Cargando…

Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania

Campylobacteriosis is the most common bacterial foodborne illness in the United States and is frequently associated with foods of animal origin. The goals of this study were to compare clinical and non-clinical Campylobacter populations from Tennessee (TN) and Pennsylvania (PA), use phylogenetic rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudson, Lauren K., Andershock, William E., Yan, Runan, Golwalkar, Mugdha, M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M., Nachamkin, Irving, Thomas, Linda S., Moore, Christina, Qian, Xiaorong, Steece, Richard, Garman, Katie N., Dunn, John R., Kovac, Jasna, Denes, Thomas G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835426
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112300
_version_ 1784606396610772992
author Hudson, Lauren K.
Andershock, William E.
Yan, Runan
Golwalkar, Mugdha
M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M.
Nachamkin, Irving
Thomas, Linda S.
Moore, Christina
Qian, Xiaorong
Steece, Richard
Garman, Katie N.
Dunn, John R.
Kovac, Jasna
Denes, Thomas G.
author_facet Hudson, Lauren K.
Andershock, William E.
Yan, Runan
Golwalkar, Mugdha
M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M.
Nachamkin, Irving
Thomas, Linda S.
Moore, Christina
Qian, Xiaorong
Steece, Richard
Garman, Katie N.
Dunn, John R.
Kovac, Jasna
Denes, Thomas G.
author_sort Hudson, Lauren K.
collection PubMed
description Campylobacteriosis is the most common bacterial foodborne illness in the United States and is frequently associated with foods of animal origin. The goals of this study were to compare clinical and non-clinical Campylobacter populations from Tennessee (TN) and Pennsylvania (PA), use phylogenetic relatedness to assess source attribution patterns, and identify potential outbreak clusters. Campylobacter isolates studied (n = 3080) included TN clinical isolates collected and sequenced for routine surveillance, PA clinical isolates collected from patients at the University of Pennsylvania Health System facilities, and non-clinical isolates from both states for which sequencing reads were available on NCBI. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted to categorize isolates into species groups and determine the population structure of each species. Most isolates were C. jejuni (n = 2132, 69.2%) and C. coli (n = 921, 29.9%), while the remaining were C. lari (0.4%), C. upsaliensis (0.3%), and C. fetus (0.1%). The C. jejuni group consisted of three clades; most non-clinical isolates were of poultry (62.7%) or cattle (35.8%) origin, and 59.7 and 16.5% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry or cattle, respectively. The C. coli isolates grouped into two clades; most non-clinical isolates were from poultry (61.2%) or swine (29.0%) sources, and 74.5, 9.2, and 6.1% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry, cattle, or swine, respectively. Based on genomic similarity, we identified 42 C. jejuni and one C. coli potential outbreak clusters. The C. jejuni clusters contained 188 clinical isolates, 19.6% of the total C. jejuni clinical isolates, suggesting that a larger proportion of campylobacteriosis may be associated with outbreaks than previously determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8625337
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86253372021-11-27 Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania Hudson, Lauren K. Andershock, William E. Yan, Runan Golwalkar, Mugdha M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M. Nachamkin, Irving Thomas, Linda S. Moore, Christina Qian, Xiaorong Steece, Richard Garman, Katie N. Dunn, John R. Kovac, Jasna Denes, Thomas G. Microorganisms Article Campylobacteriosis is the most common bacterial foodborne illness in the United States and is frequently associated with foods of animal origin. The goals of this study were to compare clinical and non-clinical Campylobacter populations from Tennessee (TN) and Pennsylvania (PA), use phylogenetic relatedness to assess source attribution patterns, and identify potential outbreak clusters. Campylobacter isolates studied (n = 3080) included TN clinical isolates collected and sequenced for routine surveillance, PA clinical isolates collected from patients at the University of Pennsylvania Health System facilities, and non-clinical isolates from both states for which sequencing reads were available on NCBI. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted to categorize isolates into species groups and determine the population structure of each species. Most isolates were C. jejuni (n = 2132, 69.2%) and C. coli (n = 921, 29.9%), while the remaining were C. lari (0.4%), C. upsaliensis (0.3%), and C. fetus (0.1%). The C. jejuni group consisted of three clades; most non-clinical isolates were of poultry (62.7%) or cattle (35.8%) origin, and 59.7 and 16.5% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry or cattle, respectively. The C. coli isolates grouped into two clades; most non-clinical isolates were from poultry (61.2%) or swine (29.0%) sources, and 74.5, 9.2, and 6.1% of clinical isolates were in subclades associated with poultry, cattle, or swine, respectively. Based on genomic similarity, we identified 42 C. jejuni and one C. coli potential outbreak clusters. The C. jejuni clusters contained 188 clinical isolates, 19.6% of the total C. jejuni clinical isolates, suggesting that a larger proportion of campylobacteriosis may be associated with outbreaks than previously determined. MDPI 2021-11-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8625337/ /pubmed/34835426 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112300 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hudson, Lauren K.
Andershock, William E.
Yan, Runan
Golwalkar, Mugdha
M’ikanatha, Nkuchia M.
Nachamkin, Irving
Thomas, Linda S.
Moore, Christina
Qian, Xiaorong
Steece, Richard
Garman, Katie N.
Dunn, John R.
Kovac, Jasna
Denes, Thomas G.
Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
title Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
title_full Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
title_fullStr Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
title_short Phylogenetic Analysis Reveals Source Attribution Patterns for Campylobacter spp. in Tennessee and Pennsylvania
title_sort phylogenetic analysis reveals source attribution patterns for campylobacter spp. in tennessee and pennsylvania
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625337/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835426
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112300
work_keys_str_mv AT hudsonlaurenk phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT andershockwilliame phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT yanrunan phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT golwalkarmugdha phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT mikanathankuchiam phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT nachamkinirving phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT thomaslindas phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT moorechristina phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT qianxiaorong phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT steecerichard phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT garmankatien phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT dunnjohnr phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT kovacjasna phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania
AT denesthomasg phylogeneticanalysisrevealssourceattributionpatternsforcampylobactersppintennesseeandpennsylvania