Cargando…
Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
Campylobacteriosis is the most common bacterial foodborne illness in the United States and is frequently associated with foods of animal origin. The goals of this study were to compare clinical and non-clinical Campylobacter populations from Tennessee (TN) and Pennsylvania (PA), use phylogenetic rel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835426 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112300 |
_version_ | 1784606396610772992 |
---|---|
author | Hudson, Lauren K. Andershock, William E. Yan, Runan Golwalkar, Mugdha M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M. Nachamkin, Irving Thomas, Linda S. Moore, Christina Qian, Xiaorong Steece, Richard Garman, Katie N. Dunn, John R. Kovac, Jasna Denes, Thomas G. |
author_facet | Hudson, Lauren K. Andershock, William E. Yan, Runan Golwalkar, Mugdha M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M. Nachamkin, Irving Thomas, Linda S. Moore, Christina Qian, Xiaorong Steece, Richard Garman, Katie N. Dunn, John R. Kovac, Jasna Denes, Thomas G. |
author_sort | Hudson, Lauren K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Campylobacteriosis is the most common bacterial foodborne illness in the United States and is frequently associated with foods of animal origin. The goals of this study were to compare clinical and non-clinical Campylobacter populations from Tennessee (TN) and Pennsylvania (PA), use phylogenetic relatedness to assess source attribution patterns, and identify potential outbreak clusters. Campylobacter isolates studied (n = 3080) included TN clinical isolates collected and sequenced for routine surveillance, PA clinical isolates collected from patients at the University of Pennsylvania Health System facilities, and non-clinical isolates from both states for which sequencing reads were available on NCBI. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted to categorize isolates into species groups and determine the population structure of each species. Most isolates were C. jejuni (n = 2132, 69.2%) and C. coli (n = 921, 29.9%), while the remaining were C. lari (0.4%), C. upsaliensis (0.3%), and C. fetus (0.1%). The C. jejuni group consisted of three clades; most non-clinical isolates were of poultry (62.7%) or cattle (35.8%) origin, and 59.7 and 16.5% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry or cattle, respectively. The C. coli isolates grouped into two clades; most non-clinical isolates were from poultry (61.2%) or swine (29.0%) sources, and 74.5, 9.2, and 6.1% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry, cattle, or swine, respectively. Based on genomic similarity, we identified 42 C. jejuni and one C. coli potential outbreak clusters. The C. jejuni clusters contained 188 clinical isolates, 19.6% of the total C. jejuni clinical isolates, suggesting that a larger proportion of campylobacteriosis may be associated with outbreaks than previously determined. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8625337 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86253372021-11-27 Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania Hudson, Lauren K. Andershock, William E. Yan, Runan Golwalkar, Mugdha M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M. Nachamkin, Irving Thomas, Linda S. Moore, Christina Qian, Xiaorong Steece, Richard Garman, Katie N. Dunn, John R. Kovac, Jasna Denes, Thomas G. Microorganisms Article Campylobacteriosis is the most common bacterial foodborne illness in the United States and is frequently associated with foods of animal origin. The goals of this study were to compare clinical and non-clinical Campylobacter populations from Tennessee (TN) and Pennsylvania (PA), use phylogenetic relatedness to assess source attribution patterns, and identify potential outbreak clusters. Campylobacter isolates studied (n = 3080) included TN clinical isolates collected and sequenced for routine surveillance, PA clinical isolates collected from patients at the University of Pennsylvania Health System facilities, and non-clinical isolates from both states for which sequencing reads were available on NCBI. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted to categorize isolates into species groups and determine the population structure of each species. Most isolates were C. jejuni (n = 2132, 69.2%) and C. coli (n = 921, 29.9%), while the remaining were C. lari (0.4%), C. upsaliensis (0.3%), and C. fetus (0.1%). The C. jejuni group consisted of three clades; most non-clinical isolates were of poultry (62.7%) or cattle (35.8%) origin, and 59.7 and 16.5% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry or cattle, respectively. The C. coli isolates grouped into two clades; most non-clinical isolates were from poultry (61.2%) or swine (29.0%) sources, and 74.5, 9.2, and 6.1% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry, cattle, or swine, respectively. Based on genomic similarity, we identified 42 C. jejuni and one C. coli potential outbreak clusters. The C. jejuni clusters contained 188 clinical isolates, 19.6% of the total C. jejuni clinical isolates, suggesting that a larger proportion of campylobacteriosis may be associated with outbreaks than previously determined. MDPI 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8625337/ /pubmed/34835426 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112300 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hudson, Lauren K. Andershock, William E. Yan, Runan Golwalkar, Mugdha M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M. Nachamkin, Irving Thomas, Linda S. Moore, Christina Qian, Xiaorong Steece, Richard Garman, Katie N. Dunn, John R. Kovac, Jasna Denes, Thomas G. Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania |
title | Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania |
title_full | Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania |
title_fullStr | Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania |
title_full_unstemmed | Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania |
title_short | Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania |
title_sort | phylogenetic analysis reveals source attribution patterns for campylobacter spp. in tennessee and pennsylvania |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625337/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835426 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112300 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hudsonlaurenk phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT andershockwilliame phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT yanrunan phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT golwalkarmugdha phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT mikanathankuchiam phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT nachamkinirving phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT thomaslindas phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT moorechristina phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT qianxiaorong phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT steecerichard phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT garmankatien phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT dunnjohnr phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT kovacjasna phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania AT denesthomasg phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania |