Cargando…
Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on k...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110250 |
_version_ | 1784606474422452224 |
---|---|
author | Altman, Kayla Glumm, Samantha Stainton, Kendall Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen Webster, Stacey Winkle, Melissa Y. |
author_facet | Altman, Kayla Glumm, Samantha Stainton, Kendall Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen Webster, Stacey Winkle, Melissa Y. |
author_sort | Altman, Kayla |
collection | PubMed |
description | While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on kinematics of individuals in the normal young adult population. Sixteen participants were video recorded while walking in a straight line for 3.7 m (12 feet) under three different conditions (ambulating with no device, ambulating with a standard cane on the left side, and ambulating with a mobility dog on the left side). Differences between joint angles under each of the conditions were analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found in left elbow flexion when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with no device; left shoulder abduction when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with a mobility dog, ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and ambulating with a cane versus no device; and left hip extension when comparing ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and when ambulating with a mobility dog versus a cane. These findings suggest that providers should evaluate and monitor potential negative impacts of assistive devices such as mobility dogs on human kinematics. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8625655 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86256552021-11-27 Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study Altman, Kayla Glumm, Samantha Stainton, Kendall Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen Webster, Stacey Winkle, Melissa Y. Vet Sci Article While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on kinematics of individuals in the normal young adult population. Sixteen participants were video recorded while walking in a straight line for 3.7 m (12 feet) under three different conditions (ambulating with no device, ambulating with a standard cane on the left side, and ambulating with a mobility dog on the left side). Differences between joint angles under each of the conditions were analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found in left elbow flexion when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with no device; left shoulder abduction when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with a mobility dog, ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and ambulating with a cane versus no device; and left hip extension when comparing ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and when ambulating with a mobility dog versus a cane. These findings suggest that providers should evaluate and monitor potential negative impacts of assistive devices such as mobility dogs on human kinematics. MDPI 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8625655/ /pubmed/34822623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110250 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Altman, Kayla Glumm, Samantha Stainton, Kendall Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen Webster, Stacey Winkle, Melissa Y. Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study |
title | Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study |
title_full | Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study |
title_fullStr | Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study |
title_short | Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study |
title_sort | impacts of mobility dogs on kinematics during ambulation: a quantitative study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625655/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110250 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT altmankayla impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy AT glummsamantha impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy AT staintonkendall impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy AT herlachepretzerellen impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy AT websterstacey impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy AT winklemelissay impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy |