Cargando…
Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely
PURPOSE: As the monolateral external fixator is increasingly used in trauma-control and definitive management for high-energy long bone fractures, timing the fixator removal remains a challenge for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the bony cal...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05116-z |
_version_ | 1784606640349118464 |
---|---|
author | Liu, Yanshi Cai, Feiyu Liu, Kai Zhang, Xingpeng Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Tao Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang |
author_facet | Liu, Yanshi Cai, Feiyu Liu, Kai Zhang, Xingpeng Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Tao Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang |
author_sort | Liu, Yanshi |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: As the monolateral external fixator is increasingly used in trauma-control and definitive management for high-energy long bone fractures, timing the fixator removal remains a challenge for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely. METHODS: A total of 131 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by the monolateral external fixator in our institution were collected from January 2013 to July 2019. In group I, the fixators were removed based on the clinical and radiological assessment only by the treating surgeon. As for group II, the axial load-share (LS) ratio test was accomplished by another medical team without the knowledge of the clinical results. The external fixator was removed when the mechanical test outcome (LS ratio < 10%) was consistent with the conclusion drawn from the clinical and radiological assessment (bone union achieved) by the treating surgeon. RESULTS: There was no statistical significance in demographic data between the two groups (P > 0.05). In group I, four patients suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 7.7%) after fixator removal and were successfully treated by an intramedullary nail. In group II, 71 patients underwent fixator removal after the first mechanical test, and another eight patients terminated the external fixation after the second test. None of the 79 patients in group II suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 0%). There was statistical significance in the refracture rate between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo using the additional circular frame components is an effectively quantitative indicator to complement the clinical assessment of fracture healing in a monolateral external fixation treatment. Removal of the monolateral external fixator is safe when the axial load-share ratio dropped below 10%. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8626363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-86263632021-12-01 Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely Liu, Yanshi Cai, Feiyu Liu, Kai Zhang, Xingpeng Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Tao Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang Int Orthop Original Paper PURPOSE: As the monolateral external fixator is increasingly used in trauma-control and definitive management for high-energy long bone fractures, timing the fixator removal remains a challenge for surgeons. The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility and effectiveness of the bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely. METHODS: A total of 131 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated by the monolateral external fixator in our institution were collected from January 2013 to July 2019. In group I, the fixators were removed based on the clinical and radiological assessment only by the treating surgeon. As for group II, the axial load-share (LS) ratio test was accomplished by another medical team without the knowledge of the clinical results. The external fixator was removed when the mechanical test outcome (LS ratio < 10%) was consistent with the conclusion drawn from the clinical and radiological assessment (bone union achieved) by the treating surgeon. RESULTS: There was no statistical significance in demographic data between the two groups (P > 0.05). In group I, four patients suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 7.7%) after fixator removal and were successfully treated by an intramedullary nail. In group II, 71 patients underwent fixator removal after the first mechanical test, and another eight patients terminated the external fixation after the second test. None of the 79 patients in group II suffered refracture (the refracture rate was 0%). There was statistical significance in the refracture rate between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo using the additional circular frame components is an effectively quantitative indicator to complement the clinical assessment of fracture healing in a monolateral external fixation treatment. Removal of the monolateral external fixator is safe when the axial load-share ratio dropped below 10%. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-06-23 2021-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8626363/ /pubmed/34164731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05116-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Liu, Yanshi Cai, Feiyu Liu, Kai Zhang, Xingpeng Li, Hong Fu, Xuefei Zhang, Tao Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely |
title | Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely |
title_full | Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely |
title_fullStr | Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely |
title_full_unstemmed | Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely |
title_short | Bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely |
title_sort | bony callus stiffness indirectly evaluated by the axial load-share ratio in vivo as a guide to removing a monolateral external fixator safely |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34164731 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00264-021-05116-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT liuyanshi bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely AT caifeiyu bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely AT liukai bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely AT zhangxingpeng bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely AT lihong bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely AT fuxuefei bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely AT zhangtao bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely AT yusufuaihemaitijiang bonycallusstiffnessindirectlyevaluatedbytheaxialloadshareratioinvivoasaguidetoremovingamonolateralexternalfixatorsafely |