Cargando…

Diagnostic Performance of [(18)F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1–2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer

Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET) potentially underperforms for staging of patients with grade 1–2 estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in this patient populati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iqbal, Ramsha, Mammatas, Lemonitsa H., Aras, Tuba, Vogel, Wouter V., van de Brug, Tim, Oprea-Lager, Daniela E., Verheul, Henk M. W., Hoekstra, Otto S., Boellaard, Ronald, Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Catharina W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111954
_version_ 1784606399375867904
author Iqbal, Ramsha
Mammatas, Lemonitsa H.
Aras, Tuba
Vogel, Wouter V.
van de Brug, Tim
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Verheul, Henk M. W.
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Boellaard, Ronald
Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Catharina W.
author_facet Iqbal, Ramsha
Mammatas, Lemonitsa H.
Aras, Tuba
Vogel, Wouter V.
van de Brug, Tim
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Verheul, Henk M. W.
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Boellaard, Ronald
Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Catharina W.
author_sort Iqbal, Ramsha
collection PubMed
description Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET) potentially underperforms for staging of patients with grade 1–2 estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in this patient population. Suspect tumor lesions detected on conventional imaging and FDG PET were confirmed with pathology or follow up. PET-positive lesions were (semi)quantified with standardized uptake values (SUV) and these were correlated with various pathological features, including the histological subtype. Pre-operative imaging detected 155 pathologically verified lesions (in 74 patients). A total of 115/155 (74.2%) lesions identified on FDG PET were classified as true positive, i.e., malignant (in 67 patients) and 17/155 (10.8%) lesions as false positive, i.e., benign (in 9 patients); 7/155 (4.5%) as false negative (in 7 patients) and 16/155 (10.3%) as true negative (in 14 patients). FDG PET incorrectly staged 16/70 (22.9%) patients. The FDG uptake correlated with histological subtype, showing higher uptake in ductal carcinoma, compared to lobular carcinoma (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Within this study, FDG PET inadequately staged 22.9% of grade 1–2, ER + BC cases. Incorrect staging can lead to inappropriate treatment choices, potentially affecting survival and quality of life. Prospective studies investigating novel radiotracers are urgently needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8625348
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86253482021-11-27 Diagnostic Performance of [(18)F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1–2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer Iqbal, Ramsha Mammatas, Lemonitsa H. Aras, Tuba Vogel, Wouter V. van de Brug, Tim Oprea-Lager, Daniela E. Verheul, Henk M. W. Hoekstra, Otto S. Boellaard, Ronald Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Catharina W. Diagnostics (Basel) Article Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG PET) potentially underperforms for staging of patients with grade 1–2 estrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer. The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the diagnostic accuracy of FDG PET in this patient population. Suspect tumor lesions detected on conventional imaging and FDG PET were confirmed with pathology or follow up. PET-positive lesions were (semi)quantified with standardized uptake values (SUV) and these were correlated with various pathological features, including the histological subtype. Pre-operative imaging detected 155 pathologically verified lesions (in 74 patients). A total of 115/155 (74.2%) lesions identified on FDG PET were classified as true positive, i.e., malignant (in 67 patients) and 17/155 (10.8%) lesions as false positive, i.e., benign (in 9 patients); 7/155 (4.5%) as false negative (in 7 patients) and 16/155 (10.3%) as true negative (in 14 patients). FDG PET incorrectly staged 16/70 (22.9%) patients. The FDG uptake correlated with histological subtype, showing higher uptake in ductal carcinoma, compared to lobular carcinoma (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Within this study, FDG PET inadequately staged 22.9% of grade 1–2, ER + BC cases. Incorrect staging can lead to inappropriate treatment choices, potentially affecting survival and quality of life. Prospective studies investigating novel radiotracers are urgently needed. MDPI 2021-10-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8625348/ /pubmed/34829301 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111954 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Iqbal, Ramsha
Mammatas, Lemonitsa H.
Aras, Tuba
Vogel, Wouter V.
van de Brug, Tim
Oprea-Lager, Daniela E.
Verheul, Henk M. W.
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Boellaard, Ronald
Menke-van der Houven van Oordt, Catharina W.
Diagnostic Performance of [(18)F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1–2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
title Diagnostic Performance of [(18)F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1–2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
title_full Diagnostic Performance of [(18)F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1–2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Diagnostic Performance of [(18)F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1–2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic Performance of [(18)F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1–2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
title_short Diagnostic Performance of [(18)F]FDG PET in Staging Grade 1–2, Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
title_sort diagnostic performance of [(18)f]fdg pet in staging grade 1–2, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625348/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34829301
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11111954
work_keys_str_mv AT iqbalramsha diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT mammataslemonitsah diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT arastuba diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT vogelwouterv diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT vandebrugtim diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT oprealagerdanielae diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT verheulhenkmw diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT hoekstraottos diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT boellaardronald diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer
AT menkevanderhouvenvanoordtcatharinaw diagnosticperformanceof18ffdgpetinstaginggrade12estrogenreceptorpositivebreastcancer