Cargando…

Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely

PURPOSE: As the monolateral external fixator is increasingly used in trauma-control and definitive management for high-energy long bone fractures, timing the fixator removal remains a challenge for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the bony cal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yanshi, Cai, Feiyu, Liu, Kai, Zhang, Xingpeng, Li, Hong, Fu, Xuefei, Zhang, Tao, Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05116-z
_version_ 1784606640349118464
author Liu, Yanshi
Cai, Feiyu
Liu, Kai
Zhang, Xingpeng
Li, Hong
Fu, Xuefei
Zhang, Tao
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
author_facet Liu, Yanshi
Cai, Feiyu
Liu, Kai
Zhang, Xingpeng
Li, Hong
Fu, Xuefei
Zhang, Tao
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
author_sort Liu, Yanshi
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: As the monolateral external fixator is increasingly used in trauma-control and definitive management for high-energy long bone fractures, timing the fixator removal remains a challenge for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely. METHODS: A total of 131 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by the monolateral external fixator in our institution were collected from January 2013 to July 2019. In group I, the fixators were removed based on the clinical and radiological assessment only by the treating surgeon. As for group II, the axial load-share (LS) ratio test was accomplished by another medical team without the knowledge of the clinical results. The external fixator was removed when the mechanical test outcome (LS ratio < 10%) was consistent with the conclusion drawn from the clinical and radiological assessment (bone union achieved) by the treating surgeon. RESULTS: There was no statistical significance in demographic data between the two groups (P > 0.05). In group I, four patients suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 7.7%) after fixator removal and were successfully treated by an intramedullary nail. In group II, 71 patients underwent fixator removal after the first mechanical test, and another eight patients terminated the external fixation after the second test. None of the 79 patients in group II suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 0%). There was statistical significance in the refracture rate between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo using the additional circular frame components is an effectively quantitative indicator to complement the clinical assessment of fracture healing in a monolateral external fixation treatment. Removal of the monolateral external fixator is safe when the axial load-share ratio dropped below 10%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8626363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86263632021-12-01 Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely Liu, Yanshi Cai, Feiyu Liu, Kai Zhang, Xingpeng Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Tao Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: As the monolateral external fixator is increasingly used in trauma-control and definitive management for high-energy long bone fractures, timing the fixator removal remains a challenge for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely. METHODS: A total of 131 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by the monolateral external fixator in our institution were collected from January 2013 to July 2019. In group I, the fixators were removed based on the clinical and radiological assessment only by the treating surgeon. As for group II, the axial load-share (LS) ratio test was accomplished by another medical team without the knowledge of the clinical results. The external fixator was removed when the mechanical test outcome (LS ratio < 10%) was consistent with the conclusion drawn from the clinical and radiological assessment (bone union achieved) by the treating surgeon. RESULTS: There was no statistical significance in demographic data between the two groups (P > 0.05). In group I, four patients suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 7.7%) after fixator removal and were successfully treated by an intramedullary nail. In group II, 71 patients underwent fixator removal after the first mechanical test, and another eight patients terminated the external fixation after the second test. None of the 79 patients in group II suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 0%). There was statistical significance in the refracture rate between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo using the additional circular frame components is an effectively quantitative indicator to complement the clinical assessment of fracture healing in a monolateral external fixation treatment. Removal of the monolateral external fixator is safe when the axial load-share ratio dropped below 10%. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-23 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8626363/ /pubmed/34164731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05116-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Liu, Yanshi
Cai, Feiyu
Liu, Kai
Zhang, Xingpeng
Li, Hong
Fu, Xuefei
Zhang, Tao
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely
title Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely
title_full Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely
title_fullStr Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely
title_full_unstemmed Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely
title_short Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely
title_sort bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164731
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05116-z
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyanshi bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely
AT caifeiyu bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely
AT liukai bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely
AT zhangxingpeng bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely
AT lihong bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely
AT fuxuefei bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely
AT zhangtao bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely
AT yusufuaihemaitijiang bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely