Cargando…
Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants
Recently, nanofertilizers are being tested as a new technology, either for soil or foliar applications, to improve food production and with a reduced environmental impact. Nano calcium phosphate (NCaP) was successfully synthesized, characterized and applied in this study. A pot experiment was carrie...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11112913 |
_version_ | 1784606388347994112 |
---|---|
author | El-Ghany, Mona F. Abd El-Kherbawy, Mohamady I. Abdel-Aal, Youssef A. El-Dek, Samaa I. Abd El-Baky, Tarek |
author_facet | El-Ghany, Mona F. Abd El-Kherbawy, Mohamady I. Abdel-Aal, Youssef A. El-Dek, Samaa I. Abd El-Baky, Tarek |
author_sort | El-Ghany, Mona F. Abd |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently, nanofertilizers are being tested as a new technology, either for soil or foliar applications, to improve food production and with a reduced environmental impact. Nano calcium phosphate (NCaP) was successfully synthesized, characterized and applied in this study. A pot experiment was carried out in two successive seasons in 2016 and 2017 on (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to obtain the best phosphorus treatments. The results were applied in a field experiment during the 2018–2019 season. Single superphosphate (SSP) at 30 and 60 kg P(2)O(5) fed(−1) and NCaP at 10%, 20% and 30% from the recommended dose were applied to the soil. Foliar application involved both monoammonium phosphate (MAP) at one rate of 2.5 g L(−1) and NCaP at 5% and 10% from the MAP rate. The results of all experiments showed that NCaP significantly increased the shoot and root dry weights, the nutrient content in the shoot and root, the yield components, the nutrient concentration and crude protein percentage in pods of the snap bean plants compared with traditional P. The greatest increase was obtained from a 20% NCaP soil application in combination with a 5% NCaP foliar application. The present study recommends using NCaP as an alternative source of P to mitigate the negative effects of traditional sources. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8625305 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86253052021-11-27 Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants El-Ghany, Mona F. Abd El-Kherbawy, Mohamady I. Abdel-Aal, Youssef A. El-Dek, Samaa I. Abd El-Baky, Tarek Nanomaterials (Basel) Article Recently, nanofertilizers are being tested as a new technology, either for soil or foliar applications, to improve food production and with a reduced environmental impact. Nano calcium phosphate (NCaP) was successfully synthesized, characterized and applied in this study. A pot experiment was carried out in two successive seasons in 2016 and 2017 on (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) plants to obtain the best phosphorus treatments. The results were applied in a field experiment during the 2018–2019 season. Single superphosphate (SSP) at 30 and 60 kg P(2)O(5) fed(−1) and NCaP at 10%, 20% and 30% from the recommended dose were applied to the soil. Foliar application involved both monoammonium phosphate (MAP) at one rate of 2.5 g L(−1) and NCaP at 5% and 10% from the MAP rate. The results of all experiments showed that NCaP significantly increased the shoot and root dry weights, the nutrient content in the shoot and root, the yield components, the nutrient concentration and crude protein percentage in pods of the snap bean plants compared with traditional P. The greatest increase was obtained from a 20% NCaP soil application in combination with a 5% NCaP foliar application. The present study recommends using NCaP as an alternative source of P to mitigate the negative effects of traditional sources. MDPI 2021-10-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8625305/ /pubmed/34835677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11112913 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article El-Ghany, Mona F. Abd El-Kherbawy, Mohamady I. Abdel-Aal, Youssef A. El-Dek, Samaa I. Abd El-Baky, Tarek Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants |
title | Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants |
title_full | Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants |
title_fullStr | Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants |
title_short | Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants |
title_sort | comparative study between traditional and nano calcium phosphate fertilizers on growth and production of snap bean (phaseolus vulgaris l.) plants |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625305/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835677 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/nano11112913 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elghanymonafabd comparativestudybetweentraditionalandnanocalciumphosphatefertilizersongrowthandproductionofsnapbeanphaseolusvulgarislplants AT elkherbawymohamadyi comparativestudybetweentraditionalandnanocalciumphosphatefertilizersongrowthandproductionofsnapbeanphaseolusvulgarislplants AT abdelaalyoussefa comparativestudybetweentraditionalandnanocalciumphosphatefertilizersongrowthandproductionofsnapbeanphaseolusvulgarislplants AT eldeksamaai comparativestudybetweentraditionalandnanocalciumphosphatefertilizersongrowthandproductionofsnapbeanphaseolusvulgarislplants AT abdelbakytarek comparativestudybetweentraditionalandnanocalciumphosphatefertilizersongrowthandproductionofsnapbeanphaseolusvulgarislplants |