Cargando…

Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study

While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on k...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Altman, Kayla, Glumm, Samantha, Stainton, Kendall, Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen, Webster, Stacey, Winkle, Melissa Y.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110250
_version_ 1784606474422452224
author Altman, Kayla
Glumm, Samantha
Stainton, Kendall
Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen
Webster, Stacey
Winkle, Melissa Y.
author_facet Altman, Kayla
Glumm, Samantha
Stainton, Kendall
Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen
Webster, Stacey
Winkle, Melissa Y.
author_sort Altman, Kayla
collection PubMed
description While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on kinematics of individuals in the normal young adult population. Sixteen participants were video recorded while walking in a straight line for 3.7 m (12 feet) under three different conditions (ambulating with no device, ambulating with a standard cane on the left side, and ambulating with a mobility dog on the left side). Differences between joint angles under each of the conditions were analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found in left elbow flexion when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with no device; left shoulder abduction when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with a mobility dog, ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and ambulating with a cane versus no device; and left hip extension when comparing ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and when ambulating with a mobility dog versus a cane. These findings suggest that providers should evaluate and monitor potential negative impacts of assistive devices such as mobility dogs on human kinematics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8625655
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86256552021-11-27 Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study Altman, Kayla Glumm, Samantha Stainton, Kendall Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen Webster, Stacey Winkle, Melissa Y. Vet Sci Article While prior research has explored various physiological consequences associated with assistive device use for ambulation, limited research has specifically explored the impact of mobility dog partnership on human kinematics. This descriptive study examined the impact of mobility dog partnership on kinematics of individuals in the normal young adult population. Sixteen participants were video recorded while walking in a straight line for 3.7 m (12 feet) under three different conditions (ambulating with no device, ambulating with a standard cane on the left side, and ambulating with a mobility dog on the left side). Differences between joint angles under each of the conditions were analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found in left elbow flexion when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with no device; left shoulder abduction when comparing ambulating with a cane versus ambulating with a mobility dog, ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and ambulating with a cane versus no device; and left hip extension when comparing ambulating with a mobility dog versus no device, and when ambulating with a mobility dog versus a cane. These findings suggest that providers should evaluate and monitor potential negative impacts of assistive devices such as mobility dogs on human kinematics. MDPI 2021-10-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8625655/ /pubmed/34822623 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110250 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Altman, Kayla
Glumm, Samantha
Stainton, Kendall
Herlache-Pretzer, Ellen
Webster, Stacey
Winkle, Melissa Y.
Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_full Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_fullStr Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_short Impacts of Mobility Dogs on Kinematics during Ambulation: A Quantitative Study
title_sort impacts of mobility dogs on kinematics during ambulation: a quantitative study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8625655/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34822623
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/vetsci8110250
work_keys_str_mv AT altmankayla impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT glummsamantha impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT staintonkendall impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT herlachepretzerellen impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT websterstacey impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy
AT winklemelissay impactsofmobilitydogsonkinematicsduringambulationaquantitativestudy