro data were removed, leaving a total of 100 chemicals. Supporting references, in vivo Draize scores, UN GHS/EU CLP classifications and commercial sources were compiled. Test results produced by the approved methods of OECD Test No. 439 were included and compared using the classification table, scatter plot, and Pearson correlation analysis to identify the false predictions and differences between in vitro skin irritation tests. These results may provide an insight into the future development of new in vitro skin irritation tests. MDPI 2021-11-18 /pmc/articles/PMC8625019/ /pubmed/34822705 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9110314 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Han, Juhee
Lee, Ga-Young
Bae, Green
Kang, Mi-Jeong
Lim, Kyung-Min
ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_full ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_fullStr ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_full_unstemmed ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_short ChemSkin Reference Chemical Database for the Development of an In Vitro Skin Irritation Test
title_sort chemskin reference chemical database for the development of an in vitro skin irritation test
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822705
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxics9110314
work_keys_str_mv AT hanjuhee chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT leegayoung chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT baegreen chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT kangmijeong chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest
AT limkyungmin chemskinreferencechemicaldatabaseforthedevelopmentofaninvitroskinirritationtest