Cargando…

Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments

There is currently limited evidence supporting the use of telepractice to conduct bottle-feeding assessments. This study aimed to investigate the inter-rater reliability of bottle-feeding assessments conducted via synchronous telepractice (real-time videoconferencing). Secondary aims were to investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raatz, Madeline, Ward, Elizabeth C., Marshall, Jeanne, Burns, Clare L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828701
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8110989
_version_ 1784606455196811264
author Raatz, Madeline
Ward, Elizabeth C.
Marshall, Jeanne
Burns, Clare L.
author_facet Raatz, Madeline
Ward, Elizabeth C.
Marshall, Jeanne
Burns, Clare L.
author_sort Raatz, Madeline
collection PubMed
description There is currently limited evidence supporting the use of telepractice to conduct bottle-feeding assessments. This study aimed to investigate the inter-rater reliability of bottle-feeding assessments conducted via synchronous telepractice (real-time videoconferencing). Secondary aims were to investigate parent and clinician satisfaction. Bottle-feeding skills of 30 children (aged 1 month–2 years) were simultaneously assessed by a telepractice SP (T-SP) at a remote location and an in-person SP (IP-SP) at the family home. A purpose-designed assessment form was used to evaluate: (1) developmental level (screen only), (2) state, color, and respiration, (3) oral motor skills, (4), infant oral reflexes, (5) tongue tie (screen only), (6) non-nutritive suck, (7) bottle-feeding, (8) overall feeding skills and (9) recommendations. Results of the T-SP and IP-SP assessments were compared using agreement statistics. Parents reported perceptions of telepractice pre and post session, and also rated post-session satisfaction. The telepractice SP completed a satisfaction questionnaire post-appointment. The majority of assessment components (45/53, 85%) met the agreement criteria (≥80% exact agreement). Difficulties were noted for the assessment of palate integrity, gagging during non-nutritive suck assessment, and 6 components of the tongue tie screen. Parent and clinician satisfaction was high; SPs reported that they would offer telepractice services to 93% of families again in the future. Overall, the results demonstrated that most components of a bottle-feeding assessment could be reliably completed via synchronous telepractice in family homes. However, further research is required to improve the reliability of some intra-oral assessment components.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8625576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86255762021-11-27 Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments Raatz, Madeline Ward, Elizabeth C. Marshall, Jeanne Burns, Clare L. Children (Basel) Article There is currently limited evidence supporting the use of telepractice to conduct bottle-feeding assessments. This study aimed to investigate the inter-rater reliability of bottle-feeding assessments conducted via synchronous telepractice (real-time videoconferencing). Secondary aims were to investigate parent and clinician satisfaction. Bottle-feeding skills of 30 children (aged 1 month–2 years) were simultaneously assessed by a telepractice SP (T-SP) at a remote location and an in-person SP (IP-SP) at the family home. A purpose-designed assessment form was used to evaluate: (1) developmental level (screen only), (2) state, color, and respiration, (3) oral motor skills, (4), infant oral reflexes, (5) tongue tie (screen only), (6) non-nutritive suck, (7) bottle-feeding, (8) overall feeding skills and (9) recommendations. Results of the T-SP and IP-SP assessments were compared using agreement statistics. Parents reported perceptions of telepractice pre and post session, and also rated post-session satisfaction. The telepractice SP completed a satisfaction questionnaire post-appointment. The majority of assessment components (45/53, 85%) met the agreement criteria (≥80% exact agreement). Difficulties were noted for the assessment of palate integrity, gagging during non-nutritive suck assessment, and 6 components of the tongue tie screen. Parent and clinician satisfaction was high; SPs reported that they would offer telepractice services to 93% of families again in the future. Overall, the results demonstrated that most components of a bottle-feeding assessment could be reliably completed via synchronous telepractice in family homes. However, further research is required to improve the reliability of some intra-oral assessment components. MDPI 2021-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC8625576/ /pubmed/34828701 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8110989 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Raatz, Madeline
Ward, Elizabeth C.
Marshall, Jeanne
Burns, Clare L.
Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments
title Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments
title_full Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments
title_fullStr Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments
title_short Evaluating the Use of Telepractice for Bottle-Feeding Assessments
title_sort evaluating the use of telepractice for bottle-feeding assessments
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34828701
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/children8110989
work_keys_str_mv AT raatzmadeline evaluatingtheuseoftelepracticeforbottlefeedingassessments
AT wardelizabethc evaluatingtheuseoftelepracticeforbottlefeedingassessments
AT marshalljeanne evaluatingtheuseoftelepracticeforbottlefeedingassessments
AT burnsclarel evaluatingtheuseoftelepracticeforbottlefeedingassessments