Cargando…

First Clinical Results of the Merit WRAPSODY™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Access Circuit Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients

PURPOSE: This prospective, observational first in human study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of WRAPSODY(TM) Cell-impermeable Endoprosthesis (Merit Medical Systems, Inc.) in the treatment of arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft access circuit stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gilbert, James, Rai, Jason, Kingsmore, David, Skousen, John, Ptohis, Nikolaos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02953-8
_version_ 1784606647566467072
author Gilbert, James
Rai, Jason
Kingsmore, David
Skousen, John
Ptohis, Nikolaos
author_facet Gilbert, James
Rai, Jason
Kingsmore, David
Skousen, John
Ptohis, Nikolaos
author_sort Gilbert, James
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This prospective, observational first in human study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of WRAPSODY(TM) Cell-impermeable Endoprosthesis (Merit Medical Systems, Inc.) in the treatment of arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft access circuit stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators conducted a prospective analysis of 46 patients with access circuit stenosis from three centres. Treatment sites included the peripheral outflow veins (e.g. cephalic arch, basilic vein swing point; 16 fistula and 10 graft patients); the graft-vein anastomosis (9 patients); and the central veins (up to, but not including the SVC; 11 patients). Primary outcome measures included 30-day freedom from access circuit-related safety events and 30-day target lesion primary patency. Secondary outcome measures included procedural success; device- and procedure-related adverse events; target lesion primary patency; access circuit primary patency; and secondary patency. In-person follow-up was scheduled at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. An independent data monitoring/clinical event committee adjudicated all reinterventions and device/procedure-relatedness for adverse events. RESULTS: All initial procedures were successful. All but one patient was free from safety events through the first 30 days (97.8% (45/46)). This event was not device-related. Over the remainder of the study, one adverse event was adjudicated as possibly device-related. Six- and 12-month target lesion primary patency rates were 97.7% (42/43) and 84.6.% (33/39), respectively. Six- and 12-month access circuit primary patency rates were 84.4% (38/45) and 65.9% (29/44), respectively. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the study device is safe and effective for treatment of stenoses in the peripheral and central veins of arteriovenous access circuits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b, cohort study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00270-021-02953-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8626397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-86263972021-12-01 First Clinical Results of the Merit WRAPSODY™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Access Circuit Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients Gilbert, James Rai, Jason Kingsmore, David Skousen, John Ptohis, Nikolaos Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol Clinical Investigation PURPOSE: This prospective, observational first in human study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of WRAPSODY(TM) Cell-impermeable Endoprosthesis (Merit Medical Systems, Inc.) in the treatment of arteriovenous fistula and arteriovenous graft access circuit stenosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Investigators conducted a prospective analysis of 46 patients with access circuit stenosis from three centres. Treatment sites included the peripheral outflow veins (e.g. cephalic arch, basilic vein swing point; 16 fistula and 10 graft patients); the graft-vein anastomosis (9 patients); and the central veins (up to, but not including the SVC; 11 patients). Primary outcome measures included 30-day freedom from access circuit-related safety events and 30-day target lesion primary patency. Secondary outcome measures included procedural success; device- and procedure-related adverse events; target lesion primary patency; access circuit primary patency; and secondary patency. In-person follow-up was scheduled at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. An independent data monitoring/clinical event committee adjudicated all reinterventions and device/procedure-relatedness for adverse events. RESULTS: All initial procedures were successful. All but one patient was free from safety events through the first 30 days (97.8% (45/46)). This event was not device-related. Over the remainder of the study, one adverse event was adjudicated as possibly device-related. Six- and 12-month target lesion primary patency rates were 97.7% (42/43) and 84.6.% (33/39), respectively. Six- and 12-month access circuit primary patency rates were 84.4% (38/45) and 65.9% (29/44), respectively. CONCLUSION: Results suggest that the study device is safe and effective for treatment of stenoses in the peripheral and central veins of arteriovenous access circuits. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2b, cohort study. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00270-021-02953-8. Springer US 2021-09-12 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8626397/ /pubmed/34514534 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02953-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Gilbert, James
Rai, Jason
Kingsmore, David
Skousen, John
Ptohis, Nikolaos
First Clinical Results of the Merit WRAPSODY™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Access Circuit Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients
title First Clinical Results of the Merit WRAPSODY™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Access Circuit Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients
title_full First Clinical Results of the Merit WRAPSODY™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Access Circuit Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients
title_fullStr First Clinical Results of the Merit WRAPSODY™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Access Circuit Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients
title_full_unstemmed First Clinical Results of the Merit WRAPSODY™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Access Circuit Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients
title_short First Clinical Results of the Merit WRAPSODY™ Cell-Impermeable Endoprosthesis for Treatment of Access Circuit Stenosis in Haemodialysis Patients
title_sort first clinical results of the merit wrapsody™ cell-impermeable endoprosthesis for treatment of access circuit stenosis in haemodialysis patients
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8626397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34514534
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02953-8
work_keys_str_mv AT gilbertjames firstclinicalresultsofthemeritwrapsodycellimpermeableendoprosthesisfortreatmentofaccesscircuitstenosisinhaemodialysispatients
AT raijason firstclinicalresultsofthemeritwrapsodycellimpermeableendoprosthesisfortreatmentofaccesscircuitstenosisinhaemodialysispatients
AT kingsmoredavid firstclinicalresultsofthemeritwrapsodycellimpermeableendoprosthesisfortreatmentofaccesscircuitstenosisinhaemodialysispatients
AT skousenjohn firstclinicalresultsofthemeritwrapsodycellimpermeableendoprosthesisfortreatmentofaccesscircuitstenosisinhaemodialysispatients
AT ptohisnikolaos firstclinicalresultsofthemeritwrapsodycellimpermeableendoprosthesisfortreatmentofaccesscircuitstenosisinhaemodialysispatients