Cargando…
The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions
Equine hoof canker and bovine digital dermatitis are infectious inflammatory diseases of the hooves with an unknown etiology. However, anaerobic spirochetes of the genus Treponema are considered to be potential etiological agents. The aim of this study was to find a suitable way to isolate DNA and t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112190 |
_version_ | 1784606472708030464 |
---|---|
author | Marčeková, Paulína Mad’ar, Marián Styková, Eva Kačírová, Jana Sondorová, Miriam Mudroň, Pavol Žert, Zdeněk |
author_facet | Marčeková, Paulína Mad’ar, Marián Styková, Eva Kačírová, Jana Sondorová, Miriam Mudroň, Pavol Žert, Zdeněk |
author_sort | Marčeková, Paulína |
collection | PubMed |
description | Equine hoof canker and bovine digital dermatitis are infectious inflammatory diseases of the hooves with an unknown etiology. However, anaerobic spirochetes of the genus Treponema are considered to be potential etiological agents. The aim of this study was to find a suitable way to isolate DNA and to detect the presence of treponemal DNA in samples of equine hoof canker and bovine digital dermatitis. DNAzol(®®) Direct and column kits were used to isolate DNA from samples of equine hoof canker and bovine digital dermatitis. The presence of Treponema spp. was detected using PCR and Sanger sequencing. DNAzol(®®) Direct is suitable for isolating DNA from these types of samples. Treponemal DNA was detected in equine hoof samples as well as in bovine digital dermatitis skin samples. In equine hoof biopsies, the most frequently detected was Treponema pedis (8/13). Treponema brennaborense (2/13) and Treponema denticola (2/13) were also found. In the case of bovine digital dermatitis, Treponema medium ssp. bovis was confirmed in 14 of 36 skin samples. Treponema pedis (9/36), Treponema vincentii (1/36), Treponema phagedenis (1/36), and Treponema brennaborense (1/36) were detected as well. DNAzol(®®) Direct was more appropriate for isolation of treponemal DNA because the columns isolation method was more equipment and time-consuming. The presence of several Treponema spp. was determined in the samples. In horses, the most commonly detected species was a T. pedis, while in cattle it was T. medium ssp. bovis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8625648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86256482021-11-27 The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions Marčeková, Paulína Mad’ar, Marián Styková, Eva Kačírová, Jana Sondorová, Miriam Mudroň, Pavol Žert, Zdeněk Microorganisms Article Equine hoof canker and bovine digital dermatitis are infectious inflammatory diseases of the hooves with an unknown etiology. However, anaerobic spirochetes of the genus Treponema are considered to be potential etiological agents. The aim of this study was to find a suitable way to isolate DNA and to detect the presence of treponemal DNA in samples of equine hoof canker and bovine digital dermatitis. DNAzol(®®) Direct and column kits were used to isolate DNA from samples of equine hoof canker and bovine digital dermatitis. The presence of Treponema spp. was detected using PCR and Sanger sequencing. DNAzol(®®) Direct is suitable for isolating DNA from these types of samples. Treponemal DNA was detected in equine hoof samples as well as in bovine digital dermatitis skin samples. In equine hoof biopsies, the most frequently detected was Treponema pedis (8/13). Treponema brennaborense (2/13) and Treponema denticola (2/13) were also found. In the case of bovine digital dermatitis, Treponema medium ssp. bovis was confirmed in 14 of 36 skin samples. Treponema pedis (9/36), Treponema vincentii (1/36), Treponema phagedenis (1/36), and Treponema brennaborense (1/36) were detected as well. DNAzol(®®) Direct was more appropriate for isolation of treponemal DNA because the columns isolation method was more equipment and time-consuming. The presence of several Treponema spp. was determined in the samples. In horses, the most commonly detected species was a T. pedis, while in cattle it was T. medium ssp. bovis. MDPI 2021-10-20 /pmc/articles/PMC8625648/ /pubmed/34835315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112190 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Marčeková, Paulína Mad’ar, Marián Styková, Eva Kačírová, Jana Sondorová, Miriam Mudroň, Pavol Žert, Zdeněk The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions |
title | The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions |
title_full | The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions |
title_fullStr | The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions |
title_full_unstemmed | The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions |
title_short | The Presence of Treponema spp. in Equine Hoof Canker Biopsies and Skin Samples from Bovine Digital Dermatitis Lesions |
title_sort | presence of treponema spp. in equine hoof canker biopsies and skin samples from bovine digital dermatitis lesions |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34835315 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marcekovapaulina thepresenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT madarmarian thepresenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT stykovaeva thepresenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT kacirovajana thepresenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT sondorovamiriam thepresenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT mudronpavol thepresenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT zertzdenek thepresenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT marcekovapaulina presenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT madarmarian presenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT stykovaeva presenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT kacirovajana presenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT sondorovamiriam presenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT mudronpavol presenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions AT zertzdenek presenceoftreponemasppinequinehoofcankerbiopsiesandskinsamplesfrombovinedigitaldermatitislesions |